Complete Captcha
Loading..
Economist 2dbf
It's a simple conversion actually - multiply the number of papers you refereed with a big fat zero.
this
Economist 0f7f
EJMR analysis is that publication outside the top journals is a negative signal, so the referee report is probably better.
Economist abf4
Economist 9549
eq=eq
Economist 50fc
20=tier1 publication; 10=tier2 publication; 5=0thers. Confirmed
Economist 9e09
LRM schools 5; HRM schools like mine 50.
Economist b26e
My LRM university uses 10 referee reports equals 1 Tier II publication. Confirmed.
Economist c1f9
50 for sure.
Depends on the tier; 1 for Tier 1, 5 for Tier 2, 20 for tier 3, etc.
0 with certainty.
Economist 3d50
Don't ask me; ask my dad who is an editor.
Economist ef9f
In math people list the abstracts of the papers they have refereed. Why not in economics?
Because economics is an academic field that is full of conflict of interests.
Economist 07e4
At my LRM institution I was given 1 journal article credit for 10 referee reports.
At my LRM institution I was given 1 journal article credit for 10 referee reports. +++++++++++ Nice conversion factor.
Post <blockquote><blockquote>I have now written at least 25 referee reports for good journals. Surely, these reports must be worth something. Can I claim 1 or 2 journal publication equivalence on my CV?</blockquote> Sure, just add the papers you refereed to your publication list on your CV, adding your own name as a coauthor.</blockquote>
Send Post »
Markup: a blockquote code em strong ul ol li.
a blockquote code em strong ul ol li