Close

Complete Captcha

• 1 year - 153 posts - Latest - RSS
• Thread: 252 Goods vs 133 No Goods

1. Economist
   f368
   

   Zilliboti is vile

   Yale does try its best to help out its juniors by all means, like resurrecting Michael Peters dead JMP after 6 years giving it a RR at Ecma after an Ecma editor joins them. Yale does its part, it's the incompetent juniors they select.

   Same happened to Nicholas Ryan. 7 years old JMP suddenly got an ECMA RR..

   1 year ago # QUOTE 2 Jab 0 No Jab !

2. Economist
   1cd2
   

   Didn’t he publish his own paper while he was the editor?

   Zilliboti is vile

   Yale does try its best to help out its juniors by all means, like resurrecting Michael Peters dead JMP after 6 years giving it a RR at Ecma after an Ecma editor joins them. Yale does its part, it's the incompetent juniors they select.

   Same happened to Nicholas Ryan. 7 years old JMP suddenly got an ECMA RR..
   

   1 year ago # QUOTE 0 Jab 0 No Jab !

3. Economist
   151e
   

   ^ More details please.

   1 year ago # QUOTE 0 Jab 0 No Jab !

4. Economist
   a866
   

   Didn’t he publish his own paper while he was the editor?

   Zilliboti is vile

   Yale does try its best to help out its juniors by all means, like resurrecting Michael Peters dead JMP after 6 years giving it a RR at Ecma after an Ecma editor joins them. Yale does its part, it's the incompetent juniors they select.

   Same happened to Nicholas Ryan. 7 years old JMP suddenly got an ECMA RR..
   

   Yes

   1 year ago # QUOTE 0 Jab 0 No Jab !

5. Economist
   56bf
   

   any news on michael peters? is he moving to somewhere else?

   5 months ago # QUOTE 0 Jab 0 No Jab !

6. Economist
   574a
   

   Humphries is so bad. Yale only has itself to blame

   2 months ago # QUOTE 0 Jab 0 No Jab !

7. Economist
   57c4
   

   what about SOM?

   2 months ago # QUOTE 1 Jab 0 No Jab !

8. Economist
   ce48
   

   any news on michael peters? is he moving to somewhere else?

   He's visiting somewhere in Europe this year. I guess he is up for tenure this year, maybe got an extension with Covid though?

   2 months ago # QUOTE 0 Jab 0 No Jab !

9. Economist
   5610
   

   Humphries is so bad. Yale only has itself to blame

   blame MM for overselling... he was the one responsible for getting him on restud tour

   2 months ago # QUOTE 0 Jab 0 No Jab !

10. Economist
    37df
    

    Humphries is so bad. Yale only has itself to blame

    blame MM for overselling... he was the one responsible for getting him on restud tour

    Mogstad inflating the girlfriend Winnie is an even worse offense

    2 months ago # QUOTE 0 Jab 0 No Jab !

11. Economist
    2e42
    

    Humphries is so bad. Yale only has itself to blame

    blame MM for overselling... he was the one responsible for getting him on restud tour

    Mogstad inflating the girlfriend Winnie is an even worse offense

    both very true

    2 months ago # QUOTE 0 Jab 0 No Jab !

12. Economist
    37df
    

    Humphries is so bad. Yale only has itself to blame

    blame MM for overselling... he was the one responsible for getting him on restud tour

    Mogstad inflating the girlfriend Winnie is an even worse offense

    both very true

    Even worse is the fact that humphries writing the jmp for the girlfriend

    2 months ago # QUOTE 0 Jab 0 No Jab !

13. Economist
    ca01
    

    Will ZH get tenure?

    2 months ago # QUOTE 0 Jab 0 No Jab !

Reply

Post <blockquote><blockquote><blockquote>That's not the way that market works. They select from among the most promising grad students on the market to hire APs, then they go back to the international market look for the folks who have produced the most as APs to hire their associates. Sometimes their APs end up being those most productive folks, but not usually. If you should be lucky enough to hit that lottery and get a top-x tenure track job, think of it as a very long postdoc with great pay and very little teaching, and understand that you'll move. I thought everybody knew that by now. </blockquote> What does it say about our profession that we are most often wrong about who have the most promise? If those people get the best resources and yet often don't succeed, then maybe we're selecting them on the wrong basis. Yet more often than not the market seems to agree to zoom into a few, knowing that they're often wrong? </blockquote> The musings of a moron.</blockquote>

Send Post »

Markup: a blockquote code em strong ul ol li.