Close

Complete Captcha

• 1 year - 145 posts - Latest - RSS
• Thread: 225 Goods vs 124 No Goods

1. Economist
   f368
   

   Zilliboti is vile

   Yale does try its best to help out its juniors by all means, like resurrecting Michael Peters dead JMP after 6 years giving it a RR at Ecma after an Ecma editor joins them. Yale does its part, it's the incompetent juniors they select.

   Same happened to Nicholas Ryan. 7 years old JMP suddenly got an ECMA RR..

   1 year ago # QUOTE 1 Good 0 No Good !

2. Economist
   1cd2
   

   Didn’t he publish his own paper while he was the editor?

   Zilliboti is vile

   Yale does try its best to help out its juniors by all means, like resurrecting Michael Peters dead JMP after 6 years giving it a RR at Ecma after an Ecma editor joins them. Yale does its part, it's the incompetent juniors they select.

   Same happened to Nicholas Ryan. 7 years old JMP suddenly got an ECMA RR..
   

   1 year ago # QUOTE 0 Good 0 No Good !

3. Economist
   151e
   

   ^ More details please.

   1 year ago # QUOTE 0 Good 0 No Good !

4. Economist
   a866
   

   Didn’t he publish his own paper while he was the editor?

   Zilliboti is vile

   Yale does try its best to help out its juniors by all means, like resurrecting Michael Peters dead JMP after 6 years giving it a RR at Ecma after an Ecma editor joins them. Yale does its part, it's the incompetent juniors they select.

   Same happened to Nicholas Ryan. 7 years old JMP suddenly got an ECMA RR..
   

   Yes

   1 year ago # QUOTE 0 Good 0 No Good !

5. Economist
   56bf
   

   any news on michael peters? is he moving to somewhere else?

   3 days ago # QUOTE 0 Good 0 No Good !

Reply

Post <blockquote><blockquote><blockquote>That's not the way that market works. They select from among the most promising grad students on the market to hire APs, then they go back to the international market look for the folks who have produced the most as APs to hire their associates. Sometimes their APs end up being those most productive folks, but not usually. If you should be lucky enough to hit that lottery and get a top-x tenure track job, think of it as a very long postdoc with great pay and very little teaching, and understand that you'll move. I thought everybody knew that by now. </blockquote> What does it say about our profession that we are most often wrong about who have the most promise? If those people get the best resources and yet often don't succeed, then maybe we're selecting them on the wrong basis. Yet more often than not the market seems to agree to zoom into a few, knowing that they're often wrong? </blockquote> The musings of a moron.</blockquote>

Send Post »

Markup: a blockquote code em strong ul ol li.