Bump
mentally i.ll phd reject bumping the thread again. Are you on your break from studing for the GRE?
Armstrong, Kurlat, and Metcalfe.
Who are the top10-level hires for USC? I can think of Chaney, but who else?Things are not this easy, OP. When you get out of the top 6, things like field, resources, fit with colleagues, level of phd program start mattering a lot. Plus, it depends a lot on how far in the past you go: Over the last 20 years USC is definitely not top 25, but their hires over the last three are on par with the top 10, IMO.
And Thomas Chaney
Armstrong, Kurlat, and Metcalfe.
Who are the top10-level hires for USC? I can think of Chaney, but who else?Things are not this easy, OP. When you get out of the top 6, things like field, resources, fit with colleagues, level of phd program start mattering a lot. Plus, it depends a lot on how far in the past you go: Over the last 20 years USC is definitely not top 25, but their hires over the last three are on par with the top 10, IMO.
These are top20 level hires
Armstrong, Kurlat, and Metcalfe.
Who are the top10-level hires for USC? I can think of Chaney, but who else?Things are not this easy, OP. When you get out of the top 6, things like field, resources, fit with colleagues, level of phd program start mattering a lot. Plus, it depends a lot on how far in the past you go: Over the last 20 years USC is definitely not top 25, but their hires over the last three are on par with the top 10, IMO.
Well, it can only be good for USC's ranking since NL has an awesome agenda and 6 top 5s... He also had an offer from Northwestern and picked USC, which tells us quite a bit about the department's ability to attract talent using its location, previous impressive hires, and money.
Any change to these opinions given the hiring of NL?