Close

Complete Captcha

• 11 months - 660 posts - Latest - RSS
• Thread: 1110 Goods vs 395 No Goods

1. Economist
   bb51
   

   ^James Kung is so desperate, trying to convince us that all empirical researchers manipulate data and misreport coefficients.

   9 months ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 0 Vlad !

2. Economist
   1c6e
   

   LoL
   - Just Kidding

   ^James Kung is so desperate, trying to convince us that all empirical researchers manipulate data and misreport coefficients.

   9 months ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 0 Vlad !

3. Economist
   bb51
   

   Just kidding.
   -James Kung

   LoL
   - Just Kidding

   ^James Kung is so desperate, trying to convince us that all empirical researchers manipulate data and misreport coefficients.
   

   9 months ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 0 Vlad !

4. Economist
   1c6e
   

   佔屎坑？Just kidding.

   9 months ago # QUOTE 2 Volod 0 Vlad !

5. Economist
   d61c
   

   APSR论文被Gary King的最新工作论文引用

   论文链接：http://gking.harvard.edu/gking/files/censored.pdf

   Gary King是哈佛大学政治科学系教授，政治科学领域的big name！

   9 months ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 2 Vlad !

6. Economist
   bb19
   

   APSR论文被Gary King的最新工作论文引用
   论文链接：http://gking.harvard.edu/gking/files/censored.pdf
   Gary King是哈佛大学政治科学系教授，政治科学领域的big name！

   最新工作论文 published in 2013?

   9 months ago # QUOTE 4 Volod 0 Vlad !

7. Economist
   654c
   

   楼里有些人的三观确实有点惊人。。。这么明显的学术造假，居然也能洗。吴亦凡应该请你们做辩护律师

   9 months ago # QUOTE 2 Volod 0 Vlad !

8. Economist
   4a1d
   

   三观不惊人的话也不会跟Kung同流合污了。。。

   楼里有些人的三观确实有点惊人。。。这么明显的学术造假，居然也能洗。吴亦凡应该请你们做辩护律师

   9 months ago # QUOTE 2 Volod 0 Vlad !

9. Economist
   092e
   

   bump

   9 months ago # QUOTE 1 Volod 0 Vlad !

10. Economist
    092e
    

    造假的结果，传播越广影响越恶劣

    APSR论文被Gary King的最新工作论文引用
    论文链接：http://gking.harvard.edu/gking/files/censored.pdf
    Gary King是哈佛大学政治科学系教授，政治科学领域的big name！

    9 months ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 0 Vlad !

11. Economist
    0d0f
    

    Did anyone send the comment by Dali Yang on the APSR paper to Gary King?

    9 months ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 0 Vlad !

12. Economist
    d985
    

    Dali Yang first sent the comment to the APSR editor, Daniel Treisman, asking him to retract the paper. But for some reason Treisman was hesitant to do so, so Yang published that comment in another journal instead.

    Did anyone send the comment by Dali Yang on the APSR paper to Gary King?

    9 months ago # QUOTE 2 Volod 0 Vlad !

13. Economist
    5292
    

    别酸了。抓到老鼠就是成功，你悲愤也没有用。

    楼里有些人的三观确实有点惊人。。。这么明显的学术造假，居然也能洗。吴亦凡应该请你们做辩护律师

    9 months ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 2 Vlad !

14. Economist
    a3a9
    

    Thanks for the life advice, Professor Kung

    别酸了。抓到老鼠就是成功，你悲愤也没有用。

    楼里有些人的三观确实有点惊人。。。这么明显的学术造假，居然也能洗。吴亦凡应该请你们做辩护律师
    

    9 months ago # QUOTE 1 Volod 0 Vlad !

15. Economist
    3b0b
    

    appalling
    it is clear that english journals have no ability to identify good research on china. recent good pubs all have data manuniplation or faking problem...

    9 months ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 0 Vlad !

16. Economist
    a457
    

    need some publishment. this is a series of crime.

    9 months ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 0 Vlad !

17. Economist
    caf8
    

    need some publishment. this is a series of crime.

    Learn english first, zhang.

    9 months ago # QUOTE 1 Volod 0 Vlad !

18. Economist
    a3a9
    

    Thanks again for the life advice, James.

    need some publishment. this is a series of crime.

    Learn english first, zhang.

    9 months ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 0 Vlad !

19. Economist
    9933
    

    bump

    9 months ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 0 Vlad !

20. Economist
    a3fa
    

    shame on kung and his coauthors

    8 months ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 0 Vlad !

Reply »