Complete Captcha
Loading..
Economist 74d3
Kung老师显然日了你妈，不然怎么会有你这种为造假洗地的孝子贤孙？
Kung老师日 你妈了吗？天天黑他！再黑我们全师门上阵一起去日 你家！
Economist 1dab
bump
Economist 4b1b
吵什么呢？人家成功了抓到老鼠了，你们不去学习经验，在这里嫉妒泼脏水，有什么意思？
Economist e1ef
Xiumin Martin才是yin贱，舔白吊给白吊日比，背信弃义数典忘祖改姓，抄袭中文论文学术不端
Economist cf48
Wow
Economist d468
Very well said! -Shuo
Post <blockquote><blockquote>Typical shady behavior = p-hacking and cherry-picking. Kung's behavior = blatant data manipulation and mis-reporting. Kung's behavior is orders of magnitudes worse than typical "shady behavior". <blockquote>No one cares about this mumbo jumbo. Most empirical research is fraud and has all sort of shady behaviors to get results. All academics are complicit in the same behaviors so none of them will speak up. Chances are, the more powerful / prolific the academic, the more shady things they do. </blockquote></blockquote> You dont get it, most empiricists do some kind of shady data manipulation to get results. Lots of shades of different bad behavior. What do you expect when you have infinite incentives and little to no downside or risk of being caught.</blockquote>
Send Post »
Markup: a blockquote code em strong ul ol li.
a blockquote code em strong ul ol li