Close

Complete Captcha

• 1 year - 670 posts - Latest - RSS
• Thread: 1125 Goods vs 398 No Goods

1. Economist
   74d3
   

   Kung老师显然日了你妈，不然怎么会有你这种为造假洗地的孝子贤孙？

   Kung老师日 你妈了吗？天天黑他！再黑我们全师门上阵一起去日 你家！

   1 month ago # QUOTE 6 Volod 0 Vlad !

2. Economist
   1dab
   

   bump

   2 weeks ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 0 Vlad !

3. Economist
   4b1b
   

   吵什么呢？人家成功了抓到老鼠了，你们不去学习经验，在这里嫉妒泼脏水，有什么意思？

   2 weeks ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 2 Vlad !

4. Economist
   e1ef
   

   Xiumin Martin才是yin贱，舔白吊给白吊日比，背信弃义数典忘祖改姓，抄袭中文论文学术不端

   2 weeks ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 1 Vlad !

5. Economist
   cf48
   

   Wow

   2 weeks ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 0 Vlad !

6. Economist
   d468
   

   Very well said!
   -Shuo

   吵什么呢？人家成功了抓到老鼠了，你们不去学习经验，在这里嫉妒泼脏水，有什么意思？

   2 weeks ago # QUOTE 1 Volod 0 Vlad !

7. Economist
   6277
   

   无非就是没有控制固定效应
   无非就是大运河关闭年份不对

   不过还是发了APSR和AER

   张泰苏，有什么发表吗？

   21 hours ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 0 Vlad !

8. Economist
   fbdf
   

   Wow, Hku 一堆造假的伪学者，无耻

   5 hours ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 0 Vlad !

9. Economist
   6d87
   

   Wow, Hku 一堆造假的伪学者，无耻

   who?

   2 hours ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 0 Vlad !

10. Economist
    6d87
    

    James Kung, Shuo Chen and Yiming Cao should be ashamed of themselves. They ruin the reputation of all Chinese economic historians.

    totally agree

    2 hours ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 0 Vlad !

Reply

Post <blockquote>appalling it is clear that english journals have no ability to identify good research on china. recent good pubs all have data manuniplation or faking problem...</blockquote>

Send Post »

Markup: a blockquote code em strong ul ol li.