Complete Captcha
Loading..
Economist 74d3
Kung老师显然日了你妈，不然怎么会有你这种为造假洗地的孝子贤孙？
Kung老师日 你妈了吗？天天黑他！再黑我们全师门上阵一起去日 你家！
Economist 1dab
bump
Economist 4b1b
吵什么呢？人家成功了抓到老鼠了，你们不去学习经验，在这里嫉妒泼脏水，有什么意思？
Economist e1ef
Xiumin Martin才是yin贱，舔白吊给白吊日比，背信弃义数典忘祖改姓，抄袭中文论文学术不端
Economist cf48
Wow
Economist d468
Very well said! -Shuo
Post <blockquote>Maybe. But until then, CL is a suspect, while JK is a proven fraud. <blockquote>most of CL's papers can't be replicated. people just didn't report him. sooner or later these trash will be reported. <blockquote>No, he is not. CL is probably a p-hacker, but has he ever literally faked data and misreported regression results? JK has been caught repeatedly for these extreme fraudulent activities. <blockquote>come on, CL is much worse than JK </blockquote> </blockquote></blockquote></blockquote>
Send Post »
Markup: a blockquote code em strong ul ol li.
a blockquote code em strong ul ol li