Complete Captcha
Loading..
Economist ebd1
Never forgive, never forget Where is the table that show the related information? In the current version, I cannot find it.. It was deleted.. corrupt.
Never forgive, never forget
Where is the table that show the related information? In the current version, I cannot find it..
It was deleted.. corrupt.
Someone reported the link
Economist 5877
Someone please post the complete link
Economist c780
Very good people on this list
Give them some awards
Economist 7a7f
Link is broke
Economist 265a
TC, JS and NJ at Emory all have terrible numbers. Place has a well deserved reputation for being nasty
Hope WJ turns the place around
Economist a2e5
Remember these names
Post Please look at the last table of the following appendix: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3722314 I was surprised to see this file/paper with all the list of referees and the % of acceptance per referee. Now it is clear that: 1. There are some referees that reject everything (for example - 61 rejection and zero acceptance) - someone we refer to their paper actually kill his/her research. 2. You cannot become an editor without accepting some papers. 3. There are senior referees with 25% and 30% acceptance rate and other with less than 5%. The chief editor knows the distribution before assigning a paper to a referee. 4. All single reports end up in a rejection. 5. What about privacy? is it legal to publish such a list?
Please look at the last table of the following appendix: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3722314 I was surprised to see this file/paper with all the list of referees and the % of acceptance per referee. Now it is clear that: 1. There are some referees that reject everything (for example - 61 rejection and zero acceptance) - someone we refer to their paper actually kill his/her research. 2. You cannot become an editor without accepting some papers. 3. There are senior referees with 25% and 30% acceptance rate and other with less than 5%. The chief editor knows the distribution before assigning a paper to a referee. 4. All single reports end up in a rejection. 5. What about privacy? is it legal to publish such a list?
Send Post »
Markup: a blockquote code em strong ul ol li.
a blockquote code em strong ul ol li