Complete Captcha

• 1 year - 69 posts - Latest - RSS
• Thread: 62 Goods vs 35 No Goods

1. Economist
   961d
   

   Finance folks, how do you rank these three and what is the rank of your department?

   1 year ago # QUOTE 2 GOOD 0 NO GOOD !

2. Economist
   207b
   

   so many threads on this... but hey, let's do it again...

   Now: JFQA~MS~>RF
   In 3 years: RF~MS~>JFQA

   1 year ago # QUOTE 5 GOOD 2 NO GOOD !

3. Economist
   8b6c
   

   Each are better than the other. Or worse. Perhaps both

   1 year ago # QUOTE 2 GOOD 0 NO GOOD !

4. Economist
   3395
   

   FTFY

   so many threads on this... but hey, let's do it again...
   Now: JFQA~MS~>RF
   In 3 years: JFQA~MS~>RF

   1 year ago # QUOTE 0 GOOD 0 NO GOOD !

5. Economist
   dbad
   

   MS>RoF~JFQA

   1 year ago # QUOTE 2 GOOD 2 NO GOOD !

6. Economist
   8ec2
   

   What about the Journal of Empirical Finance?

   1 year ago # QUOTE 1 GOOD 2 NO GOOD !

7. Economist
   c536
   

   It is meaningless to compare them. They are almost the same, i.e., JFQA = MS = ROF

   1 year ago # QUOTE 0 GOOD 1 NO GOOD !

8. Economist
   4e70
   

   JFQA>MS>>ROF

   1 year ago # QUOTE 0 GOOD 5 NO GOOD !

9. Economist
   31f0
   

   MS has by far the best set of finance editors of the three.

   1 year ago # QUOTE 3 GOOD 0 NO GOOD !

10. Economist
    7a17
    

    JF JFE RFS = Top5

    RF MS JFQA = Top fields

    Any bibliometrics say so. Recruiting and tenure committees behave consistently.

    1 year ago # QUOTE 0 GOOD 0 NO GOOD !

11. Economist
    be24
    

    Not sure,
    many still use expression Top 4 for finance journals and that top 4 is JFQA.

    JF JFE RFS = Top5
    RF MS JFQA = Top fields
    Any bibliometrics say so. Recruiting and tenure committees behave consistently.

    1 year ago # QUOTE 0 GOOD 2 NO GOOD !

12. Economist
    7a17
    

    Not sure,
    many still use expression Top 4 for finance journals and that top 4 is JFQA.

    No. It is not true.

    1 year ago # QUOTE 0 GOOD 0 NO GOOD !

13. Economist
    7f40
    

    MS is clearly the best

    1 year ago # QUOTE 0 GOOD 0 NO GOOD !

14. Economist
    3395
    

    There is only a top three in finance. But it is fair to say JFQA gets special treatment in many tenure decisions outside the top schools. For example many tenure committees say you can substitute one of your A's with a JFQA, but only one.

    1 year ago # QUOTE 1 GOOD 0 NO GOOD !

15. Economist
    ffbb
    

    The above is a bit ambiguous as to whether you can substitute one (and only one) of your A's with a MS?

    Yes or no?

    1 year ago # QUOTE 0 GOOD 0 NO GOOD !

16. Economist
    57ff
    

    I've heard of substituting a JFQA. I've not heard anyone do it with MS. Though it is a positive signal.

    Review of Finance doesn't even enter into the question.

    The above is a bit ambiguous as to whether you can substitute one (and only one) of your A's with a MS?
    Yes or no?

    1 year ago # QUOTE 1 GOOD 0 NO GOOD !

17. Economist
    4401
    

    What's the school ranking you are talking about?

    I've heard of substituting a JFQA. I've not heard anyone do it with MS. Though it is a positive signal.
    Review of Finance doesn't even enter into the question.

    1 year ago # QUOTE 0 GOOD 0 NO GOOD !

18. Economist
    ffbb
    

    ^^ I've heard of the substitution at UNSW finance, but that's only because Masulis never published 1 paper at MS and has many pubs at JFQA... I suspect it's not a general case at all, but I could be wrong (?)

    1 year ago # QUOTE 0 GOOD 0 NO GOOD !

19. Economist
    5adb
    

    RoF > MS> JFQA

    1 year ago # QUOTE 0 GOOD 4 NO GOOD !

20. Economist
    dfe0
    

    In my department RF~MS> Jfqa . Jfqa went down

    RoF > MS> JFQA

    1 year ago # QUOTE 1 GOOD 0 NO GOOD !

Reply »