Almagro paper has serious issues. Ambitious topic, but not sure how this is slipping through. Presentation slides seemed under-baked relative to the sale...
Why did Booth make her an offer? Baffling.
JM stars 2020
-
Almagro paper has serious issues. Ambitious topic, but not sure how this is slipping through. Presentation slides seemed under-baked relative to the sale...
All her work is co-authored.
What's so funny about this sentiment is that, in reality, unless you have a date monkey on a paper, coauthors tend to slow things down. I've only ever used them for politics because it's rare that you actually build a synergy with a team...
-
The only other time I see it work is when one person really skilled with empirical tools and the other an expert with theory.
Almagro paper has serious issues. Ambitious topic, but not sure how this is slipping through. Presentation slides seemed under-baked relative to the sale...
All her work is co-authored.
What's so funny about this sentiment is that, in reality, unless you have a date monkey on a paper, coauthors tend to slow things down. I've only ever used them for politics because it's rare that you actually build a synergy with a team...
-
I think the co author gold rush hasn’t really led to better JMPs. The argument in favour is that the field is now specialised, breakthroughs require so much time that you need the coauthor for novel publishable papers 5-6 years into your PhD.
But in my department(HRM/increasingly MRM) there hasn’t been a trend of the coauthored JMPs being better at all, mostly it just means overkill online appendices filled with inane proofs and tables which are formatted very well