Close

Complete Captcha

• 1 week - 17 posts - Latest - RSS
• Thread: 5 Goods vs 1 No Goods

1. Economist
   e226
   

   I have an applied paper in labor economics. I am trying to submit it to one of them. Which one is relatively easier to get published?

   1 week ago # QUOTE 0 Good 0 No Good !

2. Economist
   eb61
   

   Jhr, though neither is easy to publish in

   1 week ago # QUOTE 0 Good 0 No Good !

3. Economist
   f563
   

   jole is a different tier from jhr and harder by transivity

   1 week ago # QUOTE 0 Good 1 No Good !

4. Economist
   9dff
   

   Most journals publish acceptance rates.

   1 week ago # QUOTE 0 Good 0 No Good !

5. Economist
   e226
   

   Which one is easier to get in?

   1 week ago # QUOTE 0 Good 0 No Good !

6. Economist
   a0be
   

   Both have rejection rates >95%. They also publish very different papers.

   1 week ago # QUOTE 2 Good 0 No Good !

7. Economist
   5c8c
   

   If your paper is more structural/technical then I'd go with JOLE, if reduced form then JHR. This is not a hard rule because I have a reduced form paper in JOLE, but is my general sense.

   1 week ago # QUOTE 1 Good 0 No Good !

8. Economist
   4ce5
   

   If you don't have a Chicago connection, then forget about JLE.

   1 week ago # QUOTE 0 Good 0 No Good !

9. Economist
   e226
   

   Is JOLE so clubby?

   1 week ago # QUOTE 0 Good 0 No Good !

10. Economist
    5c8c
    

    JOLE is more clubby than JHR, but it isn't that bad. I have absolutely no Chicago connection (at VLRM) and got in, but admittedly that is N=1.

    1 week ago # QUOTE 1 Good 0 No Good !

11. Economist
    466f
    

    I was happy not to get desk rejected by JHR. But i did get rejected.

    1 week ago # QUOTE 1 Good 0 No Good !

12. Economist
    0acf
    

    Isn't Paul Oyer editor?

    If you don't have a Chicago connection, then forget about JLE.

    1 week ago # QUOTE 0 Good 0 No Good !

13. Economist
    11be
    

    Yes. ^

    1 week ago # QUOTE 0 Good 0 No Good !

14. Economist
    a39f
    

    This is an old discussion, but I do not see any consensus about which one is better.

    1 week ago # QUOTE 0 Good 0 No Good !

15. Economist
    5c8c
    

    If I had to choose, I'd rather have a JOLE. One big benefit to JHR is a high desk-reject rate and generally a quicker turnaround than JOLE. Though this has gotten better in recent years.

    1 week ago # QUOTE 0 Good 0 No Good !

16. Economist
    f341
    

    This is an old discussion, but I do not see any consensus about which one is better.

    Let them wrestle naked in the light of an open fire.

    1 week ago # QUOTE 0 Good 0 No Good !

17. Economist
    a39f
    

    I heard from my advisor JOLE is only for HRM people (e.g., D. Card, R. Frey, etc). LRM peple is automatically desk-rejected and today only HRM peple is submetting there.

    JHR is more fair and open to LRM people, so unsurprisingly many LRM are publishing there today.

    So, if you are LRM, then submitt to JHR.

    (as a illustration: check how many JHR Card or Frey have)

    1 week ago # QUOTE 0 Good 0 No Good !

Reply

Post

Send Post »

Markup: a blockquote code em strong ul ol li.