Close

Complete Captcha

• 1 year - 570 posts - Latest - RSS
• Thread: 1681 Goods vs 391 No Goods

1. Economist
   d56c
   

   This paper pales in comparison to Sraffa (1926).

   2 months ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 0 Vlad !

2. Economist
   2b2e
   

   Any updates on this?

   1 month ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 0 Vlad !

3. Economist
   4476
   

   Has Econometrica done anything about that?

   1 month ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 0 Vlad !

4. Economist
   b3c8
   

   Unfortunatley not, afaik.

   1 month ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 0 Vlad !

5. Economist
   ce96
   

   Unfortunatley not, afaik.

   Literally nothing? Not even a corrigendum?

   4 weeks ago # QUOTE 3 Volod 0 Vlad !

6. Economist
   882c
   

   Terrible.

   4 weeks ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 0 Vlad !

7. Economist
   1724
   

   Now that restud retracted Giuliano's, econometrica has to man up if they want to be a serious outlet. Honestly, if they don't retract this p o s, it's a big reputational hit

   2 weeks ago # QUOTE 1 Volod 0 Vlad !

8. Economist
   f82e
   

   Are bandit problems useful at all? Why do theorists insist on being irrelevant

   Holy fook you are dense, are there seriously 5 economists clueless enough to think think this is a good comment and upvote?

   2 weeks ago # QUOTE 2 Volod 0 Vlad !

9. Economist
   1724
   

   Are bandit problems useful at all? Why do theorists insist on being irrelevant

   Holy fook you are dense, are there seriously 5 economists clueless enough to think think this is a good comment and upvote?

   Some sociologist misalocated to an econ department under 'applied micro'

   2 weeks ago # QUOTE 1 Volod 0 Vlad !

10. Economist
    a644
    

    https://www.econjobrumors.com/topic/feelings-integers-perfectly-encapsulates-whats-wrong-with-economics

    2 weeks ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 0 Vlad !

Reply

Post <blockquote>Second rate, failed mathematicians</blockquote>

Send Post »

Markup: a blockquote code em strong ul ol li.