https://twitter.com/Bellmanequation/status/1483159044277866509
https://showmethemath.org/2022/01/dsice-dynamic-stochastic-integration-of-climate-and-economy/
Story:
KJ does not want to do some minor-to-do but important things asked by the referees, tells the referees that they have poor judgement. Pisses everyone off with attitude. Editor points out that without these changes the paper won't get published. KJ says then remove my name, the co-authors do the changes, and get a chance to publish the paper.
I do not see any wrong-doing by JPE.
Story:
KJ does not want to do some minor-to-do but important things asked by the referees, tells the referees that they have poor judgement. Pisses everyone off with attitude. Editor points out that without these changes the paper won't get published. KJ says then remove my name, the co-authors do the changes, and get a chance to publish the paper.
I do not see any wrong-doing by JPE.
Ok, but how does KJ communicate this to the referees? In the letter replies? What do the other authors have to say about this?
Story:
KJ does not want to do some minor-to-do but important things asked by the referees, tells the referees that they have poor judgement. Pisses everyone off with attitude. Editor points out that without these changes the paper won't get published. KJ says then remove my name, the co-authors do the changes, and get a chance to publish the paper.
I do not see any wrong-doing by JPE.
Sounds made up. The coauthor could have these petty changes anyway, why remove his name?
Ken Judd has always been such an amazing person.I would not go that far. He's a bit of a d1ck with those he disagrees with. I agree he has virtues, much moreso than most people in this profession. But I wouldn't want to be his friend.
He's a straight talker that's all. He is not always right. I've seen people shut him down at conferences including myself, when he's been wrong. He is rarely wrong.
Ken Judd has always been such an amazing person.I would not go that far. He's a bit of a d1ck with those he disagrees with. I agree he has virtues, much moreso than most people in this profession. But I wouldn't want to be his friend.
He's a straight talker that's all. He is not always right. I've seen people shut him down at conferences including myself, when he's been wrong. He is rarely wrong.
I know who you are. I will be coming for you.
Ken Judd has always been such an amazing person.
I would not go that far. He's a bit of a d1ck with those he disagrees with. I agree he has virtues, much moreso than most people in this profession. But I wouldn't want to be his friend.
He's a straight talker that's all. He is not always right. I've seen people shut him down at conferences including myself, when he's been wrong. He is rarely wrong.
I know who you are. I will be coming for you.
Ken is that you? I doubt you do.
I would not go that far. He's a bit of a d1ck with those he disagrees with. I agree he has virtues, much moreso than most people in this profession. But I wouldn't want to be his friend.
He's a straight talker that's all. He is not always right. I've seen people shut him down at conferences including myself, when he's been wrong. He is rarely wrong.
I know who you are. I will be coming for you.
Ken is that you? I doubt you do.
I am from your department.