Close

Complete Captcha

• 7 years - 138 posts - Latest - RSS
• Thread: 557 Goods vs 568 No Goods

1. Economist
   c03a
   

   You are a good guy and I am grateful for the work you have done here. EJMR has been important to me, more so than I should admit.

   Like the most in the audience that this site targets, I am sure that you have better things to do. Tat, for all his faults, faced the same dilemma. He did all of us a favor by passing the site on when he could no longer manage it properly.

   The quality of EJMR has suffered a stunning downfall since the AEAs. Mentally ill trolls dominate. A rogue mod is tolerated. Great threads are vandalized. And worst, complaints are ignored, note that the complaint thread is over 70 posts now.

   Please consider passing the site on to someone who can give it more attention. Most of the mods are awesome, maybe one of them can do it.

   I really don't want to be a pissant here. But I want EJMR to continue for a while longer.

   7 years ago # QUOTE 25 Jab 147 No Jab !

2. Economist
   f189
   

   Even if you retain ownership of the site, please consider letting someone else manage it. Introducing new features and protecting against spammers is wonderful, but it's a lot of wasted effort if all desirable posters are driven away.

   7 years ago # QUOTE 15 Jab 6 No Jab !

3. Economist
   78e7
   

   Piss off, OP.

   This is Kirk's website and you can leave if you want to. Who do you want Kirk to leave the website to? The Koch Brothers--Some other wingnut group.

   7 years ago # QUOTE 5 Jab 24 No Jab !

4. Economist
   143a
   

   I reluctantly agree with OP.

   7 years ago # QUOTE 13 Jab 7 No Jab !

5. Economist
   78e7
   

   Even if you retain ownership of the site, please consider letting someone else manage it. Introducing new features and protecting against spammers is wonderful, but it's a lot of wasted effort if all desirable posters are driven away.

   Which desirable poasters are you referring to?

   7 years ago # QUOTE 3 Jab 15 No Jab !

6. Economist
   6aa5
   

   The question is, has little Jean-Luc matured enough to take over?

   7 years ago # QUOTE 10 Jab 0 No Jab !

7. Economist
   177a
   

   78e7:

   Thank you for so clearly demonstrating the problem with EJMR.

   7 years ago # QUOTE 18 Jab 2 No Jab !

8. Economist
   78e7
   

   78e7:
   Thank you for so clearly demonstrating the problem with EJMR.

   You don't consider it at all rude that you are asking the owner of a website to leave his own website?

   7 years ago # QUOTE 3 Jab 9 No Jab !

9. Economist
   7532
   

   The quality of EJMR has suffered a stunning downfall since the AEAs.

   EJMR quality is procyclical with respect to the job market cycle.

   The correct fix is to smooth the job market cycle, that way we can smooth EJMR quality.

   Do it KORK!!!!

   7 years ago # QUOTE 19 Jab 5 No Jab !

10. Economist
    78e7
    

    This is all about Whoopass Guy and you are taking it out on Kirk because you can't make him bow to your efforts. What a bunch of gutless wonders you are.

    You are not paying any money for this website. If you do not like how it is run, you are more than welcome to leave.

    7 years ago # QUOTE 2 Jab 9 No Jab !

11. Economist
    6d49
    

    exactly right, it is kirk's site.

    kirk please decide who you want here. Me, an AP who came here in 2008 when I went on the market. Or this guy. Because I will not stay without some real changes.

    Piss off, OP.
    This is Kirk's website and you can leave if you want to. Who do you want Kirk to leave the website to? The Koch Brothers--Some other wingnut group.

    7 years ago # QUOTE 16 Jab 2 No Jab !

12. Economist
    78e7
    

    The quality of EJMR has suffered a stunning downfall since the AEAs.
    EJMR quality is procyclical with respect to the job market cycle.
    The correct fix is to smooth the job market cycle, that way we can smooth EJMR quality.
    Do it KORK!!!!

    We all want jobs and those of us with jobs, we want better jobs.

    7 years ago # QUOTE 3 Jab 4 No Jab !

13. Economist
    78e7
    

    exactly right, it is kirk's site.
    kirk please decide who you want here. Me, an AP who came here in 2008 when I went on the market. Or this guy. Because I will not stay without some real changes.
    Piss off, OP.
    This is Kirk's website and you can leave if you want to. Who do you want Kirk to leave the website to? The Koch Brothers--Some other wingnut group.

    Oooo, you became an AP in 2008, I am so impressed--Not.

    7 years ago # QUOTE 2 Jab 14 No Jab !

14. Economist
    e54c
    

    It's impossible to have a conversation on this website without this troll making an appearance.

    7 years ago # QUOTE 11 Jab 2 No Jab !

15. Economist
    063c
    

    Let me get back to you after my jet lands and these bikini models get off my lap.

    - Kork

    7 years ago # QUOTE 3 Jab 1 No Jab !

16. Economist
    c03a
    

    Ordinarily yes. But Tat gave the site to Kirk for free on the condition that he keep it going in decent form. With Kirk no longer able to keep it in a good condition, I think it is reasonable to ask this of him.

    78e7:
    Thank you for so clearly demonstrating the problem with EJMR.

    You don't consider it at all rude that you are asking the owner of a website to leave his own website?

    7 years ago # QUOTE 8 Jab 4 No Jab !

17. Economist
    78e7
    

    Ordinarily yes. But Tat gave the site to Kirk for free on the condition that he keep it going in decent form. With Kirk no longer able to keep it in a good condition, I think it is reasonable to ask this of him.
    78e7:
    Thank you for so clearly demonstrating the problem with EJMR.
    You don't consider it at all rude that you are asking the owner of a website to leave his own website?

    You want Tat back, you traitor. You are not good enough to be here on EJMR due to your lack of loyalty.

    7 years ago # QUOTE 2 Jab 6 No Jab !

18. Economist
    78e7
    

    It's impossible to have a conversation on this website without this troll making an appearance.

    Someone needs to stand up to you assholes even though it is annoying.

    My silence would be seen as a form of acceptance of your behavior which I refuse to give you.

    7 years ago # QUOTE 1 Jab 9 No Jab !

19. MCROAGSVbro
    Rep: 10

    I second OP. Even if Kirk doesn't want to sell the site, may be he should think of getting some mods who are actually in the profession and at least have a PhD.

    Wake up Kirk before you piss one of us enough so that we go and make a competing site.

    7 years ago # QUOTE 7 Jab 8 No Jab !

20. Economist
    378a
    

    I have been here for years. Worst it has been. By a lot.

    7 years ago # QUOTE 8 Jab 2 No Jab !

Topic Closed

This topic has been closed to new replies.