OP had around 30 good and 2 nogood, and people were expressing concerns about her paper, not much more. Why taking this down?
Kirk, why the discussion of MD's jmp was taken down?
-
Kirk, I am a MRM and my name appeared here and I got critized quite a bit. I dont find it fair that her thread got deleted but if you google my name, you have the link to the EJMR post on my name...
Btw, I am a big fan of her and especially her mita paper. The comment on her JMP were valid in my opinion. It is good but less than the mita paper...
-
if you do nit your name linked on Google to Ejmr in a negative way, you have the right to ask the thread to be deleted. Now if you choose not to exercise your right you should not be whinning if others do.
Kirk, I am a MRM and my name appeared here and I got critized quite a bit. I dont find it fair that her thread got deleted but if you google my name, you have the link to the EJMR post on my name...
Btw, I am a big fan of her and especially her mita paper. The comment on her JMP were valid in my opinion. It is good but less than the mita paper... -
BTW, Kirk, you should create a special button that automatically posts this video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TZ860P4iTaM
To state that the guys keep on hitting on the same key like some autistic kid and they fail to realize that they can play with a lot more piano keys out there.