Close

Complete Captcha

• 6 months - 38 posts - Latest - RSS
• Thread: 60 Goods vs 53 No Goods

1. Economist
   2b3f
   

   https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/russian-nukes-can-be-used-defend-annexed-ukraine-regions-kremlin-warns
   This is why Russia has encouraged the leaders in the four regions to hold the referenda quickly and soon starting with the first referendum tomorrow. The moment the vote is counted the disputed regions will be considered part of Russia (should the citizens vote as expected), giving Russia a justification for the use of tactical nuk3s.

   Heh. This genius actually thinks there will a “vote” that is “counted”. So very, very d00m/b.

   Also, "leaders in the four regions"

   LMAO

   6 months ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 1 Vlad !

2. Economist
   248f
   

   Bring it on, Boris. Why would anyone fear Russia now? Why would anyone take Russia at face value after all the li/es?

   6 months ago # QUOTE 2 Volod 0 Vlad !

3. Economist
   5f9b
   

   Russia's n3kes are completely fake and do not work. Let them fire thousands of them off, and none of them will hit. Slavic races have just an avg IQ of 90, they are mentally much closer to Africans than Ytes. Spiritually, Slav lands like Russia and Ukraine are just Africa, but wrapped in lighter skin. Russ1a has infrastructure just as primitive as sub-Saharan Africa, and the less is said about Ukraine the better.

   6 months ago # QUOTE 1 Volod 8 Vlad !

4. Economist
   a7e9
   

   Dmitry Peskov has confirmed that the regions will immediately be part of Russia after the referenda should the vote results be in favor of joining Russia.

   https://tass.com/politics/1512201

   https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/russian-nukes-can-be-used-defend-annexed-ukraine-regions-kremlin-warns
   This is why Russia has encouraged the leaders in the four regions to hold the referenda quickly and soon starting with the first referendum tomorrow. The moment the vote is counted the disputed regions will be considered part of Russia (should the citizens vote as expected), giving Russia a justification for the use of tactical nuk3s.

   6 months ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 0 Vlad !

5. Economist
   613e
   

   Rather Lviv

   So they will irradiate the regions they are defending? Or just hit some random 'NATO' city because...?

   They will hit Kiev

   6 months ago # QUOTE 3 Volod 0 Vlad !

6. Economist
   9ad6
   

   Boris stop saber rattling. NATO has already said that any type of nuclear device or dirty bomb or nuclear plant accident in the territory of Ukraine as defined by the UN 2013msps is a definitive red line. Your threats aren't going to change any red line.
   Now do you want to cross the red line and see the consequences or are just going to keep on aimlessly saber rattling thinking that'll make a difference.

   Is it a “definitive red line” like when BO said Syria’s using chemical weapons was a red line?

   I’m sure the Rooskis are scared by the red line. B is about as likely to send US troops/pilots into Ukraine as he is to set Jill up with Ime Udoka.

   6 months ago # QUOTE 2 Volod 0 Vlad !

7. Economist
   248f
   

   Boris stop saber rattling. NATO has already said that any type of nuclear device or dirty bomb or nuclear plant accident in the territory of Ukraine as defined by the UN 2013msps is a definitive red line. Your threats aren't going to change any red line.
   Now do you want to cross the red line and see the consequences or are just going to keep on aimlessly saber rattling thinking that'll make a difference.

   Is it a “definitive red line” like when BO said Syria’s using chemical weapons was a red line?
   I’m sure the Rooskis are scared by the red line. B is about as likely to send US troops/pilots into Ukraine as he is to set Jill up with Ime Udoka.

   B has outplayed Putin at every step so far though. Boris coping hard!

   6 months ago # QUOTE 1 Volod 2 Vlad !

8. Economist
   9738
   

   "Western support to Ukraine increases this autumn, with new weapons systems and larger quantities of the weapons already deployed. Western intelligence gives the Ukrainians an even sharper edge against a Russian force that is large but poorly trained, under-equipped and demoralized. The Russian military takes heavy losses. It’s routed from one of the Ukrainian regions it has annexed.

   In this scenario, Putin’s grand project is now collapsing once and for all. ... So he strikes Ukrainian forces with a tactical nuclear weapon in a gamble to underscore the risks, stop the war, and avert disaster for himself. ... After that, de-escalation would be hard."

   https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2022/sep/23/yes-putin-might-use-nuclear-weapons-we-need-to-plan-for-scenarios-where-he-does

   6 months ago # QUOTE 1 Volod 0 Vlad !

9. Economist
   248f
   

   "Western support to Ukraine increases this autumn, with new weapons systems and larger quantities of the weapons already deployed. Western intelligence gives the Ukrainians an even sharper edge against a Russian force that is large but poorly trained, under-equipped and demoralized. The Russian military takes heavy losses. It’s routed from one of the Ukrainian regions it has annexed.
   In this scenario, Putin’s grand project is now collapsing once and for all. ... So he strikes Ukrainian forces with a tactical nuclear weapon in a gamble to underscore the risks, stop the war, and avert disaster for himself. ... After that, de-escalation would be hard."
   https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2022/sep/23/yes-putin-might-use-nuclear-weapons-we-need-to-plan-for-scenarios-where-he-does

   Putin goes nuclear, Moscow dies. There is no other scenario.

   6 months ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 1 Vlad !

10. Economist
    c47f
    

    I said it once and I'll say it again: use the Nukes Boris... But you must accept the consequences of crossing that red line

    6 months ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 0 Vlad !

11. Economist
    932f
    

    Pvtin is reported to be slowly dying of cancer. This could just be Western pr0paganda, but if it is true then he may be more willing to use nuk3s in a total war scenario rather than face def3at. He has stated thar a world without a proud Russia in it is not a world worth having at all. Also keep in mind that Pvtin and many of the rest of the W6rld Ec6nomic F6rum global elites have deep underground bunkers to survive a nuc1ear war. A total nuc1ear war would reduce what the elites view as a global "overpopulation" issue. The civilians would d1e en masse, allowing the elites to build their dream new world from the ashes.

    Well, till now we have only one country who used nukes (on civil ppls btw).
    And very few(from the same side) who used chemical weaps.

    In both cases we don't see Ruskkies there.

    Though i have to agree with your general line. Ruskkies are fatalists. Even ordinary folks.

    And those dunnbheads who say rubbish and underestimate their nukes potential are complete elstu pidos. Actually they are the best in both nuclear and nuke tech today (including delivery options).

    6 months ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 0 Vlad !

12. Economist
    a7e9
    

    We will all face the consequences of that. The Russian people would d1e but so would we.

    I said it once and I'll say it again: use the Nukes Boris... But you must accept the consequences of crossing that red line

    6 months ago # QUOTE 1 Volod 0 Vlad !

13. Economist
    521a
    

    Of course not.

    They would nuke Kiev first. But then NATO would take over and get all of Ukraine back. And at that point, what would Russia do? Immolate their own by attacking Berlin, London, Paris, or NYC?

    We will all face the consequences of that. The Russian people would d1e but so would we.

    I said it once and I'll say it again: use the Nukes Boris... But you must accept the consequences of crossing that red line
    

    5 months ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 1 Vlad !

14. Economist
    4aa6
    

    No, after Kiev is struck, westoids would sheit their pants and stfu, like the сUСКs you are

    Of course not.
    They would nuke Kiev first. But then NATO would take over and get all of Ukraine back. And at that point, what would Russia do? Immolate their own by attacking Berlin, London, Paris, or NYC?

    We will all face the consequences of that. The Russian people would d1e but so would we.

    I said it once and I'll say it again: use the Nukes Boris... But you must accept the consequences of crossing that red line
    

    5 months ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 0 Vlad !

15. Economist
    db0d
    

    https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-63021118

    5 months ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 0 Vlad !

16. Economist
    4aa6
    

    ВВС is for you mОm

    https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-63021118

    5 months ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 0 Vlad !

17. Economist
    db0d
    

    Go back to the zoo.

    ВВС is for you mОm

    https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-63021118
    

    5 months ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 0 Vlad !

18. Economist
    2013
    

    One nuke on Kiev wil force Ukraine to capitulate. What else could Ukraine or NATO do in that situation?

    Easy. NATO could claim some increase in radiation readings in Poland, Romania, whatever. Then, because NATO was attacked, it could respond in kind, using its air supremacy to wipe out the pathetic militias in LPR/DPR so that the Ukrainian army takes those lands over.
    Then, that same Ukrainian army would use the 300km-range missiles they already have in store to wipe out the land bridge between Russia and Crimea. Add some F-16/F-35 raids to it, and Crimea is back in Ukraines hands in no time.
    What could Russia do? Well, it could throw away its own existence out of spite for not having those lands, but even Putin, Peskov and the likes of them are not THAT stupid.

    You glorified your own end. Congratulations.

    5 months ago # QUOTE 1 Volod 0 Vlad !

Reply

Post

Send Post »

Markup: a blockquote code em strong ul ol li.