Close

Complete Captcha

• 1 year - 50 posts - Latest - RSS
• Thread: 99 Goods vs 103 No Goods

1. Economist
   def0
   

   Perfect example of Karl’s journalistic and scholarly professionalism:

   1) state an unsupported conclusion in the title as if it was established fact.

   2) provide a list of evidence that doesn’t support the unproven conclusion, and pretend it does.

   3) Ask anonymous non-college educated rtards who had never previously heard of his hit-target for more unsubstantiated rumors and non-evidence he can use to support his false conclusion.

   4) throw it all into a verbose, rambling , poorly written blog post, then repeatedly congratulate himself as being the lone shining beacon of truth in a “profession” in which he has never belonged to.

   This

   1 year ago # QUOTE 12 Volod 0 Vlad !

2. Economist
   a748
   

   This is a hard one. Which one of two disgusting characters to support?

   1 year ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 0 Vlad !

3. Economist
   e3f6
   

   The list paper is embarrassing…. For List

   List paper really is an embarrassment
   Ah found it: http://datacolada.org/7

   1 year ago # QUOTE 1 Volod 0 Vlad !

4. Economist
   9c1b
   

   What is the modified shredder story

   1 year ago # QUOTE 1 Volod 0 Vlad !

5. Karl
   Rep: -88

   What is the modified shredder story

   Here is a blog about it:

   http://fraudbytes.blogspot.com/2021/08/top-honesty-researcher-dan-ariely-has.html?m=1

   "We were unable to break any teeth on the shredders we purchased but ended up finding a way to remove some of the teeth in the center by taking the shredder apart. Unfortunately, when we did this the papers would no longer go through the shredder without getting turned to one side or another and they inevitably got stuck because the shredder no longer had enough teeth to pull them through. We concluded that it was impossible to modify any of the shredders we bought and I filed the entire experience in my mind by putting an asterisk next to Dan Ariely's name as someone who made a claim regarding his research that seems potentially suspicious.
   "

   1 year ago # QUOTE 1 Volod 16 Vlad !

6. Economist
   9c1b
   

   https://www.elsevier.com/connect/editors-update/a-fascinating-experiment-into-measuring-dishonesty

   I feel like such a shredder could exist. It would need to make fake shredding noises though.

   1 year ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 0 Vlad !

7. Economist
   9c1b
   

   ^ Actually the link above shows the pages shredded on the sides only. But why so jagged if shredders usually cut so neatly.

   1 year ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 0 Vlad !

8. Economist
   d67f
   

   the most bizarre part of this story is that an experiment with 40000 subjects that must have cost more than 200k was never formally written up and published.

   1 year ago # QUOTE 1 Volod 0 Vlad !

9. Economist
   cb49
   

   Karl, do not get discouraged by the comment about you. They just want you to stop writing about them.

   1 year ago # QUOTE 5 Volod 4 Vlad !

10. Economist
    f58c
    

    He has 400 papers. There is more fabricated data out there.

    1 year ago # QUOTE 2 Volod 0 Vlad !

11. Economist
    dd9b
    

    He has 400 papers. There is more fabricated data out there.

    His is true if, and only if, he is truly a fraudster. It which case, if Karl had the intelligence and knowledge, he could quite quickly review the data and stats in a sub-sample of those 400 papers, and find much more evidence to support his claims of fraud.

    Another way to look at it is, that nobody, none of the thousands of reviewers, editors, readers, or anyone out there who had tried to replicate his data, has found evidence of fraud thus far in those +400 papers. Ergo, the evidence is far stronger that he is not a fraudster than that he is.

    1 year ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 2 Vlad !

12. Economist
    4198
    

    I would just prefer that he stop pretending he's applying any kind of honesty, scholarship, or journalistic standard to his horribly written troiI-hit-pieces.

    And I don't really even mind if he doesn't, since it's so transparently obvious to anyone with an lQ above 80 what he's doing.

    It doesn't even matter, since nobody who matters in academia cares about what maguh-larping kid who failed his attempt to get into grad school writes in his poorly thought-out bash-rants.

    Karl, do not get discouraged by the comment about you. They just want you to stop writing about them.

    1 year ago # QUOTE 3 Volod 3 Vlad !

13. Economist
    e3f6
    

    People have already z curved his work- Schimmack used him as an example I think way back in the day. But his methods are more about the quality of the evidence in the papers, not so much about whether the data are fraudulent:

    He has 400 papers. There is more fabricated data out there.

    His is true if, and only if, he is truly a fraudster. It which case, if Karl had the intelligence and knowledge, he could quite quickly review the data and stats in a sub-sample of those 400 papers, and find much more evidence to support his claims of fraud.
    Another way to look at it is, that nobody, none of the thousands of reviewers, editors, readers, or anyone out there who had tried to replicate his data, has found evidence of fraud thus far in those +400 papers. Ergo, the evidence is far stronger that he is not a fraudster than that he is.

    1 year ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 0 Vlad !

14. Economist
    fab9
    

    ………………………………………………-‘’#: #’’-,
    ………………………………………………#|#: (@) :#:#
    ……………………………………………………-,,_ # :,-
    …………………………………………………………;; ; ;
    …………………………………………………………; ;; ; ; ;
    …………………………………………………………; ; ; ; ; ;; ;; ;
    ………………………………………………………; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;; ;
    …………………………………………………; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;; ; ; ; ; ;
    ………………….._,,-~’’’¯¯¯’’~-,… ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;
    ………………..,-‘’ ; ; ;_,,---,,_ ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;
    ……………….,’ ; ; ;,-‘ , , , , , ‘~~--~~--~~--~~--~~--~~--~~--~~--~~--~~; ;__;’-,
    ……………….| ; ; ;,’ , , , _,,-~’’ ~~--~~--~~--~~--~~--~~--~~--~~--~~-;,-~’’ , , ‘, ;’,
    ……………….’, ; ; ‘-, ,-~’’ ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;’’-, , , , , ,’ ; |
    …………………’, ; ;,’’ ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;’-, , ,-‘ ;,-‘
    ………………….,’-‘ ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;’’-‘ ;,,-‘
    ………………..,’ ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;__ ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ‘-,’
    ………………,-‘ ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;,-‘’¯: : ’’-, ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; _ ; ; ; ; ;’,
    ……………..,’ ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;| : ( ) : : ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ,-‘’¯: ¯’’-, ; ; ;’,
    …………….,’ ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ‘-,_: : _,-‘ ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; | : ( ) : : ; ; ; |
    ……………,’ ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ¯¯ ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;’-,,_ : :,-‘ ; ; ; ;|
    …………..,-‘ ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ,,-~’’ , , , , ,,,-~~-, , , , _ ; ; ;¯¯ ; ; ; ; ;|
    ..…………,-‘ ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;,’ , , , , , , ,( : : : : , , , ,’’-, ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;|
    ……………-‘ ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;’, , , , , , , , ,’~---~’’ , , , , , ,’ ; ; ; ; ; ;
    ……………’ ; _, ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ‘’~-,,,,--~~’’’¯’’’~-,,_ , ,_,-‘ ; ; ; ; ; ;
    ……………-~’’,-‘ ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;| ; ; | v v v v v . ,’; ,’’¯ ; ; ; ; ; ;
    ……………… ; ;,-, ; ;, ; ; ;, ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ‘, ; ;’, . . . . ., Please kiII yourself Karl. That would make me very happy!
    ………………’ ,-‘-~’’ ‘, ,-‘ ‘, ,,- ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ‘, ; ; ‘~-,,,-‘’ ; ,’ ; ; ; ; ‘, ;,-‘’ ; ‘, ,
    …………,-‘’ ; ; ; ; ; ‘’ ; ; ;’’ ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ‘’-,,_ ; ; ; _,-‘ ; ; ; ; ; ;’-‘’ ; ; ; ‘’ ; ;
    …………,-‘ ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;¯¯’’¯ ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;

    EJMRBEAR©

    1 year ago # QUOTE 10 Volod 1 Vlad !

15. Karl
    Rep: -88

    Bump

    1 year ago # QUOTE 1 Volod 8 Vlad !

16. Economist
    a4b8
    

    ………………………………………………-‘’#: #’’-,
    ………………………………………………#|#: (@) :#:#
    ……………………………………………………-,,_ # :,-
    …………………………………………………………;; ; ;
    …………………………………………………………; ;; ; ; ;
    …………………………………………………………; ; ; ; ; ;; ;; ;
    ………………………………………………………; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;; ;
    …………………………………………………; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;; ; ; ; ; ;
    ………………….._,,-~’’’¯¯¯’’~-,… ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;
    ………………..,-‘’ ; ; ;_,,---,,_ ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;
    ……………….,’ ; ; ;,-‘ , , , , , ‘~~--~~--~~--~~--~~--~~--~~--~~--~~--~~; ;__;’-,
    ……………….| ; ; ;,’ , , , _,,-~’’ ~~--~~--~~--~~--~~--~~--~~--~~--~~-;,-~’’ , , ‘, ;’,
    ……………….’, ; ; ‘-, ,-~’’ ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;’’-, , , , , ,’ ; |
    …………………’, ; ;,’’ ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;’-, , ,-‘ ;,-‘
    ………………….,’-‘ ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;’’-‘ ;,,-‘
    ………………..,’ ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;__ ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ‘-,’
    ………………,-‘ ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;,-‘’¯: : ’’-, ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; _ ; ; ; ; ;’,
    ……………..,’ ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;| : ( ) : : ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ,-‘’¯: ¯’’-, ; ; ;’,
    …………….,’ ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ‘-,_: : _,-‘ ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; | : ( ) : : ; ; ; |
    ……………,’ ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ¯¯ ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;’-,,_ : :,-‘ ; ; ; ;|
    …………..,-‘ ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ,,-~’’ , , , , ,,,-~~-, , , , _ ; ; ;¯¯ ; ; ; ; ;|
    ..…………,-‘ ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;,’ , , , , , , ,( : : : : , , , ,’’-, ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;|
    ……………-‘ ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;’, , , , , , , , ,’~---~’’ , , , , , ,’ ; ; ; ; ; ;
    ……………’ ; _, ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ‘’~-,,,,--~~’’’¯’’’~-,,_ , ,_,-‘ ; ; ; ; ; ;
    ……………-~’’,-‘ ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;| ; ; | v v v v v . ,’; ,’’¯ ; ; ; ; ; ;
    ……………… ; ;,-, ; ;, ; ; ;, ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ‘, ; ;’, . . . . ., EJMR bear here. Bear would like you to kiII yourself Karl. That would make Bear very happy!
    ………………’ ,-‘-~’’ ‘, ,-‘ ‘, ,,- ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ‘, ; ; ‘~-,,,-‘’ ; ,’ ; ; ; ; ‘, ;,-‘’ ; ‘, ,
    …………,-‘’ ; ; ; ; ; ‘’ ; ; ;’’ ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ‘’-,,_ ; ; ; _,-‘ ; ; ; ; ; ;’-‘’ ; ; ; ‘’ ; ;
    …………,-‘ ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;¯¯’’¯ ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;

    EJMRBEAR©

    1 year ago # QUOTE 7 Volod 2 Vlad !

17. Economist
    b434
    

    https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=cold%20carl

    1 year ago # QUOTE 2 Volod 0 Vlad !

18. Economist
    d77f
    

    bump

    1 year ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 0 Vlad !

19. Economist
    f9fa
    

    https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Warm%20Karl

    1 year ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 0 Vlad !

20. Economist
    9198
    

    Perfect example of Karl’s journalistic and scholarly professionalism:

    1) state an unsupported conclusion in the title as if it was established fact.

    2) provide a list of evidence that doesn’t support the unproven conclusion, and pretend it does.

    3) Ask anonymous non-college educated rtards who had never previously heard of his hit-target for more unsubstantiated rumors and non-evidence he can use to support his false conclusion.

    4) throw it all into a verbose, rambling , poorly written blog post, then repeatedly congratulate himself as being the lone shining beacon of truth in a “profession” in which he has never belonged.

    ^ This

    1 year ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 0 Vlad !

Reply »