Close

Complete Captcha

• 6 months - 21 posts - Latest - RSS
• Thread: 87 Goods vs 56 No Goods

1. Economist
   99a1
   

   Some scientific organisation.

   6 months ago # QUOTE 16 Volod 2 Vlad !

2. Economist
   a229
   

   bump

   6 months ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 1 Vlad !

3. Economist
   6feb
   

   there are vulnerable people, re/tahd.

   6 months ago # QUOTE 3 Volod 18 Vlad !

4. Economist
   a229
   

   there are vulnerable people, re/tahd.

   they can wear masks

   6 months ago # QUOTE 11 Volod 2 Vlad !

5. Economist
   0ac3
   

   LOL, I just love to hear all these girly men crying hysterically about having to temporarily use a thin mask. Give me your tears girly men. Give me your tears.

   6 months ago # QUOTE 5 Volod 18 Vlad !

6. Economist
   0ac3
   

   Yes! Yes! 2 Vlads in less than 60 seconds. Give me more tears! MORE TEARS!

   6 months ago # QUOTE 2 Volod 5 Vlad !

7. Economist
   23f7
   

   LOL, I just love to hear all these girly men crying hysterically about having to temporarily use a thin mask. Give me your tears girly men. Give me your tears.

   Why wear something that does nothing except showcase illogical hysteria?

   6 months ago # QUOTE 14 Volod 2 Vlad !

8. Economist
   120e
   

   I saw this guy at a conference wearing a face mask. During the dinner, he was still trying to eat his meal without taking it off. Sad.

   6 months ago # QUOTE 7 Volod 1 Vlad !

9. Economist
   3361
   

   Yes! Yes! 2 Vlads in less than 60 seconds. Give me more tears! MORE TEARS!

   LOL, I just love to hear all these girly men crying hysterically about having to temporarily use a thin mask. Give me your tears girly men. Give me your tears.

   Are you still in kindergarten? Sounds like it. That may explain your fascination with masks.

   6 months ago # QUOTE 1 Volod 1 Vlad !

10. Economist
    a89f
    

    Triple vax, too, I hope. And lots of hand sanitizer.

    6 months ago # QUOTE 2 Volod 1 Vlad !

11. Economist
    a229
    

    This is really crazy. The CDC does not recommend masks. Everyone is vaxxed and boosted.

    At what point do we move on?

    6 months ago # QUOTE 11 Volod 1 Vlad !

12. Economist
    4cfd
    

    are attendees really OK with this? I am super junior (and not a FRF) so I can't say anything. The conformity is mind boggling.

    6 months ago # QUOTE 6 Volod 1 Vlad !

13. Economist
    dec1
    

    To view our safety measures for COVID, please visit nber.org/not-so-scientific-after-all

    6 months ago # QUOTE 2 Volod 1 Vlad !

14. Economist
    0b75
    

    Little China. This is laughable.

    6 months ago # QUOTE 1 Volod 1 Vlad !

15. Economist
    1dde
    

    No one wore masks at the San Francisco meeting, despite requirement.

    6 months ago # QUOTE 1 Volod 0 Vlad !

16. Economist
    464e
    

    LOL, I just love to hear all these girly men crying hysterically about having to temporarily use a thin mask. Give me your tears girly men. Give me your tears.

    LOL, I just love to hear all these girly men crying hysterically about having to temporarily use a thin mask. Give me your tears girly men. Give me your tears.

    Yeah, truly sad how much a mask triggers them.

    6 months ago # QUOTE 1 Volod 0 Vlad !

17. Economist
    464e
    

    are attendees really OK with this? I am super junior (and not a FRF) so I can't say anything. The conformity is mind boggling.

    Really, you are in the most conformist academic discipline with our top 5 journals and top 5 departments and almost completely subjective science, and masks are mind boggling?

    6 months ago # QUOTE 4 Volod 1 Vlad !

18. Economist
    25ad
    

    Economics has to try harder than most fields to “believe the science”, given its lack of scientific rigor.

    6 months ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 0 Vlad !

19. Economist
    7d9d
    

    Bahston bump

    5 months ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 0 Vlad !

20. Economist
    1e36
    

    there are vulnerable people, re/tahd.

    No one has really explained why masks are only effective if both people wear them

    5 months ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 0 Vlad !

Reply »