Complete Captcha
Loading..
Economist 3ae8
*framing
Yes, all about farming To get in they need to like your topic or they like you, but they don't read your paper to know the actual quality. Just a different beast even if it's equally hard to get in.
Yes, all about farming
To get in they need to like your topic or they like you, but they don't read your paper to know the actual quality. Just a different beast even if it's equally hard to get in.
Economist 2b4b
I cannot find the first week’s videos on YouTube any more.
Economist 0f81
They said they wouldn't be up forever.
Economist 67ed
excited for today's methods section
Economist 4e61
How did it go?
Economist 6e87
bump
Economist c987
methods section last year was good!
Economist df8b
Which group has the highest bar? Which is the most clubby? Just curious.
Economist a34a
Which groups are the most influential?
Economist 1706
AP results out
Economist 6e59
Is this clubby too? https://twitter.com/restatjournal/status/1513892191898423298
Economist 2d63
Just another way to do DEI. But there are also excellent researchers who are not URM, who would support them to break the ceiling glass?
Economist 2f43
This stinks of ageism
Post EFMM is the most corrupt group. From a quick glance: - Organizer accepts his student and coauthors paper (BM, SM) - Organizer accepts his coauthor paper (MA) and his own paper (EH)! - Paper presented last year appears again on the program (JC et al). I am honestly wondering if these people are even trying to hide or not because they are untouchable.
EFMM is the most corrupt group. From a quick glance: - Organizer accepts his student and coauthors paper (BM, SM) - Organizer accepts his coauthor paper (MA) and his own paper (EH)! - Paper presented last year appears again on the program (JC et al). I am honestly wondering if these people are even trying to hide or not because they are untouchable.
Send Post »
Markup: a blockquote code em strong ul ol li.
a blockquote code em strong ul ol li