Close

Complete Captcha

• 6 years - 5771 posts - Latest - RSS
• Thread: 21365 Goods vs 5964 No Goods

1. Economist
   0a25
   

   How can Persson still walk around with a straight face and claim novelty in her work (as she did in the Swedish newspaper interview)?

   5 years ago # QUOTE 12 Volod 0 Vlad !

2. Economist
   f353
   

   This thread is awash with LRM tears. "OMG.. how dare she ignore our thread! This is a scandal" You clowns are clueless. This will have zero impact on either authors' career. The paper was accepted at the AER and that's the end of that.

   5 years ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 18 Vlad !

3. Economist
   55d5
   

   This thread is awash with LRM tears. "OMG.. how dare she ignore our thread! This is a scandal" You clowns are clueless. This will have zero impact on either authors' career. The paper was accepted at the AER and that's the end of that.

   it actually seems like precious petra and her co-offender (you are probably one of them) are the real clueless clowns.

   5 years ago # QUOTE 7 Volod 0 Vlad !

4. Economist
   a0e4
   

   Updated version
   http://www.econ.ucsb.edu/~mrossin/Persson_RossinSlater_may2016_FINAL.pdf

   5 years ago # QUOTE 1 Volod 4 Vlad !

5. Economist
   f353
   

   Updated version
   http://www.econ.ucsb.edu/~mrossin/Persson_RossinSlater_may2016_FINAL.pdf

   Whoa! From the footnote:

   .. We are grateful to four anonymous referees and around 40 LRM aspie-virgins on EMJR.

   5 years ago # QUOTE 12 Volod 1 Vlad !

6. Economist
   d6f7
   

   So two citations for Class et al. So humbling!

   5 years ago # QUOTE 3 Volod 0 Vlad !

7. Economist
   55d5
   

   Updated version
   http://www.econ.ucsb.edu/~mrossin/Persson_RossinSlater_may2016_FINAL.pdf

   Whoa! From the footnote:

   .. We are grateful to four anonymous referees and around 40 LRM aspie-virgins on EMJR.

   Takes one to know one.

   5 years ago # QUOTE 1 Volod 0 Vlad !

8. Economist
   d6f7
   

   Foot note 7:
   "Related, an epidemiological study by Class et al. (2011) uses Swedish data... ...our results on birth outcomes lend credence to a causal interpretation of these earlier correlational findings...."

   5 years ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 0 Vlad !

9. Economist
   0a25
   

   Still deceptive, and clearly inappropriate to deal with this in a footnote. Did they alert the editor about this change?

   Now they reveal striking arrogance!

   5 years ago # QUOTE 21 Volod 0 Vlad !

10. Economist
    2b87
    

    Minimal changes to the lit review after acceptance doesn't change the fact that it wouldn't have been accepted if it had placed itself correctly in the literature in the first place. Bait and switch.

    5 years ago # QUOTE 20 Volod 0 Vlad !

11. Economist
    4e50
    

    perfect strategy: claim you are the first, and just add relevant litature during the production process.

    5 years ago # QUOTE 17 Volod 0 Vlad !

12. Economist
    55d5
    

    ^ and hide references to it in footnotes

    5 years ago # QUOTE 10 Volod 0 Vlad !

13. Economist
    62f9
    

    Disgusting.

    Updated version
    http://www.econ.ucsb.edu/~mrossin/Persson_RossinSlater_may2016_FINAL.pdf

    5 years ago # QUOTE 8 Volod 0 Vlad !

14. Economist
    f14d
    

    well, now they are like Cercei Lannister circa season 1 and everyone else here is like Ned Stark :(

    5 years ago # QUOTE 2 Volod 0 Vlad !

15. Economist
    f14d
    

    I mean "incest? what incest? cut his head off"

    5 years ago # QUOTE 1 Volod 0 Vlad !

16. Economist
    6f0b
    

    Mods, please sticky this thread for all of eternity.

    5 years ago # QUOTE 9 Volod 0 Vlad !

17. Economist
    ae68
    

    Foot note 7:
    "Related, an epidemiological study by Class et al. (2011) uses Swedish data... ...our results on birth outcomes lend credence to a causal interpretation of these earlier correlational findings...."

    EJMR strong.

    5 years ago # QUOTE 7 Volod 0 Vlad !

18. Economist
    c197
    

    This addition to the footnote is brutal. The editors really should be informed.

    5 years ago # QUOTE 13 Volod 0 Vlad !

19. Economist
    4619
    

    can't believe this is happening. they truly have no shame.

    5 years ago # QUOTE 9 Volod 0 Vlad !

20. Economist
    798b
    

    The editors, after being informed: "Thank you very much for your thorough informing, but we would not care even if they removed all other references, they are still HRM".

    5 years ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 0 Vlad !

Reply »