JL from Dartmouth? no kidding... I thought he's a deadwood already
New JF editorial team
-
This team is 100% white and 80% white male.
It would be deemed illegal board in western Europe and California.
Only 20% women,no asians or half asians or blacks?
Does not make sense.https://afajof.org/news/new-journal-of-finance-editorial-team-announced/
Indeed, this team is very rac8ist. What a W*H*I*T*E team!
-
Both Seru and Nagel did great job.
Bong and Xiang -- total failure.Great team. Seru and Nagel failed!
LOL. women in corp fin as chief-editor and joined by several quasi-deadwood. It's predictable that JF will become cor.rupt to the core.
People will miss Stefan Negal soon!
-
I think it is time that the JF had a female editor. But there are many more competent women. WJ would have been better. WJ is not corrupt while AS is (maybe this is a bit black and while but that's what I think). I also think ML from Drexel would have done a more fair job and is completely competent. AS, I just hope you will give LRMs like me a chance. This is not happening at NBER. I have to beg to attend and usually it doesn't work out. Be fair and give papers written by LRMs with potential a chance, even if we need a bit of more support since LRMs don't have the same chances to get feedback as HRMs do.
-
I think it is time that the JF had a female editor. But there are many more competent women. WJ would have been better. WJ is not corrupt while AS is (maybe this is a bit black and while but that's what I think). I also think ML from Drexel would have done a more fair job and is completely competent. AS, I just hope you will give LRMs like me a chance. This is not happening at NBER. I have to beg to attend and usually it doesn't work out. Be fair and give papers written by LRMs with potential a chance, even if we need a bit of more support since LRMs don't have the same chances to get feedback as HRMs do.
ML??????? Really???
-
I think it is time that the JF had a female editor. But there are many more competent women. WJ would have been better. WJ is not corrupt while AS is (maybe this is a bit black and while but that's what I think). I also think ML from Drexel would have done a more fair job and is completely competent. AS, I just hope you will give LRMs like me a chance. This is not happening at NBER. I have to beg to attend and usually it doesn't work out. Be fair and give papers written by LRMs with potential a chance, even if we need a bit of more support since LRMs don't have the same chances to get feedback as HRMs do.
ML??????? Really???
yes but AI or Blockchain would have been better.