Is there any mention of the movie reviews being most excellent? Someone, please bump those threads.
New York Times: EJMR is a hotbed of misogyny
-
You are firstly and foremost a low IQ underclass. Your gender is irrelevant.
That is why your analysis is useless and wrong.You can spin the above statement to take the attention from the reality that you are indeed the lower IQ underclass to making this about me being misogynist and sexist. It would be in your interest to spin it this way.
That is what this whole thing is all about. In a fake useless and crony field only such political tricks are at play.
Fat Broette economist here, and I am not ashamed of being fat. So, let's get that out of the way and suck it, losers.
Yes, there's a lot of misogyny here. When I post here I don't identify as female because of the usual trolls and I think quite a few Broettes do this as well. This is the downside of EJMR.
The anonymity of EJMR does give me the freedom to voice my opinion, which I feel I can't really do in the real world.
In my opinion, the profession has a bigger problem of HRM vs. LRM. Look how the HRMs had a show of force for Reinhart and Rogoff when they had their Excel scandal. According to them, only HRMs are able to come up with innovative ideas. Heaven forbid an LRM much less a female LRM challenges the status quo. We are shut out of the top journals because of this. f**king wankers.
I have an innovative research tool, but I am marginalized because I am *not* HRM and maybe I am marginalized because I am female, which is secondary.
Kirk, I told you to crack down on those AMTs and you did not listen. -
I wonder what will happen if the subject of the study is racial minority, especially Asians. She may also find something troubling there. The current mods are better in deleting trolls and racist posts but there was a time that mods are on board with Asian hating posters.
And not all posters are in the economics profession I suppose.I'm Asian and I troll on Asians the most lololol
-
You are firstly and foremost a low IQ underclass. Your gender is irrelevant.
That is why your analysis is useless and wrong.
You can spin the above statement to take the attention from the reality that you are indeed the lower IQ underclass to making this about me being misogynist and sexist. It would be in your interest to spin it this way.
That is what this whole thing is all about. In a fake useless and crony field only such political tricks are at play.Fat Broette economist here, and I am not ashamed of being fat. So, let's get that out of the way and suck it, losers.
Yes, there's a lot of misogyny here. When I post here I don't identify as female because of the usual trolls and I think quite a few Broettes do this as well. This is the downside of EJMR.
The anonymity of EJMR does give me the freedom to voice my opinion, which I feel I can't really do in the real world.
In my opinion, the profession has a bigger problem of HRM vs. LRM. Look how the HRMs had a show of force for Reinhart and Rogoff when they had their Excel scandal. According to them, only HRMs are able to come up with innovative ideas. Heaven forbid an LRM much less a female LRM challenges the status quo. We are shut out of the top journals because of this. f**king wankers.
I have an innovative research tool, but I am marginalized because I am *not* HRM and maybe I am marginalized because I am female, which is secondary.
Kirk, I told you to crack down on those AMTs and you did not listen.
AC6C, thank you for proving my point. And I rest my case.
-
Thank you.
I rest my case too.
You did exactly what was in your best interest.You are firstly and foremost a low IQ underclass. Your gender is irrelevant.
That is why your analysis is useless and wrong.
You can spin the above statement to take the attention from the reality that you are indeed the lower IQ underclass to making this about me being misogynist and sexist. It would be in your interest to spin it this way.
That is what this whole thing is all about. In a fake useless and crony field only such political tricks are at play.Fat Broette economist here, and I am not ashamed of being fat. So, let's get that out of the way and suck it, losers.
Yes, there's a lot of misogyny here. When I post here I don't identify as female because of the usual trolls and I think quite a few Broettes do this as well. This is the downside of EJMR.
The anonymity of EJMR does give me the freedom to voice my opinion, which I feel I can't really do in the real world.
In my opinion, the profession has a bigger problem of HRM vs. LRM. Look how the HRMs had a show of force for Reinhart and Rogoff when they had their Excel scandal. According to them, only HRMs are able to come up with innovative ideas. Heaven forbid an LRM much less a female LRM challenges the status quo. We are shut out of the top journals because of this. f**king wankers.
I have an innovative research tool, but I am marginalized because I am *not* HRM and maybe I am marginalized because I am female, which is secondary.
Kirk, I told you to crack down on those AMTs and you did not listen.
AC6C, thank you for proving my point. And I rest my case.
-
I'm talking about the most vicious posts about Asians, especially Asian men. I don't think a real Asian would find that funny at all.
I wonder what will happen if the subject of the study is racial minority, especially Asians. She may also find something troubling there. The current mods are better in deleting trolls and racist posts but there was a time that mods are on board with Asian hating posters.
And not all posters are in the economics profession I suppose.I'm Asian and I troll on Asians the most lololol
-
Thank you.
I rest my case too.
You did exactly what was in your best interest.You are firstly and foremost a low IQ underclass. Your gender is irrelevant.
That is why your analysis is useless and wrong.
You can spin the above statement to take the attention from the reality that you are indeed the lower IQ underclass to making this about me being misogynist and sexist. It would be in your interest to spin it this way.
That is what this whole thing is all about. In a fake useless and crony field only such political tricks are at play.Fat Broette economist here, and I am not ashamed of being fat. So, let's get that out of the way and suck it, losers.
Yes, there's a lot of misogyny here. When I post here I don't identify as female because of the usual trolls and I think quite a few Broettes do this as well. This is the downside of EJMR.
The anonymity of EJMR does give me the freedom to voice my opinion, which I feel I can't really do in the real world.
In my opinion, the profession has a bigger problem of HRM vs. LRM. Look how the HRMs had a show of force for Reinhart and Rogoff when they had their Excel scandal. According to them, only HRMs are able to come up with innovative ideas. Heaven forbid an LRM much less a female LRM challenges the status quo. We are shut out of the top journals because of this. f**king wankers.
I have an innovative research tool, but I am marginalized because I am *not* HRM and maybe I am marginalized because I am female, which is secondary.
Kirk, I told you to crack down on those AMTs and you did not listen.
AC6C, thank you for proving my point. And I rest my case.
Wow. Fastest case of HRM or HRM defender copying a LRM idea.
-
From article "Ms. Wu set up her computer to identify whether the subject of each post is a man or a woman. The simplest version involves looking for references to “she,” “her”, “herself,” or “he,” “him,” “his” or “himself.”"
Ms. Wu obvi forgot bro and broette.
Also, the paper does not use ML and is not pathbreaking. Everyone knows this place is a "cesspool". We don't need someone to scrape and summarize the data.
-
it looks like a fairly well written and thoughtful statistical analysis. though I would think the topic is probably more relevant to social psychology than it is to economics.
at the end of the day, this research just brings to mind the aphorism:
"Men like to test ideas, women like to test men" -
Speaking for myself, I talk s**t about people I don't like on EJMR. I don't do it all the time because there's only a handful of people I don't like, but whenever someone creates a thread about them, I will always take a s**t on them there.
In almost every case, the person is male. The only time I remember talking badly about a female is a person I met a conference once. She was extremely patronizing and rude. If she were male, there is no doubt I would have made an equally negative post about the person.
-
You think the facts matter boyo ?
Incompetence wants to look competent.
It is a fight for survival in a field everything is a big circle jerk and nothing else.Speaking for myself, I talk s**t about people I don't like on EJMR. I don't do it all the time because there's only a handful of people I don't like, but whenever someone creates a thread about them, I will always take a s**t on them there.
In almost every case, the person is male. The only time I remember talking badly about a female is a person I met a conference once. She was extremely patronizing and rude. If she were male, there is no doubt I would have made an equally negative post about the person. -
CONFESSION: I, a female, am the Tittie Touching 101 troll aside from my other trolling identities. I am the one posting the following 99% of the time and I crack down on interlopers because it is my meme.
Tittie Touching 101:.(•)•)ԅ(‾⌣‾ԅ)
I am making fun of the aspie virgins here.
-
This article truly documents the scope of oppressive patriarchy in the social sciences. The lived experiences of womyn scientists are categorically denied and discounted via occurence of microagression and microrape at the hands of male economists. The micro-pain caused to women's micro-careers when their micro-contributions are discounted by microheteonormative micro-sexism creates a profound sense of "micro-subjugation" and will only lead to micro rage.