Close

Complete Captcha

• 1 year - 72 posts - Latest - RSS
• Thread: 226 Goods vs 152 No Goods

1. Economist
   d7ef
   

   If you want to make an argument that women with high cognitive ability and low time preferences should voluntarily give up a lot in terms of freedom and standard of living because people without those things mess up their lives, tell me first what you're asking my male peers to give up. I'm not against the idea of collective responsibility to not screw over the left side of the bell curve, but that this always comes back to how women should be in the kitchen and not how men should make decisions that let them be married and supporting a family at 25 tells me that's not really what this is about.

   Me me me
   Leave the boys alone yog banshee, that’s all we are asking

   What boys? I'm raising mine in an intact home, so I don't think we're the issue here. You see a situation where lower-income men choose to not be involved in their kids' lives and you blame not just on women, but a group of women who overwhelmingly don't have children out of wedlock and have lower divorce rates than their parents.

   1 year ago # QUOTE 2 Volod 4 Vlad !

2. Economist
   5c4f
   

   If you want to make an argument that women with high cognitive ability and low time preferences should voluntarily give up a lot in terms of freedom and standard of living because people without those things mess up their lives, tell me first what you're asking my male peers to give up. I'm not against the idea of collective responsibility to not screw over the left side of the bell curve, but that this always comes back to how women should be in the kitchen and not how men should make decisions that let them be married and supporting a family at 25 tells me that's not really what this is about.

   You're talking to a bunch of redp1llers, don't bother.

   1 year ago # QUOTE 2 Volod 4 Vlad !

3. Economist
   c159
   

   Maybe men just are becoming mostly obsolete. Bureaucracy was arguably the greatest invention of the 20th century, being as it led to so many other great advancements, and women do better in a bureaucratic environment than men.

   1 year ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 5 Vlad !

4. Economist
   44ee
   

   I love the off-topic posts on this site because I get to see the p@thetic wh i te boys whine about how the world isn't fair to them. I hope you're all exactly as s@d as you sound.

   I’m brown, my gf is a brown goddess, and we both think western feminists like you are worse than t/r/a/s/h, you are downright ev!l.

   Why so angry? Feel left out from society? Sad that you're poor? Sad that the feminists are the ones winning?

   I love your rage. Bring me more.

   1 year ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 7 Vlad !

5. Economist
   44ee
   

   I love the off-topic posts on this site because I get to see the p@thetic wh i te boys whine about how the world isn't fair to them. I hope you're all exactly as s@d as you sound.

   I’m brown, my gf is a brown goddess, and we both think western feminists like you are worse than t/r/a/s/h, you are downright ev!l.

   Why so angry? Feel left out from society? Sad that you're poor? Sad that the feminists are the ones winning?
   I love your rage. Bring me more.

   Seriously, my d!ck is so hard right now. Get angrier for me.

   1 year ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 2 Vlad !

6. Economist
   a101
   

   If you want to make an argument that women with high cognitive ability and low time preferences should voluntarily give up a lot in terms of freedom and standard of living because people without those things mess up their lives, tell me first what you're asking my male peers to give up. I'm not against the idea of collective responsibility to not screw over the left side of the bell curve, but that this always comes back to how women should be in the kitchen and not how men should make decisions that let them be married and supporting a family at 25 tells me that's not really what this is about.

   I am not asking you or any other woman to give up anything. If you want it that way, that's totally fine. But I am happier with my non-feminist girlfriend. You can have the simps and be happy with them.

   1 year ago # QUOTE 2 Volod 0 Vlad !

7. Economist
   44ee
   

   I am not asking you or any other woman to give up anything. If you want it that way, that's totally fine. But I am happier with my non-feminist girlfriend. You can have the simps and be happy with them.

   The weak men want weak women. You all can have each other. Enjoy church this sunday and have a blessed day.

   1 year ago # QUOTE 1 Volod 6 Vlad !

8. Economist
   3849
   

   What is your ethnicity/religion? Do you have children?

   I love the off-topic posts on this site because I get to see the p@thetic wh i te boys whine about how the world isn't fair to them. I hope you're all exactly as s@d as you sound.

   I’m brown, my gf is a brown goddess, and we both think western feminists like you are worse than t/r/a/s/h, you are downright ev!l.

   Why so angry? Feel left out from society? Sad that you're poor? Sad that the feminists are the ones winning?
   I love your rage. Bring me more.

   1 year ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 0 Vlad !

9. Economist
   3849
   

   Oh, so you're Juice? I'm shocked.

   I am not asking you or any other woman to give up anything. If you want it that way, that's totally fine. But I am happier with my non-feminist girlfriend. You can have the simps and be happy with them.

   The weak men want weak women. You all can have each other. Enjoy church this sunday and have a blessed day.

   1 year ago # QUOTE 1 Volod 0 Vlad !

10. Economist
    c821
    

    If you want to make an argument that women with high cognitive ability and low time preferences should voluntarily give up a lot in terms of freedom and standard of living because people without those things mess up their lives, tell me first what you're asking my male peers to give up. I'm not against the idea of collective responsibility to not screw over the left side of the bell curve, but that this always comes back to how women should be in the kitchen and not how men should make decisions that let them be married and supporting a family at 25 tells me that's not really what this is about.

    Me me me
    Leave the boys alone yog banshee, that’s all we are asking

    What boys? I'm raising mine in an intact home, so I don't think we're the issue here. You see a situation where lower-income men choose to not be involved in their kids' lives and you blame not just on women, but a group of women who overwhelmingly don't have children out of wedlock and have lower divorce rates than their parents.

    Did you even read the article or the links in this thread? There are dozens of studies which show mistreatment of boys.

    “Stated differently, the current school environment or climate might be in general more attuned to feminine-typed personalities, which make it — in general — easier for girls to achieve better grades at school.”

    “ They cite a study demonstrating that single mothers report feeling more emotionally distant from their sons and engage in disciplinary action such as spanking more frequently with their sons. ”

    https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2000/05/the-war-against-boys/304659/

    Even if you don’t do it your son(hope to god) you cheered for policies and cultural changes that enable this. Did you cheer for Title IX kangaroo courts? WAP? Then you work for the dev!l.

    1 year ago # QUOTE 3 Volod 1 Vlad !

11. Economist
    c821
    

    Another point that has been made by Moynihan and Sowell earlier and David Shor recently:

    Elites before the 60s knew to keep their f/a/g/g/otry and bohemian values to themselves. Now they shove it down everybody’s throats, destroying religion or bourgeois values that hold the lower classes together.

    1 year ago # QUOTE 5 Volod 2 Vlad !

12. Economist
    4473
    

    I love the off-topic posts on this site because I get to see the p@thetic wh i te boys whine about how the world isn't fair to them. I hope you're all exactly as s@d as you sound.

    How do you know we’re white ?

    I’m indian

    1 year ago # QUOTE 2 Volod 2 Vlad !

13. Economist
    44ee
    

    I love the off-topic posts on this site because I get to see the p@thetic wh i te boys whine about how the world isn't fair to them. I hope you're all exactly as s@d as you sound.

    How do you know we’re white ?
    I’m indian

    you’re p@thetic, too. And your sadness also gets me erekt. The more left out and left behind you all feel, the more aroused I get. Please don’t let this thread die, I’ve never been so ar0used.

    1 year ago # QUOTE 1 Volod 2 Vlad !

14. Economist
    48c1
    

    The Greeks knew this: look at what happens to Ithaca when the men are gone for a long time.

    1 year ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 0 Vlad !

15. Economist
    0c56
    

    I love the off-topic posts on this site because I get to see the p@thetic wh i te boys whine about how the world isn't fair to them. I hope you're all exactly as s@d as you sound.

    What do you think a generation of young white boys will grow up to become with the current messaging? Do you really think they're just going to go away?

    1 year ago # QUOTE 2 Volod 0 Vlad !

16. Economist
    ee0f
    

    Lol, I guess male fragility is a thing after all

    I love the off-topic posts on this site because I get to see the p@thetic wh i te boys whine about how the world isn't fair to them. I hope you're all exactly as s@d as you sound.

    I’m brown, my gf is a brown goddess, and we both think western feminists like you are worse than t/r/a/s/h, you are downright ev!l.

    Why so angry? Feel left out from society? Sad that you're poor? Sad that the feminists are the ones winning?
    I love your rage. Bring me more.

    Seriously, my d!ck is so hard right now. Get angrier for me.

    1 year ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 0 Vlad !

17. Economist
    abfd
    

    Psst….who taught the boys to be volatile in the first place? Might want to start at the root of the problem before you start encouraging physical violence.

    It's actually just instinct and hormones. Traditions were put in place as safeguards. Other modern organizations, like amateur sports, boyscouts, music scences, etc all can often act as healthy outlets for guys who's bodies are pumping full of testosterone telling them to take risks, get in fights, find a mate, etc. Without that we see violence, substance, rpe, etc.

    Boys need direction and men who they respect and even idolize to steer them in the right direction.

    1 year ago # QUOTE 3 Volod 2 Vlad !

18. Economist
    44ee
    

    I love the off-topic posts on this site because I get to see the p@thetic wh i te boys whine about how the world isn't fair to them. I hope you're all exactly as s@d as you sound.

    What do you think a generation of young white boys will grow up to become with the current messaging? Do you really think they're just going to go away?

    say more about the boys becoming

    1 year ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 1 Vlad !

19. Economist
    543a
    

    This is actually pretty simple. The more mistreatment of boys, the more female dominance (number wise) at the universities, the worse income prospects and relationship prospects for young males the higher is the probability of riots, right wing fanatics gaining power etc. You push the men to misery they will respond. Not nicely though but with pure anger and violence. It's the flip of the feminist coin.

    1 year ago # QUOTE 4 Volod 1 Vlad !

20. Economist
    3765
    

    The Future Is Female

    There is no future dummy.

    1 year ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 0 Vlad !

Reply »