CL of course, but the rest? Which one made a name for himself/herself?
CL, HC, and VN at the tenured level.
JG at the untenured assoc level.
TR MM and DS at the asst level.
Are seven names enough?Has any European candidate actually managed to make a name for himself/herself after being hired by Chicago?
Seriously?
What are the names of those at your school who "made a name for themselves" before and/or after your school hired them? Please explain how much better known they are (or were) at the career stage that, say, HC and VN are at now.
CL of course, but the rest? Which one made a name for himself/herself?
CL, HC, and VN at the tenured level.
JG at the untenured assoc level.
TR MM and DS at the asst level.
Are seven names enough?Has any European candidate actually managed to make a name for himself/herself after being hired by Chicago?
Seven would be enough, but I had to look up who TR and MM were. A couple others are ok, but time will tell. The list is a stretch.
Look at schools in the top 50 and you’ll find people of similar vintage with similar impact. It’s not every person, but plenty of them exist.
CL, HC, and VN at the tenured level.
JG at the untenured assoc level.
TR MM and DS at the asst level.
Are seven names enough?Has any European candidate actually managed to make a name for himself/herself after being hired by Chicago?
Yes seriously. HC may have made tenure but he is still considered a RA for CL. Too bad. The rest, I have no idea what they do or who they are really.
I think MIT and Wharton did better at hiring.
Seriously?
What are the names of those at your school who "made a name for themselves" before and/or after your school hired them? Please explain how much better known they are (or were) at the career stage that, say, HC and VN are at now.CL of course, but the rest? Which one made a name for himself/herself?
CL, HC, and VN at the tenured level.
JG at the untenured assoc level.
TR MM and DS at the asst level.
Are seven names enough?Has any European candidate actually managed to make a name for himself/herself after being hired by Chicago?
Who would they need to interview for you to not call it shameful or corrupt? You throw out ad hominem attacks and offer no insight into the less corrupt system in your mind. Please share what that is. Randomized hiring?
Chicago flyout list
https://www.chicagobooth.edu/faculty/research-workshops/accounting-researchThe list of shame, corruption and the accounting phd disease. Period
Him/her and nobody else
Who would they need to interview for you to not call it shameful or corrupt? You throw out ad hominem attacks and offer no insight into the less corrupt system in your mind. Please share what that is. Randomized hiring?
Chicago flyout list
https://www.chicagobooth.edu/faculty/research-workshops/accounting-researchThe list of shame, corruption and the accounting phd disease. Period
Him/her and nobody else
Who would they need to interview for you to not call it shameful or corrupt? You throw out ad hominem attacks and offer no insight into the less corrupt system in your mind. Please share what that is. Randomized hiring?
Chicago flyout list
https://www.chicagobooth.edu/faculty/research-workshops/accounting-researchThe list of shame, corruption and the accounting phd disease. Period
Booth list looks quite diverse in relation to other places.
The interesting thing about Chicago's list is how diverse it is (in many ways).
5 to 10 years ago the list would be 95% white male coming from Stanford/mit/wharton/...
This is progress in my opinion. All candidates seem well-trained and talented. Also, the list not only has diversity of gender, but also of schools, ethnicity, training, ....
A list that is more representative of the field in Accounting (not only academia)
I actually think they invited all of the jmp stars this year (other than their own star). The only exception is KC from Wharton but maybe that is because they do not to fly out two from Wharton.
Chicago flyout list
https://www.chicagobooth.edu/faculty/research-workshops/accounting-researchThe list of shame, corruption and the accounting phd disease. Period
I actually think they invited all of the jmp stars this year (other than their own star). The only exception is KC from Wharton but maybe that is because they do not to fly out two from Wharton.
Chicago flyout list
https://www.chicagobooth.edu/faculty/research-workshops/accounting-researchThe list of shame, corruption and the accounting phd disease. Period
There are also *several* other candidates considered "stars" not in the list. DS (wisconsin), MP (miami), BC (Indiana), VP (usc), RF (a&m), candidates from emory, candidates from stanford, mit, yada yada yada...
You mean the RAs who spent so little time on their JMPs while working hard on coauthored papers with a big name?
I actually think they invited all of the jmp stars this year (other than their own star). The only exception is KC from Wharton but maybe that is because they do not to fly out two from Wharton.Chicago flyout list
https://www.chicagobooth.edu/faculty/research-workshops/accounting-researchThe list of shame, corruption and the accounting phd disease. Period
There are also *several* other candidates considered "stars" not in the list. DS (wisconsin), MP (miami), BC (Indiana), VP (usc), RF (a&m), candidates from emory, candidates from stanford, mit, yada yada yada...
DS is a decent researcher
You mean the RAs who spent so little time on their JMPs while working hard on coauthored papers with a big name?
There are also *several* other candidates considered "stars" not in the list. DS (wisconsin), MP (miami), BC (Indiana), VP (usc), RF (a&m), candidates from emory, candidates from stanford, mit, yada yada yada...
I actually think they invited all of the jmp stars this year (other than their own star). The only exception is KC from Wharton but maybe that is because they do not to fly out two from Wharton.
Chicago flyout list
https://www.chicagobooth.edu/faculty/research-workshops/accounting-researchThe list of shame, corruption and the accounting phd disease. Period
None of them has any publications.
DS is a decent researcher
You mean the RAs who spent so little time on their JMPs while working hard on coauthored papers with a big name?
There are also *several* other candidates considered "stars" not in the list. DS (wisconsin), MP (miami), BC (Indiana), VP (usc), RF (a&m), candidates from emory, candidates from stanford, mit, yada yada yada...
These are the stars of this year.
LB - Emory University - TAR
EB - University of Kentucky - TAR
JC - Emory University - JAE
MP - University of Miami - TAR
DS - University of Wisconsin-Madison - TAR
RF - TAMU - TAR
MZ - University of Toronto - TAR
I actually think they invited all of the jmp stars this year (other than their own star). The only exception is KC from Wharton but maybe that is because they do not to fly out two from Wharton.Chicago flyout list
https://www.chicagobooth.edu/faculty/research-workshops/accounting-researchThe list of shame, corruption and the accounting phd disease. Period
None of them has any publications.
Is there any way we can download or read the papers presented at Booth?