Big announcement coming at FARS meeting on Friday morning at plenary session. Stay tuned!... That they are shutting down JFR ?
Long overdue
Official Accounting JM Thread 2022
-
DS is a decent researcher
You mean the RAs who spent so little time on their JMPs while working hard on coauthored papers with a big name?
There are also *several* other candidates considered "stars" not in the list. DS (wisconsin), MP (miami), BC (Indiana), VP (usc), RF (a&m), candidates from emory, candidates from stanford, mit, yada yada yada...
These are the stars of this year.
LB - Emory University - TAR
EB - University of Kentucky - TAR
JC - Emory University - JAE
MP - University of Miami - TAR
DS - University of Wisconsin-Madison - TAR
RF - TAMU - TAR
MZ - University of Toronto - TARWhat is more interesting is that Chicago is ditching MIT despite the fact that MIT has three this year.
-
Loo//ser
I actually think they invited all of the jmp stars this year (other than their own star). The only exception is KC from Wharton but maybe that is because they do not to fly
They actually are not the best under no circumstances. There is nothing special about them and there is nothing special about Booth. It has been a while I haven't submitted any paper to JAR and I will never do. Meanwhile, I need say to all those who feel the market is not fair that it has never been but you will lose nothing if you don't get to booth and if you don't publish at JAR. There are many things in life that worth doing and don't let JAR put you down. Publish elsewhere, TAR, CAR, RAST and AJPT. Listen to music, get cooking classes, go for a walk or gardening as a therapy to cure the Jar addiction.
-
CL, HC, and VN at the tenured level.
JG at the untenured assoc level.
TR MM and DS at the asst level.
Are seven names enough?Has any European candidate actually managed to make a name for himself/herself after being hired by Chicago?
JG's diss is legit...other asst can never compare to him
-
These are the stars of this year.
LB - Emory University - TAR
EB - University of Kentucky - TAR
JC - Emory University - JAE
MP - University of Miami - TAR
DS - University of Wisconsin-Madison - TAR
RF - TAMU - TAR
MZ - University of Toronto - TARWho have ever published a solo authored paper to and A journal while still a PhD student? Of course you need coauthors. The important thing is you are not just an RA. If you had the idea and worked on the paper than do not f..king listen to g/a/r/b/a/g/e/ lo/se/rs like this one below.
Coauthors: Knechel, Kadous, Carter, Leone, Donelson… yep looks like these ones contributed
-
These are the stars of this year.
LB - Emory University - TAR
EB - University of Kentucky - TAR
JC - Emory University - JAE
MP - University of Miami - TAR
DS - University of Wisconsin-Madison - TAR
RF - TAMU - TAR
MZ - University of Toronto - TAR
Who have ever published a solo authored paper to and A journal while still a PhD student? Of course you need coauthors. The important thing is you are not just an RA. If you had the idea and worked on the paper than do not f..king listen to g/a/r/b/a/g/e/ lo/se/rs like this one below.
Coauthors: Knechel, Kadous, Carter, Leone, Donelson… yep looks like these ones contributedWhen candidates are on the job market, faculty can easily get a sense of which students made substantial contributions to a paper. Can they discuss the paper intelligently? Can they describe the fundamental motivation/contribution rather than just the analyses?
And in most schools there isn't that much weight put on these publications anyway. The papers co-authored with your advisor in the PhD program are discounted (to some extent) in tenure letters, so they're also discounted in the hiring process. One of the biggest positives of a PhD student with publications is that they've at least been through the review process, seen review reports, worked on response memos, etc., so it's not going to be an entirely foreign concept to them once they transition to faculty.
-
These are the stars of this year.
LB - Emory University - TAR
EB - University of Kentucky - TAR
JC - Emory University - JAE
MP - University of Miami - TAR
DS - University of Wisconsin-Madison - TAR
RF - TAMU - TAR
MZ - University of Toronto - TAR
Who have ever published a solo authored paper to and A journal while still a PhD student? Of course you need coauthors. The important thing is you are not just an RA. If you had the idea and worked on the paper than do not f..king listen to g/a/r/b/a/g/e/ lo/se/rs like this one below.
Coauthors: Knechel, Kadous, Carter, Leone, Donelson… yep looks like these ones contributeda few candidates have a solo authored A journal (JAE, JAR, TAR) R&R though they don't have any pub.
-
These are the stars of this year.
LB - Emory University - TAR
EB - University of Kentucky - TAR
JC - Emory University - JAE
MP - University of Miami - TAR
DS - University of Wisconsin-Madison - TAR
RF - TAMU - TAR
MZ - University of Toronto - TAR
Who have ever published a solo authored paper to and A journal while still a PhD student? Of course you need coauthors. The important thing is you are not just an RA. If you had the idea and worked on the paper than do not f..king listen to g/a/r/b/a/g/e/ lo/se/rs like this one below.
Coauthors: Knechel, Kadous, Carter, Leone, Donelson… yep looks like these ones contributedWhen candidates are on the job market, faculty can easily get a sense of which students made substantial contributions to a paper. Can they discuss the paper intelligently? Can they describe the fundamental motivation/contribution rather than just the analyses?
And in most schools there isn't that much weight put on these publications anyway. The papers co-authored with your advisor in the PhD program are discounted (to some extent) in tenure letters, so they're also discounted in the hiring process. One of the biggest positives of a PhD student with publications is that they've at least been through the review process, seen review reports, worked on response memos, etc., so it's not going to be an entirely foreign concept to them once they transition to faculty.If I have to agree with you, how do you decide about a certain candidate if you don't interview? I guess you would say you don't know, there is n o way to know. Then, why do you pick those from "top" schools or even glorious RAs?
I have a real example. Some famous professor is invited to a very "prestigious" school to present a paper about smth very trendy in accounting but with weak results, no contribution and very small data sample. Meanwhile, a jmc is conducting a very similar research with a very large data sample have different results but who doesn't get a job interview at the same university which invited the famous professor to represent his garbage paper.
-
These are the stars of this year.
LB - Emory University - TAR
EB - University of Kentucky - TAR
JC - Emory University - JAE
MP - University of Miami - TAR
DS - University of Wisconsin-Madison - TAR
RF - TAMU - TAR
MZ - University of Toronto - TAR
Who have ever published a solo authored paper to and A journal while still a PhD student? Of course you need coauthors. The important thing is you are not just an RA. If you had the idea and worked on the paper than do not f..king listen to g/a/r/b/a/g/e/ lo/se/rs like this one below.
Coauthors: Knechel, Kadous, Carter, Leone, Donelson… yep looks like these ones contributedWhen candidates are on the job market, faculty can easily get a sense of which students made substantial contributions to a paper. Can they discuss the paper intelligently? Can they describe the fundamental motivation/contribution rather than just the analyses?
And in most schools there isn't that much weight put on these publications anyway. The papers co-authored with your advisor in the PhD program are discounted (to some extent) in tenure letters, so they're also discounted in the hiring process. One of the biggest positives of a PhD student with publications is that they've at least been through the review process, seen review reports, worked on response memos, etc., so it's not going to be an entirely foreign concept to them once they transition to faculty.If I have to agree with you, how do you decide about a certain candidate if you don't interview? I guess you would say you don't know, there is n o way to know. Then, why do you pick those from "top" schools or even glorious RAs?
I have a real example. Some famous professor is invited to a very "prestigious" school to present a paper about smth very trendy in accounting but with weak results, no contribution and very small data sample. Meanwhile, a jmc is conducting a very similar research with a very large data sample have different results but who doesn't get a job interview at the same university which invited the famous professor to represent his garbage paper.It's not perfect, and we obviously don't talk to everyone. But things like Miami (for all its flaws) and January section meetings help. We tend to catch JMCs in the hallways just to grab a tea/coffee and chat for ten or fifteen minutes. It doesn't take long to figure out whether people can talk intelligently about their own work (in which case we'd invite them for a more formal interview). With a couple faculty attending Miami, or other midyear meetings, we can get pretty good coverage and talk to a lot of candidates and figure out who should move forward in the process.
-
Letters generally say the role the student played in the paper. At least a couple of these were the student’s idea. That type of thing is often easy to document (e.g. it goes back to a PhD seminar paper).
These are the stars of this year.
LB - Emory University - TAR
EB - University of Kentucky - TAR
JC - Emory University - JAE
MP - University of Miami - TAR
DS - University of Wisconsin-Madison - TAR
RF - TAMU - TAR
MZ - University of Toronto - TAR
Who have ever published a solo authored paper to and A journal while still a PhD student? Of course you need coauthors. The important thing is you are not just an RA. If you had the idea and worked on the paper than do not f..king listen to g/a/r/b/a/g/e/ lo/se/rs like this one below.
Coauthors: Knechel, Kadous, Carter, Leone, Donelson… yep looks like these ones contributed -
Every candidate writes "this is based on my second year summer paper...blah blah blah." So there is no signaling value. Overall, I think someone is trying very hard to promote some of the kids here. In reality, I would choose MIT, Stanford, Wharton and Chicago kids over these so-called stars ten out of ten times. The gap in quality between their publications and road papers is astounding. We had a couple of these out for a visit.
Letters generally say the role the student played in the paper. At least a couple of these were the student’s idea. That type of thing is often easy to document (e.g. it goes back to a PhD seminar paper).