Grow up please.stop being a holes here.
This x 100. Anonymity has allowed too many of you to become unprofessional and uncivil.
Official Accounting JM Thread 2022
-
Grow up please.stop being a holes here.
This x 100. Anonymity has allowed too many of you to become unprofessional and uncivil.
Perhaps a better way to say it - it has revealed that some of the “niceness” we see at conferences is totally fake. It has revealed how unprofessional some of us are.
-
Indeed. Many people in our field would gladly see others fail. It’s unfortunate but sadly true.
Grow up please.stop being a holes here.
This x 100. Anonymity has allowed too many of you to become unprofessional and uncivil.
Perhaps a better way to say it - it has revealed that some of the “niceness” we see at conferences is totally fake. It has revealed how unprofessional some of us are.
-
Indeed. Many people in our field would gladly see others fail. It’s unfortunate but sadly true.
Grow up please.stop being a holes here.
This x 100. Anonymity has allowed too many of you to become unprofessional and uncivil.
Perhaps a better way to say it - it has revealed that some of the “niceness” we see at conferences is totally fake. It has revealed how unprofessional some of us are.
It's baked into the incentives. Publish or perish. Darwin strong.
-
Grow up please.stop being a holes here.
This x 100. Anonymity has allowed too many of you to become unprofessional and uncivil.
Perhaps a better way to say it - it has revealed that some of the “niceness” we see at conferences is totally fake. It has revealed how unprofessional some of us are.
None of the mean sexists in thus thread are getting many conference invites.
-
Grow up please.stop being a holes here.
This x 100. Anonymity has allowed too many of you to become unprofessional and uncivil.
If we didnt have Anonymity no problem would have been made public, because, this system is based in revenge to the point you dont even dare to appeal the rejection.
-
Grow up please.stop being a holes here.
This x 100. Anonymity has allowed too many of you to become unprofessional and uncivil.
If we didnt have Anonymity no problem would have been made public, because, this system is based in revenge to the point you dont even dare to appeal the rejection.
We are in a much worse situation comparing even to a criminal who has the right to appeal a decision! What a science!?
-
This statement isn't even coherent. Not surprised you don't get published.
We are in a much worse situation comparing even to a criminal who has the right to appeal a decision! What a science!?
Read below you fu/ki/ng b!t/ch - mo/ron
Thanks to RK we have the most transparent and professional organization we have wanted for a long time. He picks shit tells us to go and fuk yaself because there is nothing he can do.
July 2021
The review, as outlined above, is an overview of the typical review process. The senior editor may, in some circumstances, vary this process at his or her discretion.
TAR POLICIES
Appeals of Rejected Manuscripts
TAR’s overall policy is that the Editor’s editorial decision on a paper is final. The only exceptions are when the editorial decision was based on a factual mistake or there was a breach in the review process. Importantly, disagreements in judgment are not grounds for reinstating a previously rejected a paper. Thus, appeals should be rare, and successful appeals should be quite rare. -
This statement isn't even coherent. Not surprised you don't get published.
We are in a much worse situation comparing even to a criminal who has the right to appeal a decision! What a science!?
Read below you fu/ki/ng b!t/ch - mo/ron
Thanks to RK we have the most transparent and professional organization we have wanted for a long time. He picks shit tells us to go and fuk yaself because there is nothing he can do.
July 2021
The review, as outlined above, is an overview of the typical review process. The senior editor may, in some circumstances, vary this process at his or her discretion.
TAR POLICIES
Appeals of Rejected Manuscripts
TAR’s overall policy is that the Editor’s editorial decision on a paper is final. The only exceptions are when the editorial decision was based on a factual mistake or there was a breach in the review process. Importantly, disagreements in judgment are not grounds for reinstating a previously rejected a paper. Thus, appeals should be rare, and successful appeals should be quite rare.So a criminal has more rights than an accounting researcher! Who the mor/on decided this?