Who got the Michigan offer? Anyone knows?
Official Accounting JM Thread 2022
-
EJMR grievance rants get you nowhere. Maybe try the AAA Publications Committee with your rants.
Committee on Publications
The Committee on Publications shall study and report to the President and Executive Committee on all matters of concern in the field of publications. It shall also provide a slate of candidates to the Executive Committee for its guidance when appointing the Managing Editors of T he Accounting Review , Accounting Horizons , and Issues in Accounting Education . The committee shall consist of seven members including the Vice President-Publications, who will serve as chair. The committee members shall have staggered three-year terms, with two members being appointed each year.
https://aaahq.org/About/Governance/bylaws/bylaws-1999#XI
TAR policy
https://meridian.allenpress.com/DocumentLibrary/AAAN/TAR_Editorial_Policy.pdfReally?
This is an act of utterly disrespect towards scientists. Fuk you, your rules and tenure.
-
EJMR grievance rants get you nowhere. Maybe try the AAA Publications Committee with your rants.
Committee on Publications
The Committee on Publications shall study and report to the President and Executive Committee on all matters of concern in the field of publications. It shall also provide a slate of candidates to the Executive Committee for its guidance when appointing the Managing Editors of T he Accounting Review , Accounting Horizons , and Issues in Accounting Education . The committee shall consist of seven members including the Vice President-Publications, who will serve as chair. The committee members shall have staggered three-year terms, with two members being appointed each year.
https://aaahq.org/About/Governance/bylaws/bylaws-1999#XITAR policy
https://meridian.allenpress.com/DocumentLibrary/AAAN/TAR_Editorial_Policy.pdfReally?
This is an act of utterly disrespect towards scientists. Fuk you, your rules and tenure.
Who has established this "no appeal" rule, RK or the Committee on Publications?
-
This editorial policy is a bad mood joke. Tar referees are on average quite bad. Rejections often come without grounds. FWIW, JAR and JAE are not much better. JAE is totally corrupt.
This statement isn't even coherent. Not surprised you don't get published.
We are in a much worse situation comparing even to a criminal who has the right to appeal a decision! What a science!?
Read below you fu/ki/ng b!t/ch - mo/ron
Thanks to RK we have the most transparent and professional organization we have wanted for a long time. He picks shit tells us to go and fuk yaself because there is nothing he can do.
July 2021
The review, as outlined above, is an overview of the typical review process. The senior editor may, in some circumstances, vary this process at his or her discretion.
TAR POLICIES
Appeals of Rejected Manuscripts
TAR’s overall policy is that the Editor’s editorial decision on a paper is final. The only exceptions are when the editorial decision was based on a factual mistake or there was a breach in the review process. Importantly, disagreements in judgment are not grounds for reinstating a previously rejected a paper. Thus, appeals should be rare, and successful appeals should be quite rare. -
JAE. In one case I saw before, the editor was invited to one of the authors' schools during the review process. After acceptance and the identity of the reviewer was revealed, the reviewer was invited to one of the authors' schools. Guess who the editor was?
This editorial policy is a bad mood joke. Tar referees are on average quite bad. Rejections often come without grounds. FWIW, JAR and JAE are not much better. JAE is totally corrupt.
This statement isn't even coherent. Not surprised you don't get published.
We are in a much worse situation comparing even to a criminal who has the right to appeal a decision! What a science!?
Read below you fu/ki/ng b!t/ch - mo/ron
Thanks to RK we have the most transparent and professional organization we have wanted for a long time. He picks shit tells us to go and fuk yaself because there is nothing he can do.
July 2021
The review, as outlined above, is an overview of the typical review process. The senior editor may, in some circumstances, vary this process at his or her discretion.
TAR POLICIES
Appeals of Rejected Manuscripts
TAR’s overall policy is that the Editor’s editorial decision on a paper is final. The only exceptions are when the editorial decision was based on a factual mistake or there was a breach in the review process. Importantly, disagreements in judgment are not grounds for reinstating a previously rejected a paper. Thus, appeals should be rare, and successful appeals should be quite rare.