Yes apparently Indiana Finance made her an offer and she accepted. Money talks I guess.VF to Indiana?
As well as some of her colleagues......
Which colleagues?
good people are leaving Minnesota, confirmed by insiders
GMU is a crazy place. They don’t want their best candidates, because current faculty members donot want to lose their power to strong candidates with good research records. They always try to hire someone who is expected to fail tenure.I'm slowly realizing that I'm at a place like this - as more papers hit and the seniors realize that I'll soon have a better research record than them, I'm getting frozen out more. Wish I hadn't taken so long to realize this, but I guess it's time to try the seasoned market...
UIUC - Northeastern - BYU - Booth - UVA Darden are all same bad for rookies. Stay away if you can!
You mean Northwestern?
GMU is a crazy place. They don’t want their best candidates, because current faculty members donot want to lose their power to strong candidates with good research records. They always try to hire someone who is expected to fail tenure.
wtf is going on with the chinabros at cuhk shenzen this year
What a shame. They looked to be on the up in recent years and be competitive with other area schools, but seem to be wasting it all away. Too much deadwood at the top and hiring underqualified candidates = no one will take you seriously (were they ever considered seriously?) guess it’s best to avoid places like these
GMU is a crazy place. They don’t want their best candidates, because current faculty members donot want to lose their power to strong candidates with good research records. They always try to hire someone who is expected to fail tenure.wtf is going on with the chinabros at cuhk shenzen this year
What a shame. They looked to be on the up in recent years and be competitive with other area schools, but seem to be wasting it all away. Too much deadwood at the top and hiring underqualified candidates = no one will take you seriously (were they ever considered seriously?) guess it’s best to avoid places like these
Always a shame to see things like this happen at schols that *should* be on the up by virtue of location. A generation ago it'd be unfathomable that a candidate would pick a good state school (say UIUC) over somewhere like GMU. Now it's totally plausible, because the candidate and/or their spouse could well have a strong locational preference for DC over the middle of nowhere. But locational preference only offsets so much toxicity...
Leave as soon as you can. Saw the same happen to a colleague
Get used to it... many accounting seniors are deeply insecure.
GMU is a crazy place. They don’t want their best candidates, because current faculty members donot want to lose their power to strong candidates with good research records. They always try to hire someone who is expected to fail tenure.I'm slowly realizing that I'm at a place like this - as more papers hit and the seniors realize that I'll soon have a better research record than them, I'm getting frozen out more. Wish I hadn't taken so long to realize this, but I guess it's time to try the seasoned market...
You summed things up nicely for the rage robot, but are off base on this one. Work experience doesn't matter nearly as much as it should at a literal majority of schools out there (and particularly, higher-tier research schools). I mean, look at how many BYU grads and international candidates get hired every year with at MOST one single two-month internship. People wonder why the outside world still views academia as the ivory tower, but things like this are part of the issue.
Sure, I'll explain it.
Fourth, people like CM have actually worked and believe it or not, the people who hire (yah, you know I highly doubt you have any work experience) accounting graduates actually care about that.
Agree. For STEM majors, professors can do well without work experience. But come on, in business school, can someone without real business work experience teach students how to do well in the real business world? If this is acceptable, then doctors can be trained by someone without real experience at treating patients!
You summed things up nicely for the rage robot, but are off base on this one. Work experience doesn't matter nearly as much as it should at a literal majority of schools out there (and particularly, higher-tier research schools). I mean, look at how many BYU grads and international candidates get hired every year with at MOST one single two-month internship. People wonder why the outside world still views academia as the ivory tower, but things like this are part of the issue.
Sure, I'll explain it.
Fourth, people like CM have actually worked and believe it or not, the people who hire (yah, you know I highly doubt you have any work experience) accounting graduates actually care about that.
Agree. For STEM majors, professors can do well without work experience. But come on, in business school, can someone without real business work experience teach students how to do well in the real business world? If this is acceptable, then doctors can be trained by someone without real experience at treating patients!
You summed things up nicely for the rage robot, but are off base on this one. Work experience doesn't matter nearly as much as it should at a literal majority of schools out there (and particularly, higher-tier research schools). I mean, look at how many BYU grads and international candidates get hired every year with at MOST one single two-month internship. People wonder why the outside world still views academia as the ivory tower, but things like this are part of the issue.
Sure, I'll explain it.
Fourth, people like CM have actually worked and believe it or not, the people who hire (yah, you know I highly doubt you have any work experience) accounting graduates actually care about that.
This is also a very narrow view, because the 'business world' is very diverse - just think of how many different careers there are in finance or economics. Practitioners can tell nice stories, but that stuff hardly generalizes. And university teaching is not about running a particular business. That said, it is a good idea to have some practitioners do some of the teaching (as is done in many schools).
Agree. For STEM majors, professors can do well without work experience. But come on, in business school, can someone without real business work experience teach students how to do well in the real business world? If this is acceptable, then doctors can be trained by someone without real experience at treating patients!
You summed things up nicely for the rage robot, but are off base on this one. Work experience doesn't matter nearly as much as it should at a literal majority of schools out there (and particularly, higher-tier research schools). I mean, look at how many BYU grads and international candidates get hired every year with at MOST one single two-month internship. People wonder why the outside world still views academia as the ivory tower, but things like this are part of the issue.
Sure, I'll explain it.
Fourth, people like CM have actually worked and believe it or not, the people who hire (yah, you know I highly doubt you have any work experience) accounting graduates actually care about that.
yes, that’s why you are at a teaching school. Check Eugene Fama’s CV. No such experience as you described. noble prize winner, daaaah…