Agree. If you interview at AAA you aren’t real PhD. Waste of money and schools should fail people on comps that have no hope at top tier research schools. That way the get masters degree and become lecturers at $90k a year teaching 3/3 load.
You give a PhD to a person that can’t do research, then you have lazy overpaid person that acts like a diva with nothing to back it up. It’s a problem.
LRMs are killing the profession. They don’t know what good research is. What’s worse is they are zealous thinking they are worthy of top 3 publications and their simple minds assume that rejections are because of clubs. Face it. Your too stupid to publish in top journals.
Agree. If you interview at AAA you aren’t real PhD. Waste of money and schools should fail people on comps that have no hope at top tier research schools. That way the get masters degree and become lecturers at $90k a year teaching 3/3 load.
You give a PhD to a person that can’t do research, then you have lazy overpaid person that acts like a diva with nothing to back it up. It’s a problem.
You’re not your. Maybe you are low iq.
LRMs are killing the profession. They don’t know what good research is. What’s worse is they are zealous thinking they are worthy of top 3 publications and their simple minds assume that rejections are because of clubs. Face it. Your too stupid to publish in top journals.
Agree. If you interview at AAA you aren’t real PhD. Waste of money and schools should fail people on comps that have no hope at top tier research schools. That way the get masters degree and become lecturers at $90k a year teaching 3/3 load.
You give a PhD to a person that can’t do research, then you have lazy overpaid person that acts like a diva with nothing to back it up. It’s a problem.
Grammar police. Get a life LRM. Enjoy your lecturer pay.
You’re not your. Maybe you are low iq.
LRMs are killing the profession. They don’t know what good research is. What’s worse is they are zealous thinking they are worthy of top 3 publications and their simple minds assume that rejections are because of clubs. Face it. Your too stupid to publish in top journals.
Agree. If you interview at AAA you aren’t real PhD. Waste of money and schools should fail people on comps that have no hope at top tier research schools. That way the get masters degree and become lecturers at $90k a year teaching 3/3 load.
You give a PhD to a person that can’t do research, then you have lazy overpaid person that acts like a diva with nothing to back it up. It’s a problem.
I’m at a teaching school and have 20 pubs. I am a PhD and am making a big difference. Tired of arrogant f#cos like you that think research in JAR.JAE matters. Those journals are bs and make no impact on the real world. You elites are the frauds wasting resources.
Agree. If you interview at AAA you aren’t real PhD. Waste of money and schools should fail people on comps that have no hope at top tier research schools. That way the get masters degree and become lecturers at $90k a year teaching 3/3 load.
You give a PhD to a person that can’t do research, then you have lazy overpaid person that acts like a diva with nothing to back it up. It’s a problem.
This is what they want. Pit LRMs and HRMs against each other in order to take over the journals and profession. They are a problem.
I’m at a teaching school and have 20 pubs. I am a PhD and am making a big difference. Tired of arrogant f#cos like you that think research in JAR.JAE matters. Those journals are bs and make no impact on the real world. You elites are the frauds wasting resources.
Agree. If you interview at AAA you aren’t real PhD. Waste of money and schools should fail people on comps that have no hope at top tier research schools. That way the get masters degree and become lecturers at $90k a year teaching 3/3 load.
You give a PhD to a person that can’t do research, then you have lazy overpaid person that acts like a diva with nothing to back it up. It’s a problem.
Who are they?
This is what they want. Pit LRMs and HRMs against each other in order to take over the journals and profession. They are a problem.
I’m at a teaching school and have 20 pubs. I am a PhD and am making a big difference. Tired of arrogant f#cos like you that think research in JAR.JAE matters. Those journals are bs and make no impact on the real world. You elites are the frauds wasting resources.
Agree. If you interview at AAA you aren’t real PhD. Waste of money and schools should fail people on comps that have no hope at top tier research schools. That way the get masters degree and become lecturers at $90k a year teaching 3/3 load.
You give a PhD to a person that can’t do research, then you have lazy overpaid person that acts like a diva with nothing to back it up. It’s a problem.
They are they.
Who are they?
This is what they want. Pit LRMs and HRMs against each other in order to take over the journals and profession. They are a problem.
I’m at a teaching school and have 20 pubs. I am a PhD and am making a big difference. Tired of arrogant f#cos like you that think research in JAR.JAE matters. Those journals are bs and make no impact on the real world. You elites are the frauds wasting resources.
Agree. If you interview at AAA you aren’t real PhD. Waste of money and schools should fail people on comps that have no hope at top tier research schools. That way the get masters degree and become lecturers at $90k a year teaching 3/3 load.
You give a PhD to a person that can’t do research, then you have lazy overpaid person that acts like a diva with nothing to back it up. It’s a problem.
Horizons is DW’s psychiatrist. Every time his research is rejected at top journals he runs there to feed his narcissistic tendencies. That’s why it has equal weighting in his “rankings!”
What’s Horizons? A journal based on fantasy?
BYU. Look what they did to Horizons editorial board.
LRMs are killing the profession. They don’t know what good research is. What’s worse is they are zealous thinking they are worthy of top 3 publications and their simple minds assume that rejections are because of clubs. Face it. Your too stupid to publish in top journals.
Agree. If you interview at AAA you aren’t real PhD. Waste of money and schools should fail people on comps that have no hope at top tier research schools. That way the get masters degree and become lecturers at $90k a year teaching 3/3 load.
You give a PhD to a person that can’t do research, then you have lazy overpaid person that acts like a diva with nothing to back it up. It’s a problem.
You must be publishing your work in AER, ECTA, JPE, QJE?
Let's face it. EJMR ppl think TAR, JAE, JAR papers are toilet papers. They call us accountant, not researcher.
I mean, they have editors and EB members who don’t publish at all, and also don’t really have a pulse on practitioner issues either. I’ll be interested to see how this experiment plays out. I doubt practitioners will find anything useful in there. Impact factor to toilet.
Horizons is DW’s psychiatrist. Every time his research is rejected at top journals he runs there to feed his narcissistic tendencies. That’s why it has equal weighting in his “rankings!”
What’s Horizons? A journal based on fantasy?
BYU. Look what they did to Horizons editorial board.
But at least they look different from each other, despite their qualifications. You don’t make someone qualified by just giving them responsibility.
I mean, they have editors and EB members who don’t publish at all, and also don’t really have a pulse on practitioner issues either. I’ll be interested to see how this experiment plays out. I doubt practitioners will find anything useful in there. Impact factor to toilet.
Horizons is DW’s psychiatrist. Every time his research is rejected at top journals he runs there to feed his narcissistic tendencies. That’s why it has equal weighting in his “rankings!”
What’s Horizons? A journal based on fantasy?
BYU. Look what they did to Horizons editorial board.