q6
What’s Horizons? A journal based on fantasy?
BYU. Look what they did to Horizons editorial board.
two horizons will get you tenure at my 2-2 school that pays 200k.
Being able to do research is the difference between 200k and 400k. It’s up to you if that’s worth it.
Research doesn’t matter folks.
Research? What is that? Is that everything that is new and have impact or smth that should be published at TAR, JAR, JAE or CAR? If so fuk research, especially those accepted by trash, MC-UGA and alike.
Your ideas are intriguing to me, and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.
Being able to do research is the difference between 200k and 400k. It’s up to you if that’s worth it.Research doesn’t matter folks.
Research? What is that? Is that everything that is new and have impact or smth that should be published at TAR, JAR, JAE or CAR? If so fuk research, especially those accepted by trash, MC-UGA and alike.
Your ideas are intriguing to me, and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.
Being able to do research is the difference between 200k and 400k. It’s up to you if that’s worth it.Research doesn’t matter folks.
Research? What is that? Is that everything that is new and have impact or smth that should be published at TAR, JAR, JAE or CAR? If so fuk research, especially those accepted by trash, MC-UGA and alike.
U are.
Very few who can do research are making $400k. They exist, but those numbers are tiny. Around $300k is a more realistic number.
If someone’s making $200k/year for 20hrs of work per week at an LRM school vs $300k for 40 hours a week at an HRM school, the LRM people don’t look so stupid.
We all have different utility functions.
Being able to do research is the difference between 200k and 400k. It’s up to you if that’s worth it.
Research doesn’t matter folks.
Very few who can do research are making $400k. They exist, but those numbers are tiny. Around $300k is a more realistic number.
If someone’s making $200k/year for 20hrs of work per week at an LRM school vs $300k for 40 hours a week at an HRM school, the LRM people don’t look so stupid.
We all have different utility functions.Being able to do research is the difference between 200k and 400k. It’s up to you if that’s worth it.
Research doesn’t matter folks.
Those numbers are tiny and do not represent even 1% of the people and they are the ones who destroyed this profession, for good. Secondly, I am wondering: Why are you talking 1% salary numbers and not unemployment, no-shortage, no-fairness, corruption, no-tenure, no-publication, racism and son on. If I knew this 6 years ago I wouldn't enroll in a phd program, instead I would go for CPA now and this is what I suggest to everyone. Investing 6 years in ac accounting phd is a huge mistake. I made it to the industry with my CPA and threw away my phd investment and freed myself from the most corrupt group I have ever had to deal with.
LRMs are killing the profession. They don’t know what good research is. What’s worse is they are zealous thinking they are worthy of top 3 publications and their simple minds assume that rejections are because of clubs. Face it. Your too stupid to publish in top journals.Agree. If you interview at AAA you aren’t real PhD. Waste of money and schools should fail people on comps that have no hope at top tier research schools. That way the get masters degree and become lecturers at $90k a year teaching 3/3 load.
You give a PhD to a person that can’t do research, then you have lazy overpaid person that acts like a diva with nothing to back it up. It’s a problem.
You must be publishing your work in AER, ECTA, JPE, QJE?
Let's face it. EJMR ppl think TAR, JAE, JAR papers are toilet papers. They call us accountant, not researcher.
Super lemons, lazy bss who come from HRM and the glorious RAs have destroyed this profession. RT Booth?
There is a different thread for discussing whether a PhD in Accounting is still worth it. Please, let's stay on topic here.
Is it true that PP from Berkeley plagiarized his Title IX testimony?
The tally:
- plagiarism & self-plagiarism
- sleeping with students
- Title IX (reprimanded quietly)
- manipulative behavior against other profs and blocking of tenure candidates
What did we miss?
I know a lot of people making 400k. Don’t know anyone who couldn’t get a job, ever. I guess they exist, but I haven’t met them.
And jobs keep getting posted by the day while you guys keep posting “no jobs”…so when will you get realistic?
Very few who can do research are making $400k. They exist, but those numbers are tiny. Around $300k is a more realistic number.
If someone’s making $200k/year for 20hrs of work per week at an LRM school vs $300k for 40 hours a week at an HRM school, the LRM people don’t look so stupid.
We all have different utility functions.Being able to do research is the difference between 200k and 400k. It’s up to you if that’s worth it.
Research doesn’t matter folks.
Those numbers are tiny and do not represent even 1% of the people and they are the ones who destroyed this profession, for good. Secondly, I am wondering: Why are you talking 1% salary numbers and not unemployment, no-shortage, no-fairness, corruption, no-tenure, no-publication, racism and son on. If I knew this 6 years ago I wouldn't enroll in a phd program, instead I would go for CPA now and this is what I suggest to everyone. Investing 6 years in ac accounting phd is a huge mistake. I made it to the industry with my CPA and threw away my phd investment and freed myself from the most corrupt group I have ever had to deal with.
I know a lot of people making 400k. Don’t know anyone who couldn’t get a job, ever. I guess they exist, but I haven’t met them.
And jobs keep getting posted by the day while you guys keep posting “no jobs”…so when will you get realistic?
Full professors at top 30 make that. GTF0, you tro11
Exactly. There are a lot more full professors at the top 30 than people who have failed the job market all time. But you guys are obsessed with one outcome while you ignore the other.
I know a lot of people making 400k. Don’t know anyone who couldn’t get a job, ever. I guess they exist, but I haven’t met them.
And jobs keep getting posted by the day while you guys keep posting “no jobs”…so when will you get realistic?Full professors at top 30 make that. GTF0, you tro11
Exactly. There are a lot more full professors at the top 30 than people who have failed the job market all time. But you guys are obsessed with one outcome while you ignore the other.
I know a lot of people making 400k. Don’t know anyone who couldn’t get a job, ever. I guess they exist, but I haven’t met them.
And jobs keep getting posted by the day while you guys keep posting “no jobs”…so when will you get realistic?Full professors at top 30 make that. GTF0, you tro11
This just shows you can't even reason straight. The level of competition twenty years ago determined who is full now. It is irrelevant to JMCs today.
Competition is fierce for any tenure track job, including teaching jobs, and it is only increasing every year.
Only 23 schools interviewing at AAA. There will probably be less than 100 tenure-track positions this year (previous years were, on average, the same).
There are 200 Accounting Ph.D. graduates every year.
Your chance of becoming a Full at top 30 is infinitesimal. Your chances of not getting a tenure-track job are very real at 40%.
Exactly. There are a lot more full professors at the top 30 than people who have failed the job market all time. But you guys are obsessed with one outcome while you ignore the other.I know a lot of people making 400k. Don’t know anyone who couldn’t get a job, ever. I guess they exist, but I haven’t met them.
And jobs keep getting posted by the day while you guys keep posting “no jobs”…so when will you get realistic?Full professors at top 30 make that. GTF0, you tro11
This just shows you can't even reason straight. The level of competition twenty years ago determined who is full now. It is irrelevant to JMCs today.
Competition is fierce for any tenure track job, including teaching jobs, and it is only increasing every year.
Only 23 schools interviewing at AAA. There will probably be less than 100 tenure-track positions this year (previous years were, on average, the same).
There are 200 Accounting Ph.D. graduates every year.
Your chance of becoming a Full at top 30 is infinitesimal. Your chances of not getting a tenure-track job are very real at 40%.
Those on the 1st and 2nd year of the program are lucky enough to know they must quit the program now, not after 6 years.
Ignorant of basic arithmetic, I was admitted to the accounting PhD program at Chicago. I never encountered anyone with more than a superficial understanding of multiplication and division during my time in the program. My advice to you is to drop your mathematics textbooks in the nearest trash can and pick up a textbook on flattery. Only people with brown noses who know how to brown-nose are successful in this profession.
Ignorant of basic arithmetic, I was admitted to the accounting PhD program at Chicago. I never encountered anyone with more than a superficial understanding of multiplication and division during my time in the program. My advice to you is to drop your mathematics textbooks in the nearest trash can and pick up a textbook on flattery. Only people with brown noses who know how to brown-nose are successful in this profession.
You should try to make your story more believable.
You cannot undo the history, you cannot erase the history, you just cannot continue to lie anymore!
- 7 months ago
- Pursuing a Ph.D. in Accounting. Is it worth?
https://www.econjobrumors.com/topic/pursuing-a-phd-in-accounting-is-it-worth
- 5 years ago
- Why is publishing in accounting is difficult?
https://www.econjobrumors.com/topic/why-is-publishing-in-accounting-is-difficult
- 2 years ago
- Why are accounting folks so terrible?
https://www.econjobrumors.com/topic/why-are-accounting-folks-so-terrible
- 3 years ago
- Is the accounting job market really becoming horrible?
https://www.econjobrumors.com/topic/is-the-accounting-job-market-really-becoming-horrible
PP can go Pee Pee
There is a different thread for discussing whether a PhD in Accounting is still worth it. Please, let's stay on topic here.
Is it true that PP from Berkeley plagiarized his Title IX testimony?The tally:
- plagiarism & self-plagiarism
- sleeping with students
- Title IX (reprimanded quietly)
- manipulative behavior against other profs and blocking of tenure candidates
What did we miss?