Just check out the resumes of CM, DK and NM on the behavioral side for BU. And now AK from Harvard. Very good work.
And then look at AF, GZ, and GJ. Low numbers but high quality, impactful work.
BU has been transformed completely in the last couple years. This is one of the most exciting faculty groups out there now, not to mention being in Boston is much better than Minnesota or Rochester.
Does any of these people survive the recent replication crisis in the behavior side?
Just check out the resumes of CM, DK and NM on the behavioral side for BU. And now AK from Harvard. Very good work.
And then look at AF, GZ, and GJ. Low numbers but high quality, impactful work.
BU has been transformed completely in the last couple years. This is one of the most exciting faculty groups out there now, not to mention being in Boston is much better than Minnesota or Rochester.
Does any of these people survive the recent replication crisis in the behavior side?
Just check out the resumes of CM, DK and NM on the behavioral side for BU. And now AK from Harvard. Very good work.
And then look at AF, GZ, and GJ. Low numbers but high quality, impactful work.
BU has been transformed completely in the last couple years. This is one of the most exciting faculty groups out there now, not to mention being in Boston is much better than Minnesota or Rochester.
Was there a complaint about CM or DK? Perhaps some of the NM studies are questionable.
Looks a collection of top school losers. Good strategy for place like BU
Just check out the resumes of CM, DK and NM on the behavioral side for BU. And now AK from Harvard. Very good work.
And then look at AF, GZ, and GJ. Low numbers but high quality, impactful work.
BU has been transformed completely in the last couple years. This is one of the most exciting faculty groups out there now, not to mention being in Boston is much better than Minnesota or Rochester.
BU == joke. Dunno why some people here think that it is even close to top 20. More like top 50. AF, whom no one wanted to touch, despite a top publication, went there. Definitely not a great place. Plus it is a distant third, even in its own city. Imagine walking up to someone at a Boston bar and saying that you work at BU
BU == joke. Dunno why some people here think that it is even close to top 20. More like top 50. AF, whom no one wanted to touch, despite a top publication, went there. Definitely not a great place. Plus it is a distant third, even in its own city. Imagine walking up to someone at a Boston bar and saying that you work at BU
Me: I work at BU.
Someone at a Boston bar: Cool. Go Pats.
Me: Go Pats.
807F, How do you imagine this interaction unfolds?
You mean this:
What do you think about this ranking:
https://jindal.utdallas.edu/the-utd-top-100-business-school-research-rankings/worldRankings#20142018If you use that engine to sort for the last 10 years, total pubs in JMR, JCR, and Mkt. Sci., worldwide ranking, you get what I’d consider a legitimate ranking, without any Northeast snobbery (BU ranks 51, by the way). The only adjustment I might make is dividing by number of tenure track marketing faculty, so smaller programs are not punished.
Hmmm. That ranking seems weird. I think they chose too short of a time horizon (just 2015-2018).
You mean this:
https://www.colorado.edu/business/faculty-research/faculty-research-rankings/marketing-utd-rankings-capitaWhat do you think about this ranking:
https://jindal.utdallas.edu/the-utd-top-100-business-school-research-rankings/worldRankings#20142018If you use that engine to sort for the last 10 years, total pubs in JMR, JCR, and Mkt. Sci., worldwide ranking, you get what I’d consider a legitimate ranking, without any Northeast snobbery (BU ranks 51, by the way). The only adjustment I might make is dividing by number of tenure track marketing faculty, so smaller programs are not punished.
BU == joke. Dunno why some people here think that it is even close to top 20. More like top 50. AF, whom no one wanted to touch, despite a top publication, went there. Definitely not a great place. Plus it is a distant third, even in its own city. Imagine walking up to someone at a Boston bar and saying that you work at BU
DK declined offers from Chicago, Wharton and Columbia, among others, went there.
NM, who left Toronto for BU, went there.
CM left CMU to go to BU.
Tell us about your CV.
Ans everyone is a distant third when the other two in comparison are Harvard and MIT.
BU == joke. Dunno why some people here think that it is even close to top 20. More like top 50. AF, whom no one wanted to touch, despite a top publication, went there. Definitely not a great place. Plus it is a distant third, even in its own city. Imagine walking up to someone at a Boston bar and saying that you work at BUDK declined offers from Chicago, Wharton and Columbia, among others, went there.
NM, who left Toronto for BU, went there.
CM left CMU to go to BU.
Tell us about your CV.
Ans everyone is a distant third when the other two in comparison are Harvard and MIT.
95D8, we know that you are a BU person anyway. You ate biased. It was your s**tty ranking that started this whole debate. Can we please stop this dumb discussion over BU? BU is not worth this much space on an EJMR thread. Let’s just stop. BU is a decent school. Good location. Hired a bunch of good people recently. Definitely not top 20 right now, but maybe in 10-15 years. Now let’s just stop with this whole BU discussion. Please.
Not understanding this basic point is like not understanding that prices are endogenous--> Stanford is *really* good at training quant marketers.
Michigan too. 2 out of 3 rookies from Stanford.
IM got Kellogg quant offer
If confirmed, good for him
Once you hire 1-2 Stanford people, they make sure they hire more from there
See: Chicago