can someone tell how did VK get a gang around him?he is a legend in marketing
https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/legends-in-marketing-v-kumar/book240105It costs $1,190...
That title font tho
Official Marketing JM 2020 Thread
-
At least he is better than BU behavior people (and quant, maybe).
So he could use his so-called quant skills to publish JCR or psychological science. Good for him. But he is not considered quant.
Yep. But his dissertation was classic psychometrics, and he worked primarily with DeSarbo. Some other work is Bayesian. He knows quant as well as most modelers, if you look at his work or even talk to him.
SB is not quant. By any standards. Adding some math to behavioral questions does not make you quant.
Serious question. What behavioral questions are not also quant questions? Behavior generates quant data.
-
insider info: I heard (can't confirm) that Ping D (out of Kellog, two recent retracted papers, consumer behavior) was responding to her own experiment surveys, IN THE LAB at 1-3am (when no one was at the university), to achieve the results she hypothesized. this was found out by IT guys.
-
Did anyone see this?
datacolada. org / 82
Simmons and Nelson (who blog with Uri Simonsohn) tried to replicate a JMR paper ("Having Control Over and Above Situations: The Influence of Elevated Viewpoints on Risk Taking") on their blog. Using three times the sample size as the original study, they found no evidence of the effect.
Any thoughts on the future of CB given the replication crisis/data police knocking on people's door?
-
Did anyone see this?
datacolada. org / 82
Simmons and Nelson (who blog with Uri Simonsohn) tried to replicate a JMR paper ("Having Control Over and Above Situations: The Influence of Elevated Viewpoints on Risk Taking") on their blog. Using three times the sample size as the original study, they found no evidence of the effect.
Any thoughts on the future of CB given the replication crisis/data police knocking on people's door?Kellogg?
-
Did anyone see this?
datacolada. org / 82
Simmons and Nelson (who blog with Uri Simonsohn) tried to replicate a JMR paper ("Having Control Over and Above Situations: The Influence of Elevated Viewpoints on Risk Taking") on their blog. Using three times the sample size as the original study, they found no evidence of the effect.
Any thoughts on the future of CB given the replication crisis/data police knocking on people's door?Kellogg?
What do you mean?
-
Toronto: RC and DA
any updates?
Where did DG decide?
Did NYU make another offer?
Did Miami get anyone?
Who did Toronto hire?
DA accepted Toronto?
DG hasn't officially made a decision yet as far as I've heard (but is down to LBS and Kellogg)
NYU made an offer to JL (UPenn OID), which he'll likely accept (he doesn't have other offers, I think)
Miami hired EP (UW). They made a CB offer as well (likely DG based on their flyout list), which was declined.
And yup -- DA accepted Toronto -
Did anyone see this?
datacolada. org / 82
Simmons and Nelson (who blog with Uri Simonsohn) tried to replicate a JMR paper ("Having Control Over and Above Situations: The Influence of Elevated Viewpoints on Risk Taking") on their blog. Using three times the sample size as the original study, they found no evidence of the effect.
Any thoughts on the future of CB given the replication crisis/data police knocking on people's door?I think realistically if the data police were given the resources to run pre-registered replications of the whole of JCR and JCP, about 25% would replicate (it's about 36% in psychology, which is generally more rigorous). The fun part is predicting in advance which kinds of studies would replicate or not. Significant predictors of failure would be: small sample sizes (<100 per cell), priming tasks, scenario studies, papers citing the Hayes SPSS mediation add-on....what else?
-
Did anyone see this?
datacolada. org / 82
Simmons and Nelson (who blog with Uri Simonsohn) tried to replicate a JMR paper ("Having Control Over and Above Situations: The Influence of Elevated Viewpoints on Risk Taking") on their blog. Using three times the sample size as the original study, they found no evidence of the effect.
Any thoughts on the future of CB given the replication crisis/data police knocking on people's door?I think realistically if the data police were given the resources to run pre-registered replications of the whole of JCR and JCP, about 25% would replicate (it's about 36% in psychology, which is generally more rigorous). The fun part is predicting in advance which kinds of studies would replicate or not. Significant predictors of failure would be: small sample sizes (<100 per cell), priming tasks, scenario studies, papers citing the Hayes SPSS mediation add-on....what else?
Probably: studies involving construal level theory, incidental emotions, preference "reversals", and anything that is either too subtle or that relies on influences carrying over from task to task. Which is a bunch of JCR/JCP.
Does anyone think the field as a whole will change into this direction (e.g., preregistration, data posting, replication by third parties, etc.), or is it the case that some people will unluckily be scrutinized by the data police?
I guess current PhD students and junior faculty are better off not bulls**tting. People who already made their names/got away with it are fine, but the slightest suspicious can make you get screwed.
-
I’m a CB. And I’m gonna crush the market this year. We can revisit this claim in 10 months.
How is it going? Now it is the time
Ha. Funny story. I did crush it. I got a great job. My application to job offer ratio was 1:1. I signed an offer before Thanksgiving. And I did it without stress or anxiety. Because... Winners win.
.
.
.
Mic drop.