Close

Complete Captcha

• 1 year - 3416 posts - Latest - RSS
• Thread: 2304 Goods vs 1358 No Goods

1. Economist
   2a43
   

   Don't forget Toubia and Goldfarb. And there are some AEs who are known to be thorough, Danaher, van Heerde, Feinberg, Neslin, Manchanda. Others have been let go for phoning it in. Despite the gripes about JMR, Grewal is doing a great job. And I agree Moorman has transformed JM. Submissions way up from the old horsetrading days.

   Make folks like these as Editors...Field will progress rapidly:
   Marketing Science [HN-Stanford]
   Management Science [JJZ - MIT & SM - Chicago]
   JCR [RK - Columbia]
   QME [JP Dube - Chicago]
   These are the only A's we count at our school
   

   Moorman us exceptional. I have a better opinion of JM than MKSC now. Will submit. She clearly cares and puts the time in.

   QME is stellar. Every paper they publish is well above the MKSC average, putting it above them.

   FF is sloooow. JPD and HN - great authors - but too dogmatic

   3 months ago # QUOTE 4 Good 1 No Good !

2. Economist
   2a43
   

   FYI the winning team also has an assoc who never served in an editorial position until last year. YKWIM?

   My colleague was there, and what you say is spot on.
   What the other person said is just foolishness, as a quick glance at the composition of the teams revealed. I don't know what they were thinking including an Associate prof to be an Editor at the top journal.

   If you believe that the team was passed over "completely dominated" the selected team, you are being one-eyed. The selected team contains 2 ACR presidents and one person with editorial experience. The non-selected team contained no ACR presidents, one SCP president, no people with editorial experience, and one associate professor. They had their merits, but they also had their drawbacks.
   Unless you were in the room, how do you know whose pitch was better?/blockquote>

   Post the losing team. People in marketing favored their buddies for so long.

   If you do not want poor future editorial choices, you have to remind people that everyone’s eyes are on them here.

   3 months ago # QUOTE 3 Good 1 No Good !

3. Economist
   1ffd
   

   Agree about Moorman. Curious how you know who is quick and not as AE (didn't have that experience with FF, but it was just one paper. DID have it with two others, and a couple of reviewers who never responded... WTF?) Are those stats published somewhere?

   Moorman us exceptional. I have a better opinion of JM than MKSC now. Will submit. She clearly cares and puts the time in.
   QME is stellar. Every paper they publish is well above the MKSC average, putting it above them.
   FF is sloooow. JPD and HN - great authors - but too dogmatic

   3 months ago # QUOTE 1 Good 0 No Good !

4. Economist
   fc18
   

   Anyone who feels this way can make a formal inquiry with the committee chair, who I think was Bob Meyer. Asking random people to reveal info third-hand is a great way to get bad data out into the world.

   Post the losing team. People in marketing favored their buddies for so long.
   If you do not want poor future editorial choices, you have to remind people that everyone’s eyes are on them here.

   3 months ago # QUOTE 0 Good 1 No Good !

5. Economist
   2a43
   

   Anyone who feels this way can make a formal inquiry with the committee chair, who I think was Bob Meyer. Asking random people to reveal info third-hand is a great way to get bad data out into the world.

   Post the losing team. People in marketing favored their buddies for so long.
   If you do not want poor future editorial choices, you have to remind people that everyone’s eyes are on them here.
   

   Expecting Bob Meyer to make an explanation is idiotic. This website reveals a lot of true preferences which otherwise do not come to surface.

   3 months ago # QUOTE 2 Good 0 No Good !

6. Economist
   2a43
   

   JJZ was not a good editor - too indifferent

   AG is excellent. Has balls.

   3 months ago # QUOTE 1 Good 1 No Good !

7. Economist
   000c
   

   Hi Bob

   Anyone who feels this way can make a formal inquiry with the committee chair, who I think was Bob Meyer. Asking random people to reveal info third-hand is a great way to get bad data out into the world.

   Post the losing team. People in marketing favored their buddies for so long.
   If you do not want poor future editorial choices, you have to remind people that everyone’s eyes are on them here.
   

   3 months ago # QUOTE 0 Good 0 No Good !

8. Economist
   f9bb
   

   Mksc is not for the faint hearted

   3 months ago # QUOTE 1 Good 0 No Good !

9. Economist
   f968
   

   Yawn.

   Bob is too classy to post here.

   I happened to know most of the opposing team, but it is not my place or anyone else’s to reveal who they are if they don’t want to reveal themselves.

   Hi Bob

   Anyone who feels this way can make a formal inquiry with the committee chair, who I think was Bob Meyer. Asking random people to reveal info third-hand is a great way to get bad data out into the world.

   Post the losing team. People in marketing favored their buddies for so long.
   If you do not want poor future editorial choices, you have to remind people that everyone’s eyes are on them here.
   

   3 months ago # QUOTE 1 Good 1 No Good !

10. Economist
    4ecd
    

    One person from each of the teams would make / have made a super editor. I have my doubts about all the others. Time will tell. I believe that if the other team had been selected, we'd have had very similar reactions on this board.

    3 months ago # QUOTE 1 Good 0 No Good !

11. Economist
    cc8c
    

    Is marketingphdjobs hacked? I end up with a spammy survey on the main site

    3 months ago # QUOTE 0 Good 0 No Good !

12. Economist
    cc8c
    

    JCR board lost credibility when EA and AE was allowed to vote for LP’s team

    FYI the winning team also has an assoc who never served in an editorial position until last year. YKWIM?

    My colleague was there, and what you say is spot on.
    What the other person said is just foolishness, as a quick glance at the composition of the teams revealed. I don't know what they were thinking including an Associate prof to be an Editor at the top journal.

    If you believe that the team was passed over "completely dominated" the selected team, you are being one-eyed. The selected team contains 2 ACR presidents and one person with editorial experience. The non-selected team contained no ACR presidents, one SCP president, no people with editorial experience, and one associate professor. They had their merits, but they also had their drawbacks.
    Unless you were in the room, how do you know whose pitch was better?/blockquote>

    Post the losing team. People in marketing favored their buddies for so long.
    If you do not want poor future editorial choices, you have to remind people that everyone’s eyes are on them here.

    3 months ago # QUOTE 1 Good 0 No Good !

13. Economist
    24da
    

    Hi Bob

    Yawn.
    Bob is too classy to post here.
    I happened to know most of the opposing team, but it is not my place or anyone else’s to reveal who they are if they don’t want to reveal themselves.

    Hi Bob

    Anyone who feels this way can make a formal inquiry with the committee chair, who I think was Bob Meyer. Asking random people to reveal info third-hand is a great way to get bad data out into the world.

    Post the losing team. People in marketing favored their buddies for so long.
    If you do not want poor future editorial choices, you have to remind people that everyone’s eyes are on them here.

    3 months ago # QUOTE 0 Good 1 No Good !

14. Economist
    fc18
    

    That was a different board. Different people and all that.

    JCR board lost credibility when EA and AE was allowed to vote for LP’s team

    3 months ago # QUOTE 0 Good 1 No Good !

15. Economist
    fc18
    

    OK, the second time, it's pretty funny.

    Hi Bob

    Yawn.
    Bob is too classy to post here.
    I happened to know most of the opposing team, but it is not my place or anyone else’s to reveal who they are if they don’t want to reveal themselves.

    Hi Bob
    

    3 months ago # QUOTE 0 Good 0 No Good !

16. Economist
    ea71
    

    Don't forget Toubia and Goldfarb. And there are some AEs who are known to be thorough, Danaher, van Heerde, Feinberg, Neslin, Manchanda. Others have been let go for phoning it in. Despite the gripes about JMR, Grewal is doing a great job. And I agree Moorman has transformed JM. Submissions way up from the old horsetrading days.

    Make folks like these as Editors...Field will progress rapidly:
    Marketing Science [HN-Stanford]
    Management Science [JJZ - MIT & SM - Chicago]
    JCR [RK - Columbia]
    QME [JP Dube - Chicago]
    These are the only A's we count at our school
    

    Moorman us exceptional. I have a better opinion of JM than MKSC now. Will submit. She clearly cares and puts the time in.
    QME is stellar. Every paper they publish is well above the MKSC average, putting it above them.
    FF is sloooow. JPD and HN - great authors - but too dogmatic

    Seriously? I know JPD and GH [Chicago] have strong opinions but their peers HN & SN [Stanford] are equally intelligent and flexible...

    3 months ago # QUOTE 0 Good 0 No Good !

17. Economist
    8aee
    

    test

    3 months ago # QUOTE 0 Good 0 No Good !

18. Economist
    8aee
    

    At AMA and there are rumors VK is no longer at GSU and looking for a visiting position somewhere anywhere. Anyone else hear this? Seems like GSU is keeping this super quiet.

    3 months ago # QUOTE 0 Good 0 No Good !

19. Economist
    0dfd
    

    At AMA and there are rumors VK is no longer at GSU and looking for a visiting position somewhere anywhere. Anyone else hear this? Seems like GSU is keeping this super quiet.

    He’s looking for other places. So are his students

    3 months ago # QUOTE 0 Good 0 No Good !

20. Economist
    9fd8
    

    At AMA and there are rumors VK is no longer at GSU and looking for a visiting position somewhere anywhere. Anyone else hear this? Seems like GSU is keeping this super quiet.

    Wasn't there a whole another thread about this?

    3 months ago # QUOTE 0 Good 0 No Good !

Reply »