Close

Complete Captcha

• 1 year - 3416 posts - Latest - RSS
• Thread: 2304 Goods vs 1358 No Goods

1. Economist
   2b94
   

   Indeed. Also, you don’t have to limit yourself to the 4 marketing As. If you have an A pub in a related field and can show you have a marketing research agenda you’ll do fine on the market. So if you’re doing behavioral work send your stuff to a top psych journal (Psych Science, JPSP), or if you’ve pre registered your studies and they have an important societal outcome send it to one of the general interest outlets (Science, Nature,PNAS). Or you can send it to one of the management journals. You just have to show you can publish and that your work matters for marketing. And remember, the median number of A pubs for people who get hired is ZERO.

   OK OK everyone in both teams suck. Lets get back to the job market
   I am a 3rd year student and struggling with my papers right now due to JCRs sudden twist.
   Those in the job market and trying to get their papers out, how are you trying to navigate editorial changes? JM seems OK but not my papers fill in that zone, I don't know what JCR wants from me, and JMR is now pure non-behavioural. I need a job and I need an A-pub strategy. What will JCR publish given these odd editorial picks in the last few years>?

   "struggling with my papers right now due to JCRs sudden twist."
   stop writing papers based on who the editor is and you will be fine.

   3 months ago # QUOTE 3 Good 4 No Good !

2. Economist
   9ed8
   

   “Send it to Science if you cannot get into JCR”

   Lol

   3 months ago # QUOTE 6 Good 0 No Good !

3. Economist
   2b94
   

   “Send it to Science if you cannot get into JCR”
   Lol

   Counterpoint to your lol:

   Vohs, K. D., Mead, N. L., & Goode, M. R. (2006). The psychological consequences of money. science, 314(5802), 1154-1156.

   https://science.sciencemag.org/content/314/5802/1154

   This was rejected at JCR.

   3 months ago # QUOTE 2 Good 1 No Good !

4. Economist
   b2ac
   

   AK is exacting and principled. Political she is not. Pretty much the opposite, actually, for anyone who actually knows her.

   I am not CCT but a CCT friend told me the rumor is that most senior people are seen as too toxic and political to be editors. They eat their own, and many teams do not want that kind of a person. Frankly not sure if this is exclusive for CCT (looking at you JI and AK) but at least they are trying

   3 months ago # QUOTE 1 Good 0 No Good !

5. Economist
   b2ac
   

   Spot on. Two things:

   It's number of completed manuscripts, and where they are in the publication process, that's a much better metric.

   And it's way different for quant and cb. A quant is lucky to have something in second round at an A journal. Top cb candidates sometimes have several A pubs when going on the market.

   And remember, the median number of A pubs for people who get hired is ZERO.

   3 months ago # QUOTE 0 Good 3 No Good !

6. Economist
   a0d3
   

   “Send it to Science if you cannot get into JCR”
   Lol

   Counterpoint to your lol:
   Vohs, K. D., Mead, N. L., & Goode, M. R. (2006). The psychological consequences of money. science, 314(5802), 1154-1156.
   https://science.sciencemag.org/content/314/5802/1154
   This was rejected at JCR.

   The article with a “correction”?

   3 months ago # QUOTE 6 Good 0 No Good !

7. Economist
   3f31
   

   That Vohs article in Science is a terrible example. P-hacked to death.

   The debunking has been thorough:

   http://uweb.cas.usf.edu/~drohrer/pdfs/Rohrer_et_al_2015JEPG.pdf

   https://psycnet.apa.org/fulltext/2016-17976-001.pdf

   3 months ago # QUOTE 9 Good 0 No Good !

8. Economist
   83af
   

   This is the correction:
   In the Report The psychological consequences of money, Fig. 1A had an incorrect marker and incorrectly drawn lines. The corrected figure is shown here. In the 21st paragraph, second sentence, “low-money condition” and “control condition” should have been reversed. In the last sentence of the 23rd paragraph, the degrees of freedom should have been 42 instead of 38. In the last sentence of the fourth-to-last paragraph, “t(34)” should have been “χ2(1)”. These changes do not affect the conclusions of the paper.

   OH NO!!! HORRIBLE. (sarcasm)

   “Send it to Science if you cannot get into JCR”
   Lol

   Counterpoint to your lol:
   Vohs, K. D., Mead, N. L., & Goode, M. R. (2006). The psychological consequences of money. science, 314(5802), 1154-1156.
   https://science.sciencemag.org/content/314/5802/1154
   This was rejected at JCR.

   The article with a “correction”?

   3 months ago # QUOTE 0 Good 5 No Good !

9. Economist
   c9c4
   

   AK is just the worst editor, who doesn’t really know what research is.

   AK is exacting and principled. Political she is not. Pretty much the opposite, actually, for anyone who actually knows her.

   I am not CCT but a CCT friend told me the rumor is that most senior people are seen as too toxic and political to be editors. They eat their own, and many teams do not want that kind of a person. Frankly not sure if this is exclusive for CCT (looking at you JI and AK) but at least they are trying

   3 months ago # QUOTE 3 Good 1 No Good !

10. Economist
    b2ac
    

    Tell Stanford that, because she rejected your paper, they should take her PhD back.

    AK is just the worst editor, who doesn’t really know what research is.

    3 months ago # QUOTE 2 Good 1 No Good !

11. Economist
    33f2
    

    any junior faculties moving?

    3 months ago # QUOTE 0 Good 0 No Good !

12. Economist
    33f2
    

    btw, rumor was that GZ to be hired by Columbia. But what happened?

    3 months ago # QUOTE 0 Good 1 No Good !

13. Economist
    f968
    

    GZ from Yale? Great guy. But Columbia and Wharton sure do seem to like people from one particular country.

    btw, rumor was that GZ to be hired by Columbia. But what happened?

    3 months ago # QUOTE 1 Good 1 No Good !

14. Economist
    33f2
    

    GZ from Yale? Great guy. But Columbia and Wharton sure do seem to like people from one particular country.

    btw, rumor was that GZ to be hired by Columbia. But what happened?
    

    no, GZ at BU.
    what is the particular country?

    3 months ago # QUOTE 1 Good 0 No Good !

15. Economist
    3e71
    

    GZ from Yale? Great guy. But Columbia and Wharton sure do seem to like people from one particular country.

    btw, rumor was that GZ to be hired by Columbia. But what happened?
    

    no, GZ at BU.
    what is the particular country?

    The one in middle east, I guess?

    3 months ago # QUOTE 0 Good 0 No Good !

16. Economist
    9fd8
    

    GZ from Yale? Great guy. But Columbia and Wharton sure do seem to like people from one particular country.

    btw, rumor was that GZ to be hired by Columbia. But what happened?
    

    no, GZ at BU.
    what is the particular country?

    The one in middle east, I guess?

    Not anymore.

    and GZ was shopping around before tenure, then got tenure, and I guess is staying around

    Columbia needs new blood

    3 months ago # QUOTE 0 Good 0 No Good !

17. Economist
    33f2
    

    Not anymore.
    and GZ was shopping around before tenure, then got tenure, and I guess is staying around
    Columbia needs new blood

    why did not Columbia hire GZ as their new blood

    3 months ago # QUOTE 0 Good 0 No Good !

18. Economist
    6dcd
    

    Nobody believes KV’s research.

    “Send it to Science if you cannot get into JCR”
    Lol

    Counterpoint to your lol:
    Vohs, K. D., Mead, N. L., & Goode, M. R. (2006). The psychological consequences of money. science, 314(5802), 1154-1156.
    https://science.sciencemag.org/content/314/5802/1154
    This was rejected at JCR.

    3 months ago # QUOTE 12 Good 0 No Good !

19. Economist
    9325
    

    Indeed, and the only one with a gay pride parade, if that helps.

    The one in middle east, I guess?

    3 months ago # QUOTE 0 Good 0 No Good !

20. Economist
    33f2
    

    Indeed, and the only one with a gay pride parade, if that helps.

    The one in middle east, I guess?
    

    Then nothing special about Columbia or Wharton. Applies to every school.

    3 months ago # QUOTE 0 Good 0 No Good !

Reply »