Any news about DA from insead?
Official Marketing JM 2020 Thread
-
Not very impressive after tenure either, seems 5 A pub in 10 years.
How could he get tenure at that time??
Come on. Before tenure, no A pub except a 3rd author econometrica which is not even alphabetical. Wondering what the first two authors think as he claimed credit. His students gave him A pub after tenure. Have to say better students
This is foolish. If you want to argue against his tenure case, you have to base it on what he did SINCE he got tenure. Tenure decisions should be about looking forward, not looking backward. Otherwise you're just a bean counter.
-
That doesn’t make sense. DA’s paper is clearly dominating and different people do better at different places. There are many other good candidates too.
Is she getting Stanford or they went with someone else?
Got Toronto offer
Any news about DA from insead?
She's been dominated by YK at NYU and Columbia so Stanford is unlikely too.
-
Stanford should hire a female. They have not had a quant female for a decade. Why not DA?
I don’t know whatever happened to MD. She is not in academia anymore? MS survived Stanford shock.
My guess is SH will not make it there so they need women.Disgusting that something like that plays a role
-
What's Stanford shock?
Stanford should hire a female. They have not had a quant female for a decade. Why not DA?
I don’t know whatever happened to MD. She is not in academia anymore? MS survived Stanford shock.
My guess is SH will not make it there so they need women. -
It does not. No one gets hired for being female. They get hired for being competent and good at what they do.
Stanford should hire a female. They have not had a quant female for a decade. Why not DA?
I don’t know whatever happened to MD. She is not in academia anymore? MS survived Stanford shock.
My guess is SH will not make it there so they need women.Disgusting that something like that plays a role
-
It does not. No one gets hired for being female. They get hired for being competent and good at what they do.
Stanford should hire a female. They have not had a quant female for a decade. Why not DA?
I don’t know whatever happened to MD. She is not in academia anymore? MS survived Stanford shock.
My guess is SH will not make it there so they need women.Disgusting that something like that plays a role
You are clearly not from this planet...
-
It does not. No one gets hired for being female. They get hired for being competent and good at what they do.
Stanford should hire a female. They have not had a quant female for a decade. Why not DA?
I don’t know whatever happened to MD. She is not in academia anymore? MS survived Stanford shock.
My guess is SH will not make it there so they need women.Disgusting that something like that plays a role
I literally laughed when I read this
-
It does not. No one gets hired for being female. They get hired for being competent and good at what they do.
Stanford should hire a female. They have not had a quant female for a decade. Why not DA?
I don’t know whatever happened to MD. She is not in academia anymore? MS survived Stanford shock.
My guess is SH will not make it there so they need women.Disgusting that something like that plays a role
Great joke!
-
What's Stanford shock?
Stanford should hire a female. They have not had a quant female for a decade. Why not DA?
I don’t know whatever happened to MD. She is not in academia anymore? MS survived Stanford shock.
My guess is SH will not make it there so they need women.
Seriously: Everyone talks about Stanford's Marketing Department...What's the real deal there? I have heard it's a very very difficult place to be in and survive? Is it just the pressure or some politics going on there...They tried to hire JJZ (MIT) and offered her a full professorship....still she didn't join!