Never seen a jmc with a single top econ journal. Anyone?
It's hard to imagine a jmc pulling this off. Econ top fields are slower and have a higher bar than any top marketing journal.
Official Marketing JM 2021 Thread
-
Never seen a jmc with a single top econ journal. Anyone?
It's hard to imagine a jmc pulling this off. Econ top fields are slower and have a higher bar than any top marketing journal.
RB who ended up at CU’s JMP was past the first round at Econometrica but I think it ended up rejected.
The number of marketing faculty with publications in Science probably exceeds the number in ECTA- DA and DP’s paper is the only one I know of. -
DA and DP’s paper is in QJE. How silly of me. DP has a single author ECTA
Never seen a jmc with a single top econ journal. Anyone?
It's hard to imagine a jmc pulling this off. Econ top fields are slower and have a higher bar than any top marketing journal.
RB who ended up at CU’s JMP was past the first round at Econometrica but I think it ended up rejected.
The number of marketing faculty with publications in Science probably exceeds the number in ECTA- DA and DP’s paper is the only one I know of. -
Never seen a jmc with a single top econ journal. Anyone?
It's hard to imagine a jmc pulling this off. Econ top fields are slower and have a higher bar than any top marketing journal.
Your logic is like this: I have never seen an Econ JMC with a single top medical journal. Anyone? Medical journals have a higher bar then any top Econ journal.
Marketing docs are not trained for publishing in Econ journals. There are two different fields. Okay?
-
Never seen a jmc with a single top econ journal. Anyone?
It's hard to imagine a jmc pulling this off. Econ top fields are slower and have a higher bar than any top marketing journal.
Your logic is like this: I have never seen an Econ JMC with a single top medical journal. Anyone? Medical journals have a higher bar then any top Econ journal.
Marketing docs are not trained for publishing in Econ journals. There are two different fields. Okay?That is bull c. Half of marketing depts are full of economists, not MDs. These are not two different fields. Train your doctoral students so they have a shot at Econometrica or American Economic Review some day.
-
That’s not true actually. Two separate people I can think of have JAMA papers. PU at Duke works with PhD students, so it happens
Never seen a jmc with a single top econ journal. Anyone?
It's hard to imagine a jmc pulling this off. Econ top fields are slower and have a higher bar than any top marketing journal.
Your logic is like this: I have never seen an Econ JMC with a single top medical journal. Anyone? Medical journals have a higher bar then any top Econ journal.
Marketing docs are not trained for publishing in Econ journals. There are two different fields. Okay? -
I mean.... he’s got multiple QJEs, I think he has a JPE, he has a Science, he has a nature, in addition to an AER. He was publishing on replication issues as a side gig long before that was even a thing (he’s got a 2003 paper on it?). He’s one of five or so “legit” behavioral economists in the world. I don’t think the “surprising option paper” is clear as it should be or as interesting as people say it is but that is wholly personal taste. That’s in Nature and was 3 years ago.
He has the luxury of going big or going home- and his last student placed really well 3 years ago.
Re DP - published an ECTA 30+ years ago and little since then. How is he even relevant?
-
That requires working with someone who publishes in those outlets. It’s I guess a weird quirk of history that there are only a few marketing programs where there’s an intersection of faculty in the business school or in the Econ department where they’re hitting top 3 regularly in areas that a marketing person would research and the marketing department recruits students capable of producing ECTA level insight. It’s way more common to find, you know, psych departments where people are hitting JEPG and JPSP and marketing students who are capable of hitting those journals (as a behavioral person, the bar is lower there than Econ top 3).
Never seen a jmc with a single top econ journal. Anyone?
It's hard to imagine a jmc pulling this off. Econ top fields are slower and have a higher bar than any top marketing journal.
Your logic is like this: I have never seen an Econ JMC with a single top medical journal. Anyone? Medical journals have a higher bar then any top Econ journal.
Marketing docs are not trained for publishing in Econ journals. There are two different fields. Okay?That is bull c. Half of marketing depts are full of economists, not MDs. These are not two different fields. Train your doctoral students so they have a shot at Econometrica or American Economic Review some day.
-
I mean.... he’s got multiple QJEs, I think he has a JPE, he has a Science, he has a nature, in addition to an AER. He was publishing on replication issues as a side gig long before that was even a thing (he’s got a 2003 paper on it?). He’s one of five or so “legit” behavioral economists in the world. I don’t think the “surprising option paper” is clear as it should be or as interesting as people say it is but that is wholly personal taste. That’s in Nature and was 3 years ago.
He has the luxury of going big or going home- and his last student placed really well 3 years ago.Re DP - published an ECTA 30+ years ago and little since then. How is he even relevant?
Why are you even discussing DP? He does not have a marketing Phd, he is not in a marketing dept at MIT
And in his 40 year career he has only published 3A journal marketing papers. 5 in total in ALL marketing outlets. Any assistant professor in marketing has more marketing contribution than that.
Don't get me wrong. He is great, but he is not a marketing person.
DP also does not consider himself to be a marketing person. -
He’s relevant because he’s putting people on the marketing market so you’ll be interacting with him and reading LORs. He’s pretty active in my subfield, even if he’s not publishing much you interact with him a fair amount. It’s weird that there would be any argument about his relevance- he’s not completely withdrawn like some senior folks.
I mean.... he’s got multiple QJEs, I think he has a JPE, he has a Science, he has a nature, in addition to an AER. He was publishing on replication issues as a side gig long before that was even a thing (he’s got a 2003 paper on it?). He’s one of five or so “legit” behavioral economists in the world. I don’t think the “surprising option paper” is clear as it should be or as interesting as people say it is but that is wholly personal taste. That’s in Nature and was 3 years ago.
He has the luxury of going big or going home- and his last student placed really well 3 years ago.Re DP - published an ECTA 30+ years ago and little since then. How is he even relevant?
Why are you even discussing DP? He does not have a marketing Phd, he is not in a marketing dept at MIT
And in his 40 year career he has only published 3A journal marketing papers. 5 in total in ALL marketing outlets. Any assistant professor in marketing has more marketing contribution than that.
Don't get me wrong. He is great, but he is not a marketing person.
DP also does not consider himself to be a marketing person. -
He’s relevant because he’s putting people on the marketing market so you’ll be interacting with him and reading LORs. He’s pretty active in my subfield, even if he’s not publishing much you interact with him a fair amount. It’s weird that there would be any argument about his relevance- he’s not completely withdrawn like some senior folks.
I mean.... he’s got multiple QJEs, I think he has a JPE, he has a Science, he has a nature, in addition to an AER. He was publishing on replication issues as a side gig long before that was even a thing (he’s got a 2003 paper on it?). He’s one of five or so “legit” behavioral economists in the world. I don’t think the “surprising option paper” is clear as it should be or as interesting as people say it is but that is wholly personal taste. That’s in Nature and was 3 years ago.
He has the luxury of going big or going home- and his last student placed really well 3 years ago.Re DP - published an ECTA 30+ years ago and little since then. How is he even relevant?
Why are you even discussing DP? He does not have a marketing Phd, he is not in a marketing dept at MIT
And in his 40 year career he has only published 3A journal marketing papers. 5 in total in ALL marketing outlets. Any assistant professor in marketing has more marketing contribution than that.
Don't get me wrong. He is great, but he is not a marketing person.
DP also does not consider himself to be a marketing person.
Aside from JM at Wharton, who else did he place into marketing?
-
Never seen a jmc with a single top econ journal. Anyone?
It's hard to imagine a jmc pulling this off. Econ top fields are slower and have a higher bar than any top marketing journal.
Your logic is like this: I have never seen an Econ JMC with a single top medical journal. Anyone? Medical journals have a higher bar then any top Econ journal.
Marketing docs are not trained for publishing in Econ journals. There are two different fields. Okay?That is bull c. Half of marketing depts are full of economists, not MDs. These are not two different fields. Train your doctoral students so they have a shot at Econometrica or American Economic Review some day.
Who cares econ journal? Funny.
-
SB was his last student right? Postdoc at Princeton then Utah. I dunno what the story is there.
Aside from JM at Wharton, who else did he place into marketing?
Utah pays ALL the monies!
Hire me Utah!
I can drink at home.Utah is planning to block pron on your phone.
-
Epic brewing is in SLC. it has to be the only school that pays a living wage in the mountain west, right?
SB was his last student right? Postdoc at Princeton then Utah. I dunno what the story is there.
Aside from JM at Wharton, who else did he place into marketing?
Utah pays ALL the monies!
Hire me Utah!
I can drink at home.