Close

Complete Captcha

• 1 year - 5822 posts - Latest - RSS
• Thread: 4516 Goods vs 2207 No Goods

1. Economist
   dc78
   

   Name one scholar whose contributions have significantly changed business practice? Hard to think of one, at least in marketing and management

   How about Paul Green?
   https://pages.charlotte.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/868/2014/12/conjoint.pdf

   Frank Bass of Bass model fame. He used to get calls from Wall Street because of his model and its predictions. Recently host of Marketing academics have joined Amazon and other similar cos. Of course, in the area of social psych it may be more difficult to find managerial relevance since they don't care about it much. At JCR at most one para is needed to justify managerial relevance but at JMR and MS whole paper is not sufficient many times

   1 year ago # QUOTE 1 Volod 1 Vlad !

2. Economist
   b824
   

   How many job market candidates with A-level publications?

   Usually about 10-15% of the candidates have A-level publications

   1 year ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 0 Vlad !

3. Economist
   ecc4
   

   An A publication is a very very strong signal, but certainly not a shoe in. Many papers get through the review process that shouldn’t, but these usually get caught by the hiring committee when the read the actual work. Many cases of the top schools hiring new APs without anything but R&Rs.

   1 year ago # QUOTE 1 Volod 0 Vlad !

4. Economist
   67b5
   

   Some schools have a hard rule where they only take people with at least one pub. Personally, I think this is a mistake but it’s good to know where they are when you’re on the market. Notre Dame is one of them, for example.

   An A publication is a very very strong signal, but certainly not a shoe in. Many papers get through the review process that shouldn’t, but these usually get caught by the hiring committee when the read the actual work. Many cases of the top schools hiring new APs without anything but R&Rs.

   1 year ago # QUOTE 1 Volod 0 Vlad !

5. Economist
   b5b7
   

   What are some examples of papers that get through the review process that shouldn't? Why is a hiring committee more qualified than the reviewers?

   (I know you are right, but I want to engage this discussion.)

   Another fruitful for discussion for candidates: what is literally a show in? A papers may put people in a campus visit. But what puts people IN?

   1 year ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 1 Vlad !

6. Economist
   3da2
   

   RD (Duke). JCP and JCR (maybe more on the way).

   Who are the stars of the market?
   

   only 1 first author?

   That seems to be the case. Still, a first authored JCR this early is rare.

   That's true. But I wonder how committee value a 3rd / 4th author paper in hiring.

   1 year ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 0 Vlad !

7. Economist
   b824
   

   RD (Duke). JCP and JCR (maybe more on the way).

   That's true. But I wonder how committee value a 3rd / 4th author paper in hiring.

   Having a 3rd/4th author publication in a top journal is a weak signal, but it still helps candidates. But if the candidate has a first author A-level publication, then 3rd/4th author publications matter very little.

   1 year ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 0 Vlad !

8. Economist
   704b
   

   What are some examples of papers that get through the review process that shouldn't? Why is a hiring committee more qualified than the reviewers?
   (I know you are right, but I want to engage this discussion.)
   Another fruitful for discussion for candidates: what is literally a show in? A papers may put people in a campus visit. But what puts people IN?

   Powerful advisor

   1 year ago # QUOTE 1 Volod 1 Vlad !

9. Economist
   8f1b
   

   There are at least a few academics fielding these calls from Wall Street people these days

   Name one scholar whose contributions have significantly changed business practice? Hard to think of one, at least in marketing and management

   How about Paul Green?
   https://pages.charlotte.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/868/2014/12/conjoint.pdf

   Frank Bass of Bass model fame. He used to get calls from Wall Street because of his model and its predictions. Recently host of Marketing academics have joined Amazon and other similar cos. Of course, in the area of social psych it may be more difficult to find managerial relevance since they don't care about it much. At JCR at most one para is needed to justify managerial relevance but at JMR and MS whole paper is not sufficient many times

   1 year ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 0 Vlad !

10. Economist
    67b5
    

    TBF a lot of those calls are effing stupid. Had a conversation with a firm that wanted to do neuro crap during trading. Like spit testing and EEG’s.

    There are at least a few academics fielding these calls from Wall Street people these days

    Name one scholar whose contributions have significantly changed business practice? Hard to think of one, at least in marketing and management

    How about Paul Green?
    https://pages.charlotte.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/868/2014/12/conjoint.pdf

    Frank Bass of Bass model fame. He used to get calls from Wall Street because of his model and its predictions. Recently host of Marketing academics have joined Amazon and other similar cos. Of course, in the area of social psych it may be more difficult to find managerial relevance since they don't care about it much. At JCR at most one para is needed to justify managerial relevance but at JMR and MS whole paper is not sufficient many times
    

    1 year ago # QUOTE 3 Volod 0 Vlad !

11. Economist
    7cf5
    

    How come Kinshuk Jerath publish so many papers (trash) but has not won a single paper award?

    1 year ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 1 Vlad !

12. Economist
    b824
    

    How come Kinshuk Jerath publish so many papers (trash) but has not won a single paper award?

    IMO awards are a noisy signal of quality. There's a lot that influences who gets an award (how well connected the authors are). That said, I don't find his papers to be very interesting.

    1 year ago # QUOTE 4 Volod 0 Vlad !

13. Economist
    67b5
    

    In his defense: they’re definitely marketing. They aren’t that interesting to me but if we purport to care about Marketers and managers, he writes about issues marketers care about. Or at least the titles of his papers cover those issues.

    How come Kinshuk Jerath publish so many papers (trash) but has not won a single paper award?

    IMO awards are a noisy signal of quality. There's a lot that influences who gets an award (how well connected the authors are). That said, I don't find his papers to be very interesting.

    1 year ago # QUOTE 1 Volod 0 Vlad !

14. Economist
    51ae
    

    Awards are mainly about connections and internal politics among seniors. Not a good signal of quality.

    1 year ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 0 Vlad !

15. Economist
    7232
    

    Awards are mainly about connections and internal politics among seniors. Not a good signal of quality.

    well.. that may be true for the dissertation award.. However, award-winning papers from ISMS or other top institutions have never disappointed me.. think about how useful it would be to explain measuring the Superbowl advertising effect with the QME best paper (no sarcasm).

    1 year ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 0 Vlad !

16. Economist
    bd77
    

    Awards are mainly about connections and internal politics among seniors. Not a good signal of quality.

    well.. that may be true for the dissertation award.. However, award-winning papers from ISMS or other top institutions have never disappointed me.. think about how useful it would be to explain measuring the Superbowl advertising effect with the QME best paper (no sarcasm).

    Definitely true for dissertation awards, to some extent for best paper of last year, but not so much for the long term papers. Some popularity is still necessary, but the papers must have an impact to be listed (exceed some citation threshold to begin with)

    1 year ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 0 Vlad !

17. Economist
    bd77
    

    How come Kinshuk Jerath publish so many papers (trash) but has not won a single paper award?

    What did he do to you that you decided to attack him here? These questions do not pop out of blue.

    1 year ago # QUOTE 3 Volod 0 Vlad !

18. Economist
    67b5
    

    That would require people actually reading QME

    Awards are mainly about connections and internal politics among seniors. Not a good signal of quality.

    well.. that may be true for the dissertation award.. However, award-winning papers from ISMS or other top institutions have never disappointed me.. think about how useful it would be to explain measuring the Superbowl advertising effect with the QME best paper (no sarcasm).

    1 year ago # QUOTE 1 Volod 1 Vlad !

19. Economist
    704b
    

    Awards are mainly about connections and internal politics among seniors. Not a good signal of quality.

    You mentioned the exact reason why awards are highly valued. Winning an award = having strong connections to big shots. Schools would love to have faculty who have strong connections.

    1 year ago # QUOTE 1 Volod 0 Vlad !

20. Economist
    fc81
    

    A prerequisite for that would be intelligence.

    That would require people actually reading QME

    Awards are mainly about connections and internal politics among seniors. Not a good signal of quality.

    well.. that may be true for the dissertation award.. However, award-winning papers from ISMS or other top institutions have never disappointed me.. think about how useful it would be to explain measuring the Superbowl advertising effect with the QME best paper (no sarcasm).
    

    1 year ago # QUOTE 1 Volod 1 Vlad !

Reply »