Her rule should be named the "sham rule" because it doesn't work.
Anticipating and preventing recessions saves more lives than a bunch of research into the tinniest details of protein structure.
Open discrimination against male economists by Claudia Sahm
-
stfu. People like Claudia obsess over diversity, hiring, etc. and when someone calls her out on her bs and stupidity, we have to "leave her alone". These people are treated like children yet they want leadership and authority. You can't have both.
My god. Leave her alone. Get a life.
-
stfu. People like Claudia obsess over diversity, hiring, etc. and when someone calls her out on her bs and stupidity, we have to "leave her alone". These people are treated like children yet they want leadership and authority. You can't have both.
My god. Leave her alone. Get a life.
This is the tenth page of the thread. I think you've "called her out." At this point your continued obsession is pathetic.
-
Demand side here with a piece of advice for those sending their JMP to Claudia. I will never admit this to my colleagues, but I fell much less likely to recomend you for an interview if I see that Claudia is tweeting about you. It just signal to me the type of college you will be around if you seek this type of promotion. So be aware of the tradeoffs.
-
I disagree. People like Claudia are a plague.
stfu. People like Claudia obsess over diversity, hiring, etc. and when someone calls her out on her bs and stupidity, we have to "leave her alone". These people are treated like children yet they want leadership and authority. You can't have both.
My god. Leave her alone. Get a life.
This is the tenth page of the thread. I think you've "called her out." At this point your continued obsession is pathetic.
-
stfu. People like Claudia obsess over diversity, hiring, etc. and when someone calls her out on her bs and stupidity, we have to "leave her alone". These people are treated like children yet they want leadership and authority. You can't have both.
My god. Leave her alone. Get a life.
This is the tenth page of the thread. I think you've "called her out." At this point your continued obsession is pathetic.
To be fair she has probably written more then 10 pages on her biased crusade. So asking him (or her) to write less than 10 pages on his (or her) biased crusade is discrimination against this person.
-
https://twitter.com/claudia_sahm/status/1160194387562942466?s=21
Evidence of discrimination against male economists.
First, she is offering to review papers of only female JMCs.
Second, she is doing this without getting punished.
Third, male economists (or males in general) got so insensitive about discrimination against themselves that they don't respond they have been discriminated against when asked by AEA.Doleac did the same sh\t. Disgus ting.