Close

Complete Captcha

• 5 months - 61 posts - Latest - RSS
• Thread: 165 Goods vs 84 No Goods

1. Economist
   44c5
   

   10/10
   This is in fact a very true sentiment shared by many.

   Yeah, and it's called racism.

   Believing England is for the English is racist?

   He is not English. He is Australian.

   5 months ago # QUOTE 6 Volod 3 Vlad !

2. Economist
   b4a5
   

   10/10
   This is in fact a very true sentiment shared by many.

   Yeah, and it's called racism.

   Believing England is for the English is racist?

   He is not English. He is Australian.

   My blood is English. Australia is an arbitrary geographical entity.

   5 months ago # QUOTE 3 Volod 4 Vlad !

3. Economist
   44c5
   

   He is British, you are Australian.

   5 months ago # QUOTE 6 Volod 2 Vlad !

4. Economist
   b4a5
   

   He is British, you are Australian.

   Right because the law exists for billionaire investment bankers to protect the free flow of labour between countries, not the people who are the nation.

   5 months ago # QUOTE 5 Volod 2 Vlad !

5. Economist
   b22b
   

   Pakistani and indians will never be britons

   5 months ago # QUOTE 5 Volod 2 Vlad !

6. Economist
   b22b
   

   Asians and africans in Europe are "guest workers" and they will always be. Everybody knows.

   5 months ago # QUOTE 6 Volod 1 Vlad !

7. Economist
   10e4
   

   this. Those cheanks and njggers can fkc off

   Asians and africans in Europe are "guest workers" and they will always be. Everybody knows.

   5 months ago # QUOTE 1 Volod 2 Vlad !

8. Economist
   5096
   

   I am a 4th generation Australian. My blood is 95 percent pure anglo-saxon.

   Australians trying to establish their worth by tying themselves to Britain is an example of "cultural cringe"
   https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cultural_cringe

   I was just interpreting this as added subtlety in OP's tr0ol post

   5 months ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 0 Vlad !

9. Economist
   5096
   

   look, after the Saxons raeped them, English called themselves Anglo-Saxons

   in 30 years, it will be Anglo-Saxo-Tanis or something like that

   5 months ago # QUOTE 5 Volod 0 Vlad !

10. Economist
    cb72
    

    You could have heard a pin drop.

    5 months ago # QUOTE 2 Volod 0 Vlad !

11. Economist
    b4a5
    

    look, after the Saxons raeped them, English called themselves Anglo-Saxons
    in 30 years, it will be Anglo-Saxo-Tanis or something like that

    You're a Ho-Mo.

    5 months ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 0 Vlad !

12. Economist
    5096
    

    look, after the Saxons raeped them, English called themselves Anglo-Saxons
    in 30 years, it will be Anglo-Saxo-Tanis or something like that

    You're a Ho-Mo.

    Thank you, but the correct term is Hu-Mo (Hungarian Mongolian)

    5 months ago # QUOTE 4 Volod 0 Vlad !

13. Economist
    44c5
    

    He is British, you are Australian.

    Right because the law exists for billionaire investment bankers to protect the free flow of labour between countries, not the people who are the nation.

    Australia is not Britain.

    5 months ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 1 Vlad !

14. Economist
    79a1
    

    If I remember correctly an australian is a foreigner in the UK

    5 months ago # QUOTE 1 Volod 1 Vlad !

15. Economist
    44c5
    

    As far as Britain is concerned, both Australia and Pakistan are former colonies.

    5 months ago # QUOTE 1 Volod 2 Vlad !

16. Economist
    ca5a
    

    I know I’m a bad person for saying this; but threads like this make me happy to think about what is about to happen to Australia in this century with China. At least OP and his children will learn what his little tribes actual place in the world is in the grand scope of history.

    5 months ago # QUOTE 2 Volod 1 Vlad !

17. Economist
    25ca
    

    I know I’m a bad person for saying this; but threads like this make me happy to think about what is about to happen to Australia in this century with China. At least OP and his children will learn what his little tribes actual place in the world is in the grand scope of history.

    what is wrong with disliking Paki&/(/stani immigration officers who dilute a countrys sense of being a nation ?

    5 months ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 0 Vlad !

18. Economist
    df03
    

    I know I’m a bad person for saying this; but threads like this make me happy to think about what is about to happen to Australia in this century with China. At least OP and his children will learn what his little tribes actual place in the world is in the grand scope of history.

    there will be no china by 2040, just a bunch of barbarian warlordships fighting among each other

    5 months ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 0 Vlad !

19. Economist
    44c5
    

    I know I’m a bad person for saying this; but threads like this make me happy to think about what is about to happen to Australia in this century with China. At least OP and his children will learn what his little tribes actual place in the world is in the grand scope of history.

    what is wrong with disliking Paki&/(/stani immigration officers who dilute a countrys sense of being a nation ?

    British immigration officer, not "Pakistani" immigration officer.

    5 months ago # QUOTE 1 Volod 2 Vlad !

20. Economist
    1ff1
    

    As far as Britain is concerned, both Australia and Pakistan are former colonies.

    Yes, but the Pakistanis get treated better.

    5 months ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 0 Vlad !

Reply »