Hebrew: Aumann
Tel Aviv: Rubinstein Gilboa
Harvard: Fudenberg
NYU: APS
Stanford: Milgrom
They have changed the way we do theory!
If you're going to include Gilboa for decision theory, you should also include Gul and Pesendorfer, though it's not clear that any of them should be on such a list.
Fudenberg is at MIT, where I'd put Morris right next to him.
If you're basing on lifetime contribution, then Kreps should be next to Milgrom at Stanford.
Hebrew: Aumann
Tel Aviv: Rubinstein Gilboa
Harvard: Fudenberg
NYU: APS
Stanford: Milgrom
They have changed the way we do theory!
Hebrew: Aumann
Tel Aviv: Rubinstein
Harvard: Maskin
Chicago: Myerson
MIT: Fudenberg Holmstrom
NYU: APS
Stanford: Milgrom Kreps Wilson Roth
BC: Sonmez
Don’t focus on top departments. Tbh, Sonmez is the best matching theorist out there.Hi, Tayfun
I am not him. Name someone whose work is more influential than his if you don’t agree.
Hebrew: Aumann
Tel Aviv: Rubinstein
Harvard: Maskin
Chicago: Myerson
MIT: Fudenberg Holmstrom
NYU: APS
Stanford: Milgrom Kreps Wilson Roth
BC: Sonmez
Don’t focus on top departments. Tbh, Sonmez is the best matching theorist out there.Hi, Tayfun
I am not him. Name someone whose work is more influential than his if you don’t agree.
A random computer scientist
Hebrew: Aumann
Tel Aviv: Rubinstein
Harvard: Maskin
Chicago: Myerson
MIT: Fudenberg Holmstrom
NYU: APS
Stanford: Milgrom Kreps Wilson Roth
BC: Sonmez
Don’t focus on top departments. Tbh, Sonmez is the best matching theorist out there.Hi, Tayfun
I am not him. Name someone whose work is more influential than his if you don’t agree.
A random computer scientist
Micro theorists have created many jobs for computer scientists, not the other way around.