Close

Complete Captcha

• 1 year - 156 posts - Latest - RSS
• Thread: 268 Goods vs 94 No Goods

1. Economist
   e74c
   

   Most of us are Team Black because we don't believe any of VF/AH papers. We just don't say it publicly because we don't want people to investigate our papers.

   You are on Team Black? So which coauthor of Bernie are you?

   I am on Team Black.
   Reg monkeys like Huang's and Fans and Zhangs to h*ll.

   Fang, Vivian W. and Huang, Allen and Karpoff, Jonathan M., Reply to 'The Reg SHO Reanalysis Project: Reconsidering Fang, Huang and Karpoff (2016) on Reg SHO and Earnings Management' by Black et al. (2019) (December 19, 2019). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3507033

   Glad to see this discussion. Look forward to reading this and any replies from BB and co
   

   1 year ago # QUOTE 7 Jab 0 No Jab !

2. Economist
   5e59
   

   ^ I don’t know who AH is but why are you afraid of have your own papers investigated?

   1 year ago # QUOTE 2 Jab 0 No Jab !

3. Economist
   b516
   

   Wait, that wasn’t actually Bernie posting was it? Why would you sign you give credibility to a racist/ sexist message board by signing your name to a post? There are some people who actually care about the things you say. Use your head, man.

   1 year ago # QUOTE 3 Jab 7 No Jab !

4. Economist
   e74c
   

   I think it was, but I am not sure

   Wait, that wasn’t actually Bernie posting was it? Why would you sign you give credibility to a racist/ sexist message board by signing your name to a post? There are some people who actually care about the things you say. Use your head, man.

   1 year ago # QUOTE 0 Jab 0 No Jab !

5. Economist
   3afe
   

   Wait, that wasn’t actually Bernie posting was it? Why would you sign you give credibility to a racist/ sexist message board by signing your name to a post? There are some people who actually care about the things you say. Use your head, man.

   For Chaired Prof level folks, signing to debates about your work on EJMR is a power move. They are so secure in their position, they don't care if anyone thinks twice about it. It allows them to shift debate about their work/ themselves in a way no one else can.

   1 year ago # QUOTE 4 Jab 1 No Jab !

6. Economist
   c218
   

   Very interesting!

   1 year ago # QUOTE 4 Jab 0 No Jab !

7. Economist
   c218
   

   Bernie is a true scholar.

   1 year ago # QUOTE 6 Jab 5 No Jab !

8. Economist
   8230
   

   I believe the accrual measure is important.

   1 year ago # QUOTE 3 Jab 0 No Jab !

9. Economist
   c1fb
   

   What do they find?

   1 year ago # QUOTE 0 Jab 0 No Jab !

10. Economist
    e8e1
    

    Xuan Tian also has a sho paper. What do you think about it?

    1 year ago # QUOTE 1 Jab 0 No Jab !

11. Economist
    c221
    

    Xuan Tian also has a sho paper. What do you think about it?

    XT is a disgrace. His work is intellectual crap. It should be wiped out from history.

    1 year ago # QUOTE 2 Jab 0 No Jab !

12. Economist
    22b3
    

    Are you saying bernard black does not understand accounting?

    I believe the accrual measure is important.

    11 months ago # QUOTE 0 Jab 0 No Jab !

13. Economist
    9548
    

    Are you saying bernard black does not understand accounting?

    I believe the accrual measure is important.
    

    No you are just revealing that you as a mathburator have inferiority complexity towards game theorists.

    11 months ago # QUOTE 0 Jab 0 No Jab !

14. Economist
    7088
    

    Any thoughts on this:

    Reusing Natural Experiments
    Davidson Heath,
    University of Utah
    Matthew C. Ringgenberg,
    University of Utah
    Mehrdad Samadi,
    Southern Methodist University
    Ingrid M. Werner,
    The Ohio State University

    11 months ago # QUOTE 2 Jab 0 No Jab !

15. Economist
    b6e7
    

    Good paper!

    Any thoughts on this:
    Reusing Natural Experiments
    Davidson Heath,
    University of Utah
    Matthew C. Ringgenberg,
    University of Utah
    Mehrdad Samadi,
    Southern Methodist University
    Ingrid M. Werner,
    The Ohio State University

    11 months ago # QUOTE 1 Jab 0 No Jab !

16. Economist
    d3b3
    

    Not sure. Everyone knows the outcome— why write such a paper?

    Good paper!

    Any thoughts on this:
    Reusing Natural Experiments
    Davidson Heath,
    University of Utah
    Matthew C. Ringgenberg,
    University of Utah
    Mehrdad Samadi,
    Southern Methodist University
    Ingrid M. Werner,
    The Ohio State University
    

    11 months ago # QUOTE 0 Jab 0 No Jab !

17. Economist
    9226
    

    Quite funny. DH has several working papers using the same experiment. He should test his own papers first!

    Not sure. Everyone knows the outcome— why write such a paper?

    Good paper!

    Any thoughts on this:
    Reusing Natural Experiments
    Davidson Heath,
    University of Utah
    Matthew C. Ringgenberg,
    University of Utah
    Mehrdad Samadi,
    Southern Methodist University
    Ingrid M. Werner,
    The Ohio State University
    

    11 months ago # QUOTE 0 Jab 0 No Jab !

18. Economist
    8337
    

    Not sure. Here is the bottom line according to a few people who saw the paper: if you want to use a "natural experiment", do your best to be the first to use it. Also, you have to try EVERY single possible outcome variable to make sure that you write a paper about the variable that generates strongest results against corrections for multiple testing. Who gives a cr*p about economic theory? The authors seem to be overselling it. Useful to deter excessive reg-monkey excitement, but good ideas in need of an exogenous shocks should get a chance. In term of contribution, econ people have established all this in much better work long ago.

    Good paper!

    Any thoughts on this:
    Reusing Natural Experiments
    Davidson Heath,
    University of Utah
    Matthew C. Ringgenberg,
    University of Utah
    Mehrdad Samadi,
    Southern Methodist University
    Ingrid M. Werner,
    The Ohio State University
    

    11 months ago # QUOTE 0 Jab 0 No Jab !

19. Economist
    fd40
    

    Any update on Reg SHO?

    4 months ago # QUOTE 0 Jab 0 No Jab !

20. Economist
    6f1a
    

    This is most serious p-hacking problem. MR and their coauthors are doing great jobs in exposing this issue

    4 months ago # QUOTE 1 Jab 0 No Jab !

Reply »