Close

Complete Captcha

• 2 years - 86 posts - Latest - RSS
• Thread: 132 Goods vs 109 No Goods

1. Economist
   c629
   

   2020 bump

   1 year ago # QUOTE 0 Jab 0 No Jab !

2. Economist
   817b
   

   Bump

   1 year ago # QUOTE 0 Jab 0 No Jab !

3. Economist
   50ee
   

   Anything with QJE in number 1 is garbage.

   1 year ago # QUOTE 2 Jab 1 No Jab !

4. Economist
   3bd5
   

   Lol. Hater.

   Anything with QJE in number 1 is garbage.

   1 year ago # QUOTE 1 Jab 2 No Jab !

5. Economist
   0075
   

   According to Repec's 10 year discounted recursive ranking "Research Bulletin, State Bank of Pakistan" has an impact factor that is higher than "Games and Economic Behavior". This means that according to their recursive ranking a citation from the Research Bulletin from Pakistan has a higher weight. I am not a micro person but this is insane.
   Why these guys do not want to exclude non-peer reviewed publications from calculations? Is it going to hurt some favorite journals?

   1 year ago # QUOTE 2 Jab 0 No Jab !

6. Economist
   2739
   

   Repec, last 10 years, recursive, discounted.
   https://ideas.repec.org/top/top.journals.rdiscount10.html
   Please do not post about other rankings; you will look like a biased idiot.

   Finnish economic papers > JFQA, GEB?

   1 year ago # QUOTE 0 Jab 0 No Jab !

7. Economist
   436f
   

   Up

   11 months ago # QUOTE 0 Jab 0 No Jab !

8. Economist
   5369
   

   The AEJs have done well

   11 months ago # QUOTE 0 Jab 0 No Jab !

9. Economist
   fd50
   

   What is the most reliable and up to date ranking?

   11 months ago # QUOTE 0 Jab 0 No Jab !

10. Economist
    09aa
    

    https://ideas.repec.org/top/top.journals.rdiscount10.html

    What is the most reliable and up to date ranking?

    11 months ago # QUOTE 0 Jab 1 No Jab !

11. Economist
    d76c
    

    Still the best

    11 months ago # QUOTE 0 Jab 0 No Jab !

12. Economist
    85d7
    

    It's clear that there is no such thing as top 5. There is only top 1. QJE numba won de best

    11 months ago # QUOTE 0 Jab 0 No Jab !

13. Economist
    0e8c
    

    This:
    The best ranking is AER, QJE, ECTA, JPE are tier 1, Restud is tier 2, all else is tier 3 (add a plus for top fields).

    11 months ago # QUOTE 2 Jab 0 No Jab !

14. Economist
    d7ea
    

    Bump

    10 months ago # QUOTE 0 Jab 0 No Jab !

15. Economist
    2ea1
    

    REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND INSTITUTIONS is life.

    10 months ago # QUOTE 0 Jab 0 No Jab !

16. Economist
    7e70
    

    Bump

    10 months ago # QUOTE 0 Jab 0 No Jab !

17. Economist
    238e
    

    Up

    10 months ago # QUOTE 0 Jab 0 No Jab !

18. Economist
    811d
    

    Indeed

    Still the best

    9 months ago # QUOTE 0 Jab 0 No Jab !

19. Economist
    2ee9
    

    Ba***n is blamed for cross- citations, but does the RFS have two "babies RFS"?, are papers rejected from AER with recommendation to submit to others "babies journals?", Nature officially recommends to shift papers between journals,
    are you sure that he is the one that leads this method?
    Was he the first to manage several journals under one umbrella?
    Maybe you have bad feeling now just that this cycle works against your system?

    9 months ago # QUOTE 0 Jab 0 No Jab !

20. Economist
    25a1
    

    Worst ranking ever

    9 months ago # QUOTE 0 Jab 0 No Jab !

Reply »