Close

Complete Captcha

• 4 months - 403 posts - Latest - RSS
• Thread: 1093 Goods vs 206 No Goods

1. Economist
   0f04
   

   https://academic.oup.com/restud/advance-article/doi/10.1093/restud/rdac085/6982752?login=false

   This is a retraction of: Paola Giuliano, Antonio Spilimbergo, Growing up in a Recession, The Review of Economic Studies, Volume 81, Issue 2, April 2014, Pages 787–817, https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdt040

   The authors and editorial team are retracting this article because the original findings cannot be replicated, likely as a result of an inadvertent coding error. While the original codes and data sets are no longer available, new analysis with a markedly similar data set does not support the original results.

   4 months ago # QUOTE 21 Volod 0 Vlad !

2. Economist
   0f04
   

   Has this ever happened before? seems like a huge scandal!

   4 months ago # QUOTE 1 Volod 0 Vlad !

3. Economist
   fe79
   

   Paola Giuliano is a fraud, not surprised.

   4 months ago # QUOTE 19 Volod 5 Vlad !

4. Economist
   919c
   

   I hope that finance folks have the guts to do the same and retract the junks published in JFE.

   4 months ago # QUOTE 7 Volod 0 Vlad !

5. Economist
   c79b
   

   https://academic.oup.com/restud/advance-article/doi/10.1093/restud/rdac085/6982752?login=false
   This is a retraction of: Paola Giuliano, Antonio Spilimbergo, Growing up in a Recession, The Review of Economic Studies, Volume 81, Issue 2, April 2014, Pages 787–817, https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdt040
   The authors and editorial team are retracting this article because the original findings cannot be replicated, likely as a result of an inadvertent coding error. While the original codes and data sets are no longer available, new analysis with a markedly similar data set does not support the original results.

   I like the reasoning. It might really be simply a coding error rather than deliberate fraud.

   4 months ago # QUOTE 11 Volod 2 Vlad !

6. Economist
   4635
   

   already off her webpage it seems

   4 months ago # QUOTE 1 Volod 0 Vlad !

7. Economist
   1d1d
   

   Not surprised..

   https://academic.oup.com/restud/advance-article/doi/10.1093/restud/rdac085/6982752?login=false
   This is a retraction of: Paola Giuliano, Antonio Spilimbergo, Growing up in a Recession, The Review of Economic Studies, Volume 81, Issue 2, April 2014, Pages 787–817, https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdt040
   The authors and editorial team are retracting this article because the original findings cannot be replicated, likely as a result of an inadvertent coding error. While the original codes and data sets are no longer available, new analysis with a markedly similar data set does not support the original results.

   I like the reasoning. It might really be simply a coding error rather than deliberate fraud.

   4 months ago # QUOTE 1 Volod 0 Vlad !

8. Economist
   a2c3
   

   I've seen more instances of "my dog ate my homework" by profs than by students..

   4 months ago # QUOTE 27 Volod 0 Vlad !

9. Economist
   eb74
   

   who has handled that paper at Restud?

   4 months ago # QUOTE 4 Volod 0 Vlad !

10. Economist
    dd21
    

    Plenty more to come

    4 months ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 0 Vlad !

11. Economist
    4432
    

    “ likely as a result of an inadvertent coding error.”

    LJL, no

    4 months ago # QUOTE 5 Volod 2 Vlad !

12. Economist
    a59b
    

    And the originals do not exist! At what age are we living.

    4 months ago # QUOTE 11 Volod 0 Vlad !

13. Economist
    879c
    

    who has handled that paper at Restud?

    Marco Ottaviani

    4 months ago # QUOTE 2 Volod 0 Vlad !

14. Economist
    436c
    

    I go to her webpage and I see a forthcoming paper at Restud. Is there no punishment?

    who has handled that paper at Restud?

    Marco Ottaviani

    Italian (more precisely Bocconi) mafia.

    4 months ago # QUOTE 11 Volod 2 Vlad !

15. Economist
    7a9e
    

    Where is the replication study?

    4 months ago # QUOTE 5 Volod 0 Vlad !

16. Economist
    a59b
    

    The italian mafia.

    4 months ago # QUOTE 6 Volod 2 Vlad !

17. Economist
    9736
    

    This is a very upright and honest thing to do. Mistakes can happen anytime and it is great if authors admit them and retract their acticle. Kudos!

    4 months ago # QUOTE 20 Volod 4 Vlad !

18. Economist
    0f04
    

    They did not want to retract, they were kind of forced to.

    4 months ago # QUOTE 11 Volod 0 Vlad !

19. Economist
    e752
    

    https://academic.oup.com/restud/advance-article/doi/10.1093/restud/rdac085/6982752?login=false
    This is a retraction of: Paola Giuliano, Antonio Spilimbergo, Growing up in a Recession, The Review of Economic Studies, Volume 81, Issue 2, April 2014, Pages 787–817, https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdt040
    The authors and editorial team are retracting this article because the original findings cannot be replicated, likely as a result of an inadvertent coding error. While the original codes and data sets are no longer available, new analysis with a markedly similar data set does not support the original results.

    I like the reasoning. It might really be simply a coding error rather than deliberate fraud.

    I agree (looking at my own coding, I am sure coding errors happen), but looking at the abstract, those datasets look very standardized. And they find the same result across a range of datasets. Does the retraction mean all the results are overturned or one of them?

    4 months ago # QUOTE 8 Volod 0 Vlad !

20. Economist
    436c
    

    This is a very upright and honest thing to do. Mistakes can happen anytime and it is great if authors admit them and retract their acticle. Kudos!

    Corrected for you:

    This is a very upright and honest thing to do. Losing the data and the codes can happen anytime and it is great if authors admit it. Kudos!

    4 months ago # QUOTE 12 Volod 2 Vlad !

Reply »