Close

Complete Captcha

• 2 years - 85 posts - Latest - RSS
• Thread: 386 Goods vs 309 No Goods

1. Economist
   a892
   

   She is the best and you are all losers.

   Can you please explain to the rest of us what the contribution of her paper is, and how it advances our understanding of economics

   2 years ago # QUOTE 3 Good 2 No Good !

2. Economist
   5abf
   

   The profession is hopelessly skewed in favour of women. What is news here?

   2 years ago # QUOTE 2 Good 3 No Good !

3. Economist
   9141
   

   Not a fan of the research, but her Twitter feed is pretty cool #saskatchewin

   Love that she put her personal email address and her Twitter feed

   2 years ago # QUOTE 0 Good 4 No Good !

4. Economist
   182e
   

   This thread must be full of jealous grad students who don't have flyouts. Sarsons is humble but makes a lot of self-deprecating jokes. Get over it. Her research is good and that is why she gets good offers.

   2 years ago # QUOTE 5 Good 7 No Good !

5. Economist
   182e
   

   seriously, I just looked at her twitter feed and it is one joke about herself and then retweets about Canada, Goldin, and books. get over yourselves.

   2 years ago # QUOTE 0 Good 4 No Good !

Reply

Post <blockquote><blockquote><blockquote>And normally I’d feel bad about criticizing a current JMC like this but her wholehearted embrace of exaggerated press coverage really gets to me. </blockquote> ther eis a lot of crp thrown at her but I can agree w/ this one. write your papers, get them published, THEN get press to write about them. I am SO SICK of HRMs having the NYT write about their early drafts... </blockquote> Omg, that's outrageous! What's next? People actually reading her papers?</blockquote>

Send Post »

Markup: a blockquote code em strong ul ol li.