What would be a fair (in EJMR spirit) outcome of this conflict?
Schiraldi (LSE) and Seiler (Stanford) false coauthors of AER publication
-
these guys are smart enough to get academic posts at HRM and yet dumb enough to think that they can get away with such behavior. Hope its gonna be a good lesson for a new generation of researchers on coauthoring.
Have a few friends at LSE. They are disgusted by PS behavior.
-
basically an apology and not listing the paper anymore on their CV would be fine.
No need to humiliate PS and SS more but they need to officially acknowledge they are not co authors.
What would be a fair (in EJMR spirit) outcome of this conflict?
At minimum, a corrigendum indicating that Schiraldi and Seiler are not coauthors of the TSSS paper (now TS or ST).
-
basically an apology and not listing the paper anymore on their CV would be fine.
No need to humiliate PS and SS more but they need to officially acknowledge they are not co authors.What would be a fair (in EJMR spirit) outcome of this conflict?
At minimum, a corrigendum indicating that Schiraldi and Seiler are not coauthors of the TSSS paper (now TS or ST).
I agree they need to officially acknowledge they are not co authors. I think the best way to do that is through a corrigendum.
-
basically an apology and not listing the paper anymore on their CV would be fine.
No need to humiliate PS and SS more but they need to officially acknowledge they are not co authors.What would be a fair (in EJMR spirit) outcome of this conflict?
At minimum, a corrigendum indicating that Schiraldi and Seiler are not coauthors of the TSSS paper (now TS or ST).
I agree they need to officially acknowledge they are not co authors. I think the best way to do that is through a corrigendum.
Who will be the author of the corrigendum and in what order ?
-
At minimum, a corrigendum indicating that Schiraldi and Seiler are not coauthors of the TSSS paper (now TS or ST).
I agree they need to officially acknowledge they are not co authors. I think the best way to do that is through a corrigendum.
Who will be the author of the corrigendum and in what order ?
That's for HS and OT to figure out. My guess is OT.
-
Short story:
1.
Pasquale Schiraldi (LSE) and Stephan Seiler (Stanford) threatened OT to add their names to his paper with HS. Otherwise they would impede publication. In writing, too:
https://sites.google.com/site/oyvindthomassen/file-cabinet/Schiraldi_threat.pdf?attredirects=0&d=12.
HS backs OT’s story
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Oad2I-a1SuKesWp0iu84zVuX1CKhuEo2/view
(click three dots > details to see that this is HS is file's owner)3.
SS put in work on a different paper with HS that didn’t work out, so feels he deserved to be in on the HS/OT paper, as he explains here: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1AhzyKNJzS0vTOTpYZIN8iZPvkUjUKDwQ4.
OT refutes SS' main claim to authorship (that PS/SS came up with 2-stop shopping model) by providing evidence that HS worked on 2-stop shopping before SS and PS got involved)
https://sites.google.com/site/oyvindthomassen/file-cabinet/TSSS_statement_ot_23Dec2018.pdf?attredirects=0&d=15. PS has made no statement.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Links to pages of the thread where new information is revealed
OT initial post with facts
https://www.econjobrumors.com/topic/schiraldi-lse-and-seiler-stanford-false-coauthors-of-aer-publicationHS statement comes at
https://www.econjobrumors.com/topic/schiraldi-lse-and-seiler-stanford-false-coauthors-of-aer-publication/page/31SS statement at
https://www.econjobrumors.com/topic/schiraldi-lse-and-seiler-stanford-false-coauthors-of-aer-publication/page/38OT second statement at
https://www.econjobrumors.com/topic/schiraldi-lse-and-seiler-stanford-false-coauthors-of-aer-publication/page/45
Other than that, this thread consists (early on) of people’s opinions on the information mentioned above and (later) mainly irrelevant nonsense from someone who wants to bury the facts. -
EU labor laws
Pasquale's last email is a shame. with literally zero contribution he forced a junior to include his name on an aer paper. this guy's other papers are also mediocre or weak at best, how come lse still keeps him in that position?
Those laws won't apply for much longer. Bye bye bully