Typo Schiforldi, or Schifoldy dick sucker
I mean YOUR grey teeth.
Why or grey teeth? Did PS take your dentures away?
Well said, you LSE lackey. How much dieick you sucked to get an adjunct position at LSE with our grey teeth?
Correct. LSE is clearly the center of the world dominating conspiracy against suppressed science genius OT. The UK police needs to look into this!
It does make you think that LSE has a deep-rooted problem.
They have actually opened an investigation but from what i heard there won’t be consequences. They ask neutral referees which are in ps‘s network and those will confirm that ps was right in claiming coauthorship
Let’s not forget what happened is:
- OT shows document evidence that PS/SS didn’t just”claim coauthorship” but blackmailed their names onto a paper;
- HS (who is a PS/SS coauthor!) confirms that their was never a legitimate claim of coauthorship ... so PS’ bullying tactics were not a case of “the ends justify the means” or anything remotely like that;
- PS makes no attempt to defend against these allegations (while SS makes a laughable half-baked attempt) ... basically these two jokers admitted to what happened.
And now a “neutral” referee says PS was “right in claiming coauthorship” and case closed for LSE? If true, that’s disgusting.
It's not true. Because nobody at LSE or anywhere cares, lol.
They have actually opened an investigation but from what i heard there won’t be consequences. They ask neutral referees which are in ps‘s network and those will confirm that ps was right in claiming coauthorshipLet’s not forget what happened is:
- OT shows document evidence that PS/SS didn’t just”claim coauthorship” but blackmailed their names onto a paper;
- HS (who is a PS/SS coauthor!) confirms that their was never a legitimate claim of coauthorship ... so PS’ bullying tactics were not a case of “the ends justify the means” or anything remotely like that;
- PS makes no attempt to defend against these allegations (while SS makes a laughable half-baked attempt) ... basically these two jokers admitted to what happened.
And now a “neutral” referee says PS was “right in claiming coauthorship” and case closed for LSE? If true, that’s disgusting.
This topic has been closed to new replies.