Let me be clear about what is going to happen.
Best
Pasquale
Schiraldi (LSE) and Seiler (Stanford) false coauthors of AER publication
-
Rising star adjunct. Oh my sides. You're funny when you do drugs minchione.
You've been out for more than a decade. It turns out that you got two top 5s. One, like Nava makes sure to tell everyone, he had to freakin do everything as you can't seem to put two and two together. The other you stole it outright by bullying someone ina fragile position. Rising star scumbag is more like it.
-
Minchione Schifoldi is a rising star retard in the skies of retardation, that one we all knew.
But this story with Nava is novel, thanks for sharing.
Rising star adjunct. Oh my sides. You're funny when you do drugs minchione.
You've been out for more than a decade. It turns out that you got two top 5s. One, like Nava makes sure to tell everyone, he had to freakin do everything as you can't seem to put two and two together. The other you stole it outright by bullying someone ina fragile position. Rising star scumbag is more like it. -
Please stop these offensive and unproved remarks.
What you are doing is despicable and what you are achieving is ignoble.
You seem fixated in your thoughts and show distasteful judgment.
Nobody in this forum thinks what you are writing here is good, nor approves your manners.
Please cut this displicable behavior.
-
"Please cut this displicable behavior"
English M0fo, do you speak it?
Please stop these offensive and unproved remarks.
What you are doing is despicable and what you are achieving is ignoble.
You seem fixated in your thoughts and show distasteful judgment.
Nobody in this forum thinks what you are writing here is good, nor approves your manners.
Please cut this displicable behavior. -
Short story:
1.
Pasquale Schiraldi (LSE) and Stephan Seiler (Stanford) threatened OT to add their names to his paper with HS. Otherwise they would impede publication. In writing, too:
https://sites.google.com/site/oyvindthomassen/file-cabinet/Schiraldi_threat.pdf?attredirects=0&d=1
2.
HS backs OT’s story
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Oad2I-a1SuKesWp0iu84zVuX1CKhuEo2/view
3.
SS put in work on a different paper with HS that didn’t work out, so feels he deserved to be in on the HS/OT paper, as he explains here: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1AhzyKNJzS0vTOTpYZIN8iZPvkUjUKDwQ
4.
OT refutes SS' only claim to authorship (that PS/SS came up with 2-stop shopping idea, but HS worked on 2-stop shopping before SS and PS got involved)
https://sites.google.com/site/oyvindthomassen/file-cabinet/TSSS_statement_ot_23Dec2018.pdf?attredirects=0&d=1
5. PS has made no statement.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Links to pages of the thread where new information is revealed
OT initial post with facts
https://www.econjobrumors.com/topic/schiraldi-lse-and-seiler-stanford-false-coauthors-of-aer-publication
HS statement comes at
https://www.econjobrumors.com/topic/schiraldi-lse-and-seiler-stanford-false-coauthors-of-aer-publication/page/31
SS statement at
https://www.econjobrumors.com/topic/schiraldi-lse-and-seiler-stanford-false-coauthors-of-aer-publication/page/38
OT second statement at
https://www.econjobrumors.com/topic/schiraldi-lse-and-seiler-stanford-false-coauthors-of-aer-publication/page/45
Other than that, this thread consists (early on) of people’s opinions on the information mentioned above and (later) a lot of irrelevant nonsense from someone who wants to bury the facts. -
Oyvind,
we haven't meet in person before I believe, I am a co-author of Howard Smith on a paper that is quite related to the one
you have with him. For the purpose of full disclosure to all parties, I wanted to loop you in on the conversation below. I
believe that Howard has talked to you about the overlap between the paper he has with you and the one he has with
Pasquale Schiraldi and I. I understand that he asked you about putting both papers under joint co-authorship which you
did not want to do. Pasquale and I strongly believe that joint authorship would be the only viable solution given that the
papers share the core model which was developed for our paper and subsequently used in your work with Howard. I
realize that this conversation is a bit unpleasant, but felt it might be better to have all affected parties in the loop on this.
Below you can see the recent exchanged between Howard, Pasquale and I. I hope you understand the concerns we
have and I hope that we will be able to find a solution that works for everybody.
--
Stephan Seiler
Associate Professor of Marketing
Stanford GSB
https://people.stanford.edu/sseiler/
Topic Closed
This topic has been closed to new replies.