Soiler doesn't pretend to be the good cop; that would be too sophisticated for that bully's brain. Rather he plays what he is: Schifo's gimp.
Everybody who reads the posts carefully understands that Pasquale Schiraldi blackmailed OT while Stephan Seiler pretended to be the good cop.FTFY.
Clearly seems to be your strategy, neckbeard. As if anything will ever happen!
We will continue with this posting as a broken record, and we don't care if people perceive us as awkward, or paranoid. We will never stop. We have energy and time and our leader will guide us to reach success.
The real scandal is that OT participated in this fraud and included the two false co-authors. Given this, the entire paper should be retracted and OT and and HS should be sanctioned for including additional authors for personal gain.
I disagree. Only OT should be sanctioned because he stole the idea.
We will continue, we will not give up.
I spent the entire Christmas day to think about a new bad word to throw to the subjects of this forum that I am fixated against. My mind is fixated on this and I prove pleasure in letting other people know about my scorn.
Fortunately, Other people join forces, and we will continue with this virtual harassment, no stop, as a broken record. Nobody will stop us!
We will continue, we will not give up.
I spent the entire Christmas day to think about a new bad word to throw to the subjects of this forum that I am fixated against. My mind is fixated on this and I prove pleasure in letting other people know about my scorn.
Fortunately, Other people join forces, and we will continue with this virtual harassment, no stop, as a broken record. Nobody will stop us!
Just remove your name from the paper, Stephan.
Short story:
1.
Pasquale Schiraldi (LSE) and Stephan Seiler (Stanford) threatened OT to add their names to his paper with HS. Otherwise they would impede publication. In writing, too:
https://sites.google.com/site/oyvindthomassen/file-cabinet/Schiraldi_threat.pdf?attredirects=0&d=1
2.
HS backs OT’s story
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Oad2I-a1SuKesWp0iu84zVuX1CKhuEo2/view
3.
SS put in work on a different paper with HS that didn’t work out, so feels he deserved to be in on the HS/OT paper, as he explains here: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1AhzyKNJzS0vTOTpYZIN8iZPvkUjUKDwQ
4.
OT refutes SS' only claim to authorship (that PS/SS came up with 2-stop shopping idea, but HS worked on 2-stop shopping before SS and PS got involved)
https://sites.google.com/site/oyvindthomassen/file-cabinet/TSSS_statement_ot_23Dec2018.pdf?attredirects=0&d=1
5. PS has made no statement.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Links to pages of the thread where new information is revealed
OT initial post with facts
https://www.econjobrumors.com/topic/schiraldi-lse-and-seiler-stanford-false-coauthors-of-aer-publication
HS statement comes at
https://www.econjobrumors.com/topic/schiraldi-lse-and-seiler-stanford-false-coauthors-of-aer-publication/page/31
SS statement at
https://www.econjobrumors.com/topic/schiraldi-lse-and-seiler-stanford-false-coauthors-of-aer-publication/page/38
OT second statement at
https://www.econjobrumors.com/topic/schiraldi-lse-and-seiler-stanford-false-coauthors-of-aer-publication/page/45
Other than that, this thread consists of people’s opinions on the information mentioned above and a lot of irrelevant nonsense from someone who wants to bury the facts.
Pretty poor English, Soiler
We have been constantly and consistently harassing people in this forum for more than one year by now, and we will not stop now.
Nobody stopped us nor they will never do! .
Let's join forces and continue with out swear words and harassment, nobody will stop us!
This topic has been closed to new replies.