GD isn’t autistic, he’s a compulsive liar (with ample evidence) and a serial sexual predator (again, evidence, you guys just don’t see the details).
Many victims don’t want to go on the record when they are in the same profession, and I don’t blame them. But that means that he gets away with it. He burns one bridge, maybe changes fields slightly, and keeps on trucking. But whatever, send your daughters to be molested in his “crime lab”. Lol
This site needs to be closed down.
Ask anyone who knows him from grad school. Or ask people who have worked with him.Two ways to interpret this:
1) Many of these people have proof that GD is a criminal (e.g., they witnessed something). But none of them are willing to testify against GD, they're all happy to see him walk free.
2) These people heard of the same story.
3) GD behaved in a weird or creepy way, and that is enough evidence to ruin people's lives.
If it's (1), it makes the whole story less plausible, not more. If it's (2), it does not add any evidence: they're correlated observations.
If it's (3), think about the implications of your argument for, say, autistic people.