Close

Complete Captcha

• 1 week - 86 posts - Latest - RSS
• Thread: 263 Goods vs 194 No Goods

1. Economist
   a288
   

   It really shows you for what you are. There are few people at his level in the profession who spend as much time as he does helping students and early-stage people. He really does not chase prestige the way most at his level do.

   And this business about Azians and "bad personality." That's what the regressions said. He was hired to do them and explain them. His job was not to justify using "personality scores" for admissions. If you don't like them (and I think the entire idea of a personality score is made-up b.s. to allow places like Harvard to reject anyone they want) then focus on them.

   1 week ago # QUOTE 6 Jab 42 No Jab !

2. Economist
   7b65
   

   hi david. are you still a racist?

   1 week ago # QUOTE 32 Jab 2 No Jab !

3. Economist
   6962
   

   Hi David!

   1 week ago # QUOTE 2 Jab 1 No Jab !

4. Economist
   9100
   

   Yes, and people should stop hating his predilection for beastiality. If he wants to attempt to copulate with beasts of burden such as donkeys, dolphins, and the common golden retriever that's his right. What he does on his private time is his business.

   1 week ago # QUOTE 12 Jab 4 No Jab !

5. Economist
   0aa2
   

   He said on the witness stand that:

   1. His analysis showed that Asians are relatively less-rounded.
   2. He had never heard before that being less well-rounded was a negative Asian stereotype.

   1 week ago # QUOTE 19 Jab 3 No Jab !

6. Economist
   0d7b
   

   Thank you for defending my good name against the personal attacks by those bad personalities manlets!
   -David

   1 week ago # QUOTE 1 Jab 3 No Jab !

7. Economist
   3fb2
   

   There’s truth to this. As PA said he doesn’t blame Card for his work for Harvard since he was hired to represent their interests. But there’s no excuse for people who signed amicus briefs supporting Harvard.

   1 week ago # QUOTE 10 Jab 0 No Jab !

8. Economist
   9a6e
   

   David is causing real harm to society and to Harvard, he is being opportunist and short termist and on the wrong side of history

   1 week ago # QUOTE 7 Jab 2 No Jab !

9. Economist
   fbcd
   

   I'll hate whoever I want because this is a free country

   1 week ago # QUOTE 0 Jab 2 No Jab !

10. Economist
    fbcd
    

    It really shows you for what you are. There are few people at his level in the profession who spend as much time as he does helping students and early-stage people. He really does not chase prestige the way most at his level do.
    And this business about Azians and "bad personality." That's what the regressions said. He was hired to do them and explain them. His job was not to justify using "personality scores" for admissions. If you don't like them (and I think the entire idea of a personality score is made-up b.s. to allow places like Harvard to reject anyone they want) then focus on them.

    also please go back to worshipping st. floyd

    1 week ago # QUOTE 2 Jab 3 No Jab !

11. Economist
    8398
    

    Man, the reactions to this are as bad as they are predictable.

    There is a lot of prejudice against Asians in this country (and the world) and academia is perhaps worse than the rest of society. Card did not cause it.

    1 week ago # QUOTE 3 Jab 7 No Jab !

12. Economist
    fbcd
    

    Man, the reactions to this are as bad as they are predictable.
    There is a lot of prejudice against Asians in this country (and the world) and academia is perhaps worse than the rest of society. Card did not cause it.

    So? He's enabling it. So he deserves every bit of scorn that's cast his way. Is it arbitrary? Yeah. Are there others who discriminate against Asians? Sure. But who cares- he's an obvious, visible target. Tough luck, David. Maybe in another life.

    1 week ago # QUOTE 13 Jab 2 No Jab !

13. Economist
    8398
    

    It really shows you for what you are. There are few people at his level in the profession who spend as much time as he does helping students and early-stage people. He really does not chase prestige the way most at his level do.
    And this business about Azians and "bad personality." That's what the regressions said. He was hired to do them and explain them. His job was not to justify using "personality scores" for admissions. If you don't like them (and I think the entire idea of a personality score is made-up b.s. to allow places like Harvard to reject anyone they want) then focus on them.

    also please go back to worshipping st. floyd

    Wow. Just wow.

    So we are all supposed to (1) feel bad for Asian kids who cannot get into Harvard but (2) applaud the police murder of a Black man? Bigotry takes a lot of forms. If yours is "mein Volk ueber Alles" then you will not get a lot of support from others

    1 week ago # QUOTE 3 Jab 16 No Jab !

14. Economist
    9100
    

    In addition to being racist, don't forget that Card is part of the AEA cabal that supports and encourages academic corruption.

    1 week ago # QUOTE 4 Jab 3 No Jab !

15. Economist
    405c
    

    So what you're saying is, it's fine to peddle racist stereotypes as an "expert" as long as someone else is paying you to do it?

    1 week ago # QUOTE 6 Jab 1 No Jab !

16. Economist
    4182
    

    History will be unkind to the racism of David Card (in 50 years that's the onl thing he will be known for).

    1 week ago # QUOTE 6 Jab 2 No Jab !

17. Economist
    6962
    

    He took the money, he deserves the scorn. He could have resigned, or at least have taken a more balanced approach than to deny the obvious fact that the most plausible interpretation of his analysis was blatant discrimination.

    1 week ago # QUOTE 10 Jab 1 No Jab !

18. Economist
    ccb1
    

    There’s truth to this. As PA said he doesn’t blame Card for his work for Harvard since he was hired to represent their interests. But there’s no excuse for people who signed amicus briefs supporting Harvard.

    If you were hired to assassinate somebody, does that make you innocent?

    1 week ago # QUOTE 4 Jab 2 No Jab !

19. Economist
    ccb1
    

    History will be unkind to the racism of David Card (in 50 years that's the onl thing he will be known for).

    This. He will mainly be remembered for his enablement of the discrimination against Asian Americans.

    1 week ago # QUOTE 6 Jab 1 No Jab !

20. Economist
    8398
    

    History will be unkind to the racism of David Card (in 50 years that's the onl thing he will be known for).

    This. He will mainly be remembered for his enablement of the discrimination against Asian Americans.

    By you, because you are nutz.

    1 week ago # QUOTE 0 Jab 6 No Jab !

Reply »